Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:4 (2018) ► pp.635–662
Deriving sluicing-like constructions in Isbukun Bunun
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 10 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00023.wu
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00023.wu
Abstract
This paper investigates the sluicing-like constructions (SLCs) in Isbukun Bunun, a language which always places its wh-words at the left-peripheral position, and it is argued that genuine sluicing is not available in this language. The evidence in favor of the pseudo-sluicing analysis draws on the behavior of how-phrases, the failure of implicit discourse anaphoric arguments and the absence of sloppy identity reading in Isbukun SLCs. These properties are otherwise hard to accommodate in a movement and deletion approach but rather follow from the view that SLCs in Isbukun Bunun are derived from independent syntactic operations including pro-drop.
Keywords: sluicing, pseudo-sluicing,
wh-formation,
pro-drop, Isbukun Bunun
Article outline
- 1.Setting the stage
- 2.Isbukun Bunun: Word order and question formation
- 3.Deriving SLCs in Isbukun Bunun: A case of pseudo-sluicing
- 3.1Data and analysis
- 3.2Arguments for the pseudo-sluicing analysis
- 3.2.1Behavior of how-phrase
- 3.2.2Implicit anaphoric arguments
- 3.2.3Absence of sloppy reading
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (81)
Adams, Perng Wang & Tomioka, Satoshi. 2012. Sluicing in Mandarin Chinese: An instance of pseudo-sluicing. In Merchant, Jason & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), Sluicing: Cross-linguistic perspectives, 219–247. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adger, David & Ramchand, Gillian. 2005. Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2). 161–193.
Aldridge, Edith. 2002. Nominalization and wh-movement in Seediq and Tagalog. Language and Linguistics 3(2). 393–426.
. 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2006. The heterogeneity of VOS and extraction in Austronesian languages. Evanston: Northwestern University. (Manuscript.)
Chang, Henry Y. 1997. Voice, case and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Chang, Chung-yang Marco. 2010. On the interrogative constructions in Isbukun Bunun. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University. (Master’s thesis.)
Chao, Wynn. 1987. On ellipsis. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Chung, Sandra. 1998. The design of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Cover, Rebecca T. & Kim, Yuni (eds.), BLS 31: General session and parasession on prosodic variation and change, 73–91. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. & McCloskey, James. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3(3). 239–282.
Fukaya, Teruhiko & Hoji, Hajime. 1999. Stripping and sluicing in Japanese and some implications. In Bird, Sonya & Carnie, Andrew & Haugen, Jason D. & Norquest, Peter (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 145–158. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Gärtner, Hans-Martin & Law, Paul & Sabel, Joachim (eds.). 2006. Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Georgopoulos, Carol. 1991. Syntactic variables: Resumptive pronouns and A’ binding in Palauan. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gribanova, Vera & Manetta, Emily. 2016. Ellipsis in wh-in-situ languages: Deriving apparent sluicing in Hindi-Urdu and Uzbek. Linguistic Inquiry 47(4). 631–668.
Guilfoyle, Eithne & Hung, Henrietta & Travis, Lisa. 1992. Spec of IP and spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10(3). 375–414.
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than’s in English. In Corum, Claudia & Smith-Stark, T. Cedric & Weiser, Ann (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 179–191. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
. 2011. Turkish pseudo-sluicing. (Paper presented at the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Tucson, 22–24 April 2011.)
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Hermon, Gabriella. 2009. Language typology and Universal Grammar: A commentary on the paper by Eric Potsdam. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(4). 773–787.
Hoyt, Frederick & Teodorescu, Alexandra. 2012. How many kinds of sluicing, and why?: Single and multiple sluicing in Romanian, English and Japanese. In Merchant, Jason & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), Sluicing: Cross-linguistic perspectives, 83–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.
Huang, Hui-chuan J. 2008. Competition between syllabic and metrical constraints in two Bunun dialects. Linguistics 46(1). 1–32.
Huang, Hui-chuan J. & Shih, Chao-Kai. 2016. Bunongyu yufa gailun [An overview of Bunun grammar]. Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
Huang, Lillian M. & Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Yeh, Marie M. & Chang, Anna H. & Wu, Joy J. 1999. A typological overview of pronominal systems of some Formosan languages. In Wang, H. Samuel & Tsao, Feng-fu & Lien, Chinfa (eds.), Selected papers from the 5th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 165–198. Taipei: Crane Publishing.
Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Groenendijk, Jeroen A. G. & Janssen, Theo M. V. & Stokhof, Martin B. J. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language: Mathematical centre tracts 135, 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In McCawley, James (ed.), Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground, 363–385. New York: Academic Press.
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 63–99.
Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(4). 867–916.
Kroeger, Paul. 1992. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Li, Lilian Li-ying. 2010.
Clitics in Nantou Isbukun Bunun (Austronesian)
. Nantou: National Chi Nan University. (Master’s thesis.)
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1988. A comparative study of Bunun dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 59(2). 479–508.
. 1997. A syntactic typology of Formosan Languages – case markers on nouns and pronouns. In Tseng, Chiu-yu (ed.), Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China, 343–378. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.
Massam, Diane. 2003. Questions and the left periphery in Niuean. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Austronesia Formal Linguistics Association, 94–106. Ithaca: Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics.
Merchant, Jason. 1998. Pseudosluicing: Elliptical clefts in Japanese and English. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Fuhrhop, Nanna & Law, Paul & Kleinhenz, Ursula (eds.), ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 101, 88–112. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Johnson, Kyle (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moltmann, Friederike. 2006. Unbound anaphoric pronouns: E-Type, dynamic and structured- propositions approaches. Synthese 153(2). 199–260.
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 671–714.
Otsuka, Yuko. 2005. Syntax and/or pragmatics: PP-scrambling in Tongan and the thematic hierarchy. In Heinz, Jeffrey & Ntelitheos, Dimitrios (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of AFLA, 343–357. Los Angeles: UCLA.
Partee, Barbara H. 2008. RGGU: Formal semantics and anaphora. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. (Lecture notes.)
Paul, Ileana M. 2000. Malagasy clause structure. Montreal: McGill University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Pearson, Matthew. 2001. The clause structure of Malagasy: A minimalist approach. Los Angeles: UCLA. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2005. The Malagasy subject/topic as an A’-element. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(2). 381–457.
Polinsky, Maria & Potsdam, Eric. To appear. Austronesian syntax. In Palmer, Bill (ed.), Oceania. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Potsdam, Eric. 2006. More concealed pseudoclefts in Malagasy and the clausal typing hypothesis. Lingua 116(12). 2154–2182.
. 2007. Malagasy sluicing and its consequences for the identity requirement on ellipsis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(3). 577–613.
. 2009. Austronesian verb-Initial languages and wh-question strategies. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(4). 737–771.
Potsdam, Eric & Polinsky, Maria. 2011. Questions and word order in Polynesian. In Moyse-Faurie, Claire & Sabel, Joachim (eds.), Topics in Oceanic morphosyntax, 83–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rackowski, Andrea. 2002. The structure of Tagalog: Specificity, voice, and the distribution of arguments. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Rackowski, Andrea & Richards, Norvin. 2005. Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4). 565–599.
Richards, Norvin. 2000. Another look at Tagalog subjects. In Paul, Ileana & Phillips, Vivianne & Travis, Lisa (eds.), Formal issues in Austronesian linguistics, 105–116. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2001. On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Cinque, Guglielmo & Salvi, Giampaolo (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 267–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1969. Guess who? In Binnick, Robert I. & Davidson, Alice & Green, Georgia M. & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. Radical pro drop and fusional pronominal morphology in colloquial Singapore English: Reply to Neeleman and Szendrői. Linguistic Inquiry 42(2). 356–365.
Shi, Chaokai. 2009. The linker tu in Isbukun Bunun. Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University. (Master’s thesis.)
Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2008.
Wh-movement and the syntax of sluicing. Journal of Linguistics 44(3). 677–722.
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Lipták, Anikó. 2006. The cross-linguistic syntax of sluicing: Evidence from Hungarian relatives. Syntax 9(3). 248–274.
. 2013. What sluicing can do, what it can’t and in which language: On the cross-linguistic syntax of ellipsis. In Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Corver, Norbert (eds.), Diagnosing syntax, 502–536. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wei, Ting-Chi. 2004. Predication and sluicing in Mandarin Chinese. Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2016. Argument-drop in Formosan languages: Pronominal morphology and discourse topic. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 46(3). 561–625.
Wu, Hsiao-hung Iris. 2009. Existential constructions in Isbukun Bunun. Oceanic Linguistics 48(2). 364–378.
