Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp.156–195
The scope of even
Evidence from Mandarin Chinese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 5 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00006.shy
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00006.shy
Abstract
One of the issues in the study of even is concerned with the ambiguous scope interpretations contributed by the focus adverb even. There have been two main camps: the lexical approach and the scope approach. Unlike English, which does not have distinct lexical items for even, Mandarin Chinese (Chinese hereafter) utilizes two constructions to express the notion of even: (1) The lian … dou ‘including … all’ construction, and (2) focus adverbs, such as shenzhi. This paper aims to demonstrate that the lian … dou construction expresses the typical implicatures in even sentences predicted by the scope theory. The seemingly deviant cases that have been argued for a lexical NPI even by Rooth, however, either are not construed in lian … dou sentences or are possibly rendered in shenzhi sentences provided by the pragmatic accommodation of existential presuppositions. In particular, dou syntactically marks focus scope and quantifies over a focus domain consisting of the focused phrase and its alternatives in presupposition. The results of this study thus shed further light on the general discussion of even in the sense that: on the one hand, the scope theory can make the right predictions, as evidenced by lian … dou; and, on the other hand, pragmatic scalar inference of the existential implicatures should be taken into consideration. Ultimately the expression of even manifests interfaces of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics.
Keywords:
even
, scope theory, lexical theory, negative polarity item, scalar implicature, presupposition
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Ambiguity in even sentences
- 2.1The lexical theory
- 2.2The scope theory reinvented
- 3.Chinese lian … dou and shenzhi
- 4.The syntactic scope of lian … dou
- 4.1Scope marking of dou
- 4.2 Lian … dou in downward entailing context
- 4.3 Even-DP in non-finite complement clause
- 5.A discussion of existential presupposition
- 5.1 Even- VP fixed scope?
- 5.2Lian … dou vs. shenzhi
- 5.2.1Quantifier scope
- 5.3A residual issue on even in non-finite complement clause
- 5.4Focus range of shenzhi
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (78)
Altmann, Hans. 1976. Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik [
The gradparticles in German: Studies on their syntax, semantics and pragmatics
]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Badan, Linda. 2008. The even-construction in Mandarin. In Djamouri, Redouane & Meisterernst, Barbara & Sybesma, Rint (eds.), Chinese linguistics in Leipzig, 101–116. Paris: EHESS/CRLAO.
Badan, Linda & Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2015. The even-construction and the low periphery in Mandarin Chinese. In Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax: The cartography of syntactic structures (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), vol. 111, 33–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Vicente, Luis. 2013. Verb doubling in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22(1). 1–37.
Constant, Noah & Gu, Chloe C. 2010. Mandarin ‘even’, ‘all’ and the trigger of focus movement. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(1). (Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium). 21–30.
. 1975b. Polarity and the scale principle. In Grossman, Robin E. & San, L. James & Vance, Timothy J. (eds.), Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–199. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.
Francescotti, Robert. 1995. Even: The conventional implicature approach reconsidered. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(2). 153–173.
Gao, Qian. 1994. Focus criterion: Evidence from Chinese. In Camacho, José & Choueiri, Lina (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 51–73. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. Polarity, questions, and the scalar properties of even
. In Ward, Gregory & Birner, Maria (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 95–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 2006. (In)Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 231. 135–183.
Grano, Thomas Angelo. 2013. Control without finiteness contrasts: PRO, aspect, and complementation size in Mandarin Chinese. ([URL]) (Accessed 2016-08-23.)
Hasegawa, Nobuko. 1991. Affirmative polarity items and negation in Japanese. In Georgopoulos, Carol & Ishihara, Roberta (eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, 271–285. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hoeksema, Jack & Rullmann, Hotze. 2001. Scalarity and polarity: A study of scalar adverbs as polarity items. In Hoeksema, Jack & Rullmann, Hotze & Sánchez-Valencia, Víctor & van der Wouden, Ton (eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items, 129–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hole, Daniel P. 2004. Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yĕ. London: Routledge Curzon.
Hu, Jianhua & Pan, Haihua & Xu, Liejiong. 2001. Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics 39(6). 1117–1148.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. & Safir, Kenneth J. (eds.), The null subject parameter (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15), 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Huang, Shi-Zhe. 1996. Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of Dou. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar (Current Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Jiang, Jingzhong, & Pan, Haihua. 2013. “Dou” de yuyi fenhe ji jieshi guize [How many DOUs do we really need?]. Zhongguo Yuwen [
Studies of the Chinese Language
] 2013(1). 38–50.
Karttunen, Lauri & Peters, Stanley. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Oh, Choon-Kyu & Dinneen, David A. (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Presupposition, vol. 111, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.
. 2006. Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics 16), 675–700. Malden: Blackwell.
König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. New York: Routledge.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. The representation of focus. In von Stechow, Arnim & Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 825–834. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krifka, Manfred. 1991. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Moore, Steven & Wyner, Adam Zachary (eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory I (Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 10), 127–158. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Kuo, Chin-Man. 2003. The fine structure of negative polarity items in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Ladusaw, William A. 1996. Negation and polarity items. In Lappin, Shalom (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (Blackwell Handbook in Linguistics 3), 321–341. London: Blackwell.
Language and Knowledge Processing Group. 1994–2013. Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese. Taipei: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica.
Lee, Thomas Hun-tak. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1985. Abstract case in Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Liao, Wei-wen Roger. 2016. The top-down and bottom-up ways of getting EVEN in Chinese. (Paper presented at the 11th Workshop on Formal Syntax and Semantics (FOSS-11), Taipei, 2 September 2016.)
Lin, Jo-wang. 1998. Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6(2). 201–243.
Liu, Hongni. 2009. Hanyu fei jufa jiegou de cihuihua [
The lexicalization of the non-syntactic structures in Chinese
]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lü, Shuxiang. 1946/1990. Cong zhuyu binyu de fenbie tandao Guoyu juzi de fenxi [From the distinction between subject and object to the analysis of Mandarin sentences]. Lü Shuxiang wenji [
The collected works of Lü Shuxiang
], vol. 21, 445–480. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
(ed.). 1999. Xiandai Hanyu babai ci [
Eight hundred words in Modern Chinese
]. Revised edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Ma, Zhen. 1982. Shuo ‘ye’ [Talking about ‘ye’]. Zhongguo Yuwen [
Studies of the Chinese Language
] 1982(4). 283–287.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move?: Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2012. The scope of even and quantifier raising. Natural Language Semantics 20(2). 115–136.
Pai, Meing-Hsien. 2013. “Lian” ziju de lishi yanbian yanjiu [
A study on the historical evolution of “lian” construction
]. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Master’s thesis.)
Paris, Marie-Claude. 1979. Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the “lian…ye/dou” construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de linguistique-Asie orientale 5(1). 47–70.
. 1994. The interaction between focus operators and types of VPs in Mandarin. (Paper presented at the 6th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Los Angeles, 13–15 May 1994.)
Rooth, Mats Edward. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In Lappin, Shalom (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (Blackwell Handbook in Linguistics 3), 271–297. London: Blackwell.
Rullmann, Hotze. 1997.
Even, polarity, and scope. In Gibson, Martha & Wiebe, Grace & Libben, Gary (eds.), Papers in experimental and theoretical linguistics, vol. 41, 40–64. Edmonton: Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta.
Sells, Peter. 2011. How negation scopes in Japanese and Korean. In McClure, William & den Dikken, Marcel (eds.), Japanese and Korean linguistics 18, 328–344. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2004. (A)symmetries between Mandarin Chinese lian…dou and shenzhi
. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 32(1). 81–128.
. 2014. Topic and focus. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Simpson, Andrew (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 100–125. Malden: Blackwell.
Sybesma, Rint. 1996. Review of “The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese” by Shyu Shu-ing. GLOT International 21. 13–14.
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Tang, Ting-chi. 2000. Hanyu de “xianding ziju” yu “feixianding ziju” [Finite and nonfinite clauses in Chinese]. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 191–214.
Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2004. Tan ZHI yu LIAN de xingshi yuyi [On formal semantics of zhi and lian in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [
Studies of the Chinese Language
] 2004(2). 99–111.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1994. Zailun huati he lian…dou/ye jiegou [More on topic and lian…dou/ye construction]. In Tai, James & Xue, Feng-Sheng (eds.), Gongneng zhuyi yu Hanyu yufa [
Functionalism and Chinese grammar
], 95–116. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
Ussery, Cherlon & Ding, Lydia & Liu, Yining Rebecca. 2016. The typology of Mandarin infinitives. In Farrell, Patrick (ed.), Proceedings of Linguistic Society of America, vol. 1 (2016). 28: 1–15.
von Stechow, Arnim. 1991. Current issues in the theory of focus. In von Stechow, Arnim & Wunderlich, Dieter (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 804–825. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Wang, Yu-Fang Flora & Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 1996. A syntactic study of the Chinese negative polarity items renhe
. Cahiers de linguistique-Asie Orientale 25(1). 35–62.
Xiang, Ming. 2008. Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou
. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(3). 227–245.
Xu, Liejiong & Liu, Danqing. 2007. Huati de jiegou yu gongneng [
Topic: Structural and functional analysis
]. Revised edn. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
Yuan, Yulin. 2005. “Dou” de yuyi gongneng he guanlian fangxiang xinjie [A new explanation of the semantic function and association direction of dou
]. Zhongguo Yuwen [
Studies of the Chinese Language
] 2005(2). 99–109.
. 2008. Fan yuqi, dijin guanxi he yuyong chidu de leixing – shenzhi he faner de yuyi gongneng bijiao [Counter-expectation, additive relation and the types of pragmatic scale: The comparative analyses of the semantic function of shenzhi and faner
]. Dangdai Yuyanxue [
Contemporary Linguistics
] 2008(2).109–121.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Cao, Huacheng
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
