Article published In: Sound, Form, and Meaning of Chinese Dialects
Edited by Ik-sang Eom
[Language and Linguistics 20:1] 2019
► pp. 46–84
Interactions between prosody and morphosyntax in Fuzhou VO phrases
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 2 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00029.che
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00029.che
Abstract
This study examines how tone sandhi domains (TSDs) are determined in Fuzhou. The data include: (i) regular verb-object phrases
(VOs) where the verb takes a direct bare noun object; and (ii) non-canonical VOs where the verb takes an adverbial expression as a
surface object.
Several observations are made. First, a three-way sandhi exists within every TSD. All antepenultimate syllables neutralize to low
tones. A penultimate syllable’s sandhi tone is dependent on the final syllable’s citation tone, which remains unchanged. Second,
in regular VOs, a monosyllabic verb consistently forms a single TSD with its direct bare noun object, but a disyllabic verb and
its object are separated into two TSDs. Third, in non-canonical VOs, a monosyllabic verb never forms a single TSD with its
adverbial object. Three questions are raised. First, what is the nature of each TSD? Second, why does the number of syllables in a
verb determine the distinct TSDs formed in regular VOs? Third, how can we account for the different patterns of TSD formation in
two types of VOs?
We propose that each TSD equals to a prosodic word (PrWd). OT analyses are provided to show how PrWds are derived. The analysis of
regular VOs relies on the ranking of a prosodic markedness constraint ft bin above the word-level interface
correspondence constraints. The contrast between two types of VOs is explained by applying the model of Multiple Spell-Out and a
cyclic interaction of morphosyntax and prosody. This approach is new in explaining the TSDs that are constrained by
morphosyntax.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Language background
- 2.1Data sources and transcription conventions
- 2.2Fuzhou tonal system and diagnostics for TSDs
- 3.The formation of TSDs in Fuzhou VOs
- 3.1Verbs with direct bare noun objects
- 3.1.1Monosyllabic verbs with direct bare noun objects
- 3.1.2Disyllabic verbs with direct bare noun objects
- 3.2Verbs with non-canonical/adverbial objects
- 3.3Summary
- 3.1Verbs with direct bare noun objects
- 4.The prosodic nature of TSDs
- 4.1Fuzhou prosodic categories established in previous literatures
- 4.2Prosodic word as the domain for tone sandhi
- 4.2.1The structure of the prosodic word
- 4.2.2Prosodic constraints on the structures of the prosodic words
- 5.Interaction of constraints on the formation of prosodic words
- 5.1The formation of prosodic words in regular VOs
- 5.2The formation of prosodic words in non-canonical VOs
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (49)
Chan, Marjorie K. M. 1985. Fuzhou phonology: A non-linear analysis of tone and stress. Seattle: University of Washington. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Chen, Zeping. 2010. Shijiu shiji yilai de Fuzhou fangyan [
Fuzhou dialects since 19th century
]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Hale, Kenneth & Kenstowicz, Michael (eds.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Dai, Xiang-ling. 1992. Chinese morphology and its interface with the syntax. Columbus: The Ohio State University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Duanmu, San, 2004. Left-headed feet and phrasal stress in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 33(1). 65–103.
. 2005. The tone-syntax interface in Chinese: Some recent controversies. In Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium Cross-linguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena, Historical Development, Tone-syntax Interface, and Descriptive Studies, 221–254. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Elfner, Emily. 2012. Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Epstein, S. David & Seely, T. Daniel. 2002. Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Epstein, S. David & Seely, T. Daniel (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1990. Intrinsic F0 in tense and lax vowels with special reference to German. Phonetica 471. 99–140.
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In Kiparsky, Paul & Youmans, Gilbert (eds.), Rhythm and meter, 201–260. San Diego: Academic Press.
Itô, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2003. Weak layering and word binarity. In Honma, Takeru & Okazaki, Masao & Tabata, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Shin-Ichi (eds.), A new century of phonology and phonological theory: A Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 26–65. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Jiang-King, Ping. 1995. An optimality account of tone-vowel interaction in Fuzhou. In Suzuki, Keiichiro & Elzinga, Dirk (eds.), Proceedings of the 1995 Southwestern Workshop on Optimality Theory (SWOT), 89–118. Tucson: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona.
. 1996. An optimality account of tone-vowel interaction in Northern Min. Vancouver: University of British Columbia. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1999. Tone-vowel interaction in optimality theory (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 16). Munich: LINCOM Europa.
Kaisse, Ellen M. 1985. Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.
Kratzer, Angelika & Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spell-out: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 241. 93–135.
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress s and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 81. 249–336.
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2014. Light verbs. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 73–99. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Li, Rulong & Liang, Yuzhang & Zou, Guangchun & Chen, Zeping. 1994. Fuzhou fangyan cidian [Fuzhou dialect dictionary]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.
Li, Rong & Feng, Aizhen. 1998. Fuzhou fangyan cidian [Fuzhou dialect dictionary]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Publishing House.
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 2008. Generalized alignment: Prosody. In McCarthy, John J. (ed.), Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, 167–177. [URL]) (Accessed 2018-06-11)
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1982. Prosodic domains of external sandhi rules. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, vol. 11, 225–255. Dordrecht: Foris.
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. New Brunswick: The Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University. (Technical Report.)
. 1981. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Fretheim, Thorstein (ed.), Nordic prosody II:Papers from a symposium, 111–140. Trondheim: Tapir.
. 2000. The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In Horne, Merle (ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiments, 231–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2008. The prosodic structure of function words. In McCarthy, John J. (ed.), Optimality theory in phonology: A reader, 464–482. ([URL]) (Accessed 2018-06-11)
. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In Goldsmith, John & Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell.
Selkirk, Elisabeth & Shen, Tong. 1990. Prosodic domains in Shanghai Chinese. In Inkelas, Sharon & Zec, Draga (eds.), The phonology-syntax connection, 313–337. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shi, Xinyuan. 2012. Tone sandhi of prosodic word in Suzhou Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong. (M. Phil. thesis.)
Shen, Xiaonan Susan. 1993. Relative duration as a perceptual cue to stress in Mandarin. Language and Speech 361. 415–433.
Simpson, Andrew & Wu, Zoe. 2002. Understanding cyclic spell-out. In Hirotani, Masako (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 32
, 499–518. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA.)
Šurkalović, Dragana. 2015. The No-Reference Hypothesis: A modular approach to the syntax-phonology interface. Tromsø: University of Tromsø (Doctoral dissertation.)
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Epstein, S. David & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.), Working minimalism. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
