Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:4 (2018) ► pp.525–548

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Identifying lexical bundles in Chinese

Methodological issues and an exploratory data analysis

 | National Taipei University of Business
 | National Taiwan University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 10 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00019.hsu
Abstract
Recurrent word sequences, referred to as “lexical bundles”, may be structurally incomplete, but they serve important communicative functions. Despite the essential roles of lexical bundles in discourse, many methodological issues have been raised in the process of identifying lexical bundles, which is generally frequency-based. The present study identifies three-word and four-word bundles in Chinese conversation and news, and efforts are made to respond to methodological challenges encountered in previous studies. We employ a more sensitive dispersion measure, DP, and an internal association measure, G, which help filter out high-frequency word sequences with no identifiable function and reduce the workload of further manual interventions. An exploratory data analysis is then conducted to compare the distributional patterns of lexical bundles in Chinese conversation and news. In Chinese, both the type number and the density of lexical bundles are higher in conversation than in news. This appears to be a strong cross-linguistic tendency that reflects the real-time pressure speakers face in spontaneous speech. The exploratory data analysis also shows that the elements in Chinese bundles are closely associated with each other. This suggests that lexical bundles are useful phrasal units in Chinese discourse, and thus invites further investigations of how lexical bundles are used in Chinese.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodological issues in identifying lexical bundles
    • 2.1Issues relating to the corpus
    • 2.2Issues relating to the length of lexical bundles
    • 2.3Issues relating to the quantitative criteria
    • 2.4Issues relating to manual interventions
    • 2.5An interim summary
  • 3.Identifying lexical bundles in Chinese
    • 3.1Extracting high-frequency word sequences
    • 3.2Dispersion thresholds
    • 3.3Association threshold
    • 3.4Other methodological issues and practical solutions
  • 4.Results and discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Altenberg, Bengt & Eeg-Olofsson, Mats. 1990. Phraseology in spoken English: Presentation of a project. In Aarts, Jan & Meijs, Willem (eds.), Theory and practice in corpus linguistics, 1–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26(3). 263–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Johansson, Stig & Leech, Geoffrey & Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 1997. Repeated word combinations in spoken and written text: Some implications for functional grammar. In Butler, Christopher S. & Connolly, John H. & Gatward, Richard A. & Vismans, Roel M. (eds.), A fund of ideas: Recent developments in functional grammar (Studies in Language and Language Use 31), 60–77. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, John B. 1970. An alternative to Juilland’s usage coefficient for lexical frequencies and a proposal for a standard frequency index (SFI). Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior 3(2). 61–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Lin. 2010. An investigation of lexical bundles in ESP textbooks and electrical engineering introductory textbooks. In Wood, David (ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication, 107–125. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Yu-Hua & Baker, Paul. 2010. Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology 14(2). 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, Kathy & Schmitt, Norbert. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1). 72–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan & Biber, Douglas. 2004. The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica 201. 56–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2002. Lexical bundles in freshman composition. In Reppen, Randi & Fitzmaurice, Susan M. & Biber, Douglas (eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9), 131–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4). 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish. Corpora 3(1). 43–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana & Csomay, Eniko. 2007. Positioning lexical bundles in university lectures. In Campoy, Mari Carmen & Luzón, María José (eds.), Spoken corpora in applied linguistics (Linguistic Insights 51), 57–76. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2002. Lexical bundles in Early Modern English dialogues: A window into the speech-related language of the past. In Fanego, Teresa & Méndez-Naya, Belén & Seoane, Elena (eds.), Sounds, words, texts, and change, vol. 21 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224), 45–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. Dispersion and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 403–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: A practical introduction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1). 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 321. 150–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Institute of Information Science & CKIP Group in Academia Sinica. 2013. Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. 4th edn. ([URL]) (Accessed 2016-10-04.)
Jiang, Nan & Nekrasova, Tatiana M. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language Journal 91(3). 433–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2002. Discourse analysis (Introducing Linguistics). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, YouJin. 2009. Korean lexical bundles in conversation and academic texts. Corpora 4(2). 135–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna. 2012. Applications of the lexical bundles method in historical corpus research. In Pęzik, Piotr (ed.), Corpus data across languages and disciplines (Łódź Studies in Language 28), 83–95. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio. 2006. Corpus-based language studies: An advanced resource book (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Basturkmen, Helen. 2006. Lexical bundles and discourse signalling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3). 283–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne & McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 2007. From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan & Morley, John. 2004. At the heart of ideology: Word and cluster/bundle frequency in political debate. In Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (ed.), Practical applications in language and computers: PALC 2003 (Łódź Studies in Language 9), 179–192. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Syder, Frances Hodgetts. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, Jack C. & Schmidt, Richard W. (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Ellis, Nick C. 2010. An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4). 487–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2007. Quantitative data on multi-word sequences in English: The case of the word world. In Hoey, Michael & Mahlberg, Michaela & Stubbs, Michael & Teubert, Wolfgang (eds.), Text, discourse and corpora: Theory and analysis, 163–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1982. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58(1). 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2015. Profiling the Mandarin spoken vocabulary based on corpora. In Wang, William S-Y. & Sun, Chaofen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 336–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, Nicole & Cortes, Viviana & Biber, Douglas. 2007. Lexical bundles in speech and writing. In Parodi, Giovanni (ed.), Working with Spanish corpora (Research in Corpus and Discourse), 217–231. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tremblay, Antoine & Derwing, Bruce & Libben, Gary. 2009. Are lexical bundles stored and processed as single units? Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria 191. 258–279.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, Naixing & Li, Jingjie. 2013. A new computing method for extracting contiguous phraseological sequences from academic text corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4). 506–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, David. 2010. Lexical clusters in an EAP textbook corpus. In Wood, David (ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication, 88–106. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue