Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2018) ► pp.266–305

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Fragment questions in Mandarin Chinese

Topic movement and pied-piping

 | National Kaohsiung Normal University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 15 April 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00010.wei
Abstract
This paper argues that fragment question (FQ) in Mandarin Chinese is derived from topic movement and TP deletion, contributing to the growing body of evidence that sentence fragments are syntactically full clauses (. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 271. 661–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). Structurally, an FQ consists of a topic-like constituent followed by a particle ne, which functions as a topic marker and as a constituent question particle simultaneously. The fragment is argued to move to the SpecTopP rather than SpecFocP (Wei, Ting-Chi. 2013. Fragment question and ellipsis in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34(3). 151–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), because FQ exhibits topic properties and respects island effects such as the complex NP island and the adjunct island. However, it is insensitive to islands such as the sentential subject island and left branch condition. We propose that the absence of island effect can be attributed to the pied-piping of the entire topic-like island to the SpecTopP. In addition, the proposed analysis not only captures the ineligible FQs caused by intervention effect within the passive structures but also the eligible FQs induced by preposition drop in the language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Distribution
  • 3.Topic movement and TP ellipsis
    • 3.1Connectivity effects
    • 3.2The structure of the fragment question
      • 3.2.1 Merchant’s (2004) analysis
      • 3.2.2FQ in SpecTopP, not in SpecFocP
    • 3.3The licensing of ellipsis in FQ
    • 3.4Dual functions of ne
  • 4.Evidence for topic movement
    • 4.1Idiom chunks
    • 4.2Island-(in)sensitivity
      • 4.2.1Merchant’s island effect
      • 4.2.2Chinese FQ and island effect
      • 4.2.3Chinese FQ and island repair effect in disguise: Pied-piping
      • 4.2.4FQ in passives
  • 5.Preposition drop
  • 6.Conclusion
    • 6.1Summary
    • 6.2Typological implication
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (53)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2011. Don’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. London: University College London. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark. 2007. Deletion versus Pro-forms: A false dichotomy? New York: New York University. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Deletion versus pro-forms: An overly simple dichotomy? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(2). 381–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew & Elliott, Patrick & Thoms, Gary. 2014. There is no island repair. Newark/ London/Edinburgh: Rutgers University, University College London and University of Edinburgh. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(1). 43–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59(1). 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects and topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L. -S. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding (Studies in Generative Grammar 9). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger & Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 1997. Guanyue lilun yu Hanyu de beidongju [GB theory and passive sentences in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuyanxue Luncong [Studies in Chinese Linguistics] 1997(1). 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1). 143–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gasde, Horst-Dieter & Paul, Waltraud. 1996. Functional categories, topic prominence, and complex sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 34(2). 263–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gengel, Kirsten. 2013. Pseudogapping and ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gergel, Remus & Gengel, Kirsten & Winkler, Susanne. 2007. Ellipsis and inversion: A feature-based focus account. In Schwabe, Kerstin & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), On information structure, meaning, and form: Generalizations across languages (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100), 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3). 391–428.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29(4). 423–509.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Yafei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In Molnár, Valéria & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), The architecture of focus (Studies in Generative Grammar 82), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2009. Licensing ‘‘gapless’’ bei passives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18(2). 167–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming. 1982. You “fei-yiwen xingshi + ne” zaocheng de yiwenju [Wh-question in the form of non-question-type with ne]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 1982(6). 435–438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 271. 661–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Johnson, Kyle (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Three kinds of ellipsis. 2010. In Recanati, François & Stojanovic, Isidora & Villanueva, Neftalí (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective, and relativity (Mouton Series in Pragmatics 6), 141–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry L. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. In Kachru, Braj & Lees, Robert & Malkiel, Yakov & Pietrangeli, Angelina & Saporta, Sol. (eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, 719–751. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2011. ATB-topicalization in Mandarin Chinese: An intersective operator analysis. Linguistic Analysis 37(1–2). 231–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2002. Sentence-internal topics in Mandarin Chinese: The case of object preposing. Language and Linguistics 3(4). 695–714.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 331. 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 271). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Binnick, Robert I. & Davison, Alice & Green, Georgia M. & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 18–19, 1969, 252–286. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru & Lin, T. -H. Jonah & Murasugi, Keiko. 2008. N′-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(3). 247–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shao, Jingmin. 1996. Xiandai Hanyu yiwenju yanjiu [A study of interrogative sentences in Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2002. On the status of ‘modifying’ DE and the syntax of the Chinese DP. In Tang, Sze-Wing & Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther (eds.), On the formal way to Chinese languages, 74–101. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stjepanović, Sandra. 2012. Two cases of violation repair under sluicing. In Merchant, Jason & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), Sluicing: Cross-linguistic perspectives (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 38), 68–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1981. Compositionality in focus. Folia Linguistica 15(1–2). 141–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. Xingshi Hanyu jufaxue [Formal Chinese syntax]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Ting-chi. 1989. Hanyu cifa jufa xuji [Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax II]. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ting, Jen. 1995. A non-uniform analysis of the passive construction in Mandarin Chinese. Rochester: University of Rochester. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(2). 83–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2004. Ellipsis in Dutch dialects (LOT Dissertation Series 96). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1(3). 255–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, Ting-Chi. 2013. Fragment question and ellipsis in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34(3). 151–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Fragment answers in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3(1). 100–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa jiangyi [Lecture notes on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Stigliano, Laura
2025. Mixed-identity requirements in ellipsis: the case of topic-remnant elided questions in Spanish. Syntactic Theory and Research DOI logo
Yang, Xiaolong & Yong Zhou
2022. Fragment questions in Chinese: At the syntax-pragmatics interface. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:4 ► pp. 957 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Ting-Chi
2020. The Structure of Split Questions in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Jackie Yan-Ki
2019. Parallel copying in dislocation copying: evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:3 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue