Article published In: Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp.80–116
The partial productivity of schematic idioms in Chinese
Evidence from speakers’ judgment
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 5 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00004.liu
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00004.liu
Abstract
Idiomatic expressions are generally manifested as lexically fixed. Yet some expressions allow lexical variations in their open slots and thus show certain degree of productivity in actual use. How young children acquire the productive use of idiomatic expressions, however, has rarely been addressed in current literature. The present study explores the developmental trajectory in learning idiom productivity by targeting the quadra-syllabic schematic idioms in Chinese. Results of two Graded Acceptability Judgment tests showed that acquisition of the selective productivity of schematic idioms may undergo an interactive process shaped by its token frequency, structural complexity, inherent semantic relation and the chunk effect of its open morphemes at different age levels. Findings in the studies are further discussed in relation to the emergentist model in idiom learning.
Keywords: schematic idioms, partial productivity, emergentist
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Chinese schematic idioms
- 1.2Learning of constructional idioms – Usage-based account
- 2.Distributional analysis of schematic patterns in Chinese – XAXB, XAYB and AXBY constructions
- 2.1XAXB construction
- 2.2XAYB construction
- 2.3AXBY construction
- 3.Current study
- 3.1Study One
- 3.1.1Variables
- 3.1.2Materials
- 3.1.3Participants
- 3.1.4Procedure
- 3.1.5 Scoring
- 3.1.6Results
- 3.1.7Discussion of Study One
- 3.2Study Two
- 3.2.1Variables
- 3.2.2Materials
- 3.2.3Participants
- 3.2.4Procedure
- 3.2.5Results
- 3.2.6Discussion of Study Two
- 3.1Study One
- 4.General discussion
- 4.1Input frequency
- 4.2Structural complexity and internal semantic relation
- 4.3Chunk effect of open morphemes
- 4.4Empirical evidence of schematic idioms as constructions
- 4.5Emergentist model on idiom learning
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Abbreviations
References
References (57)
Ahrens, Kathleen. 1995. The meaning of double object construction in Chinese. In Camacho, Jose & Choueiri, Lina (eds.), Proceedings of NACCL 6, vol. 11, 1–14. Los Angeles: GSIL Publications.
Ambridge, Ben & Theakston, Anna L. & Lieven, Elena V. M. & Tomasello, Michael. 2006. The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development 21(2). 174–193.
Ambridge, Ben & Kidd, Evan & Rowland, Caroline F. & Theakston, Anna L. 2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 239–273.
Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bock, Kathryn J. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3). 355–387.
Bowerman, Melissa & Croft, William. 2008. The acquisition of the English causative alternation. In Bowerman, Melissa & Brown, Penelope (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 279–307. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bybee, Joan. 1998. The emergent lexicon. In Gruber, M. Catherine & Higgins, Derrick & Olson, Kenneth S. & Wysocki, Tamra (eds.), CLS 34–2: The panels, 421–435. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J. (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cacciari, Cristina & Levorato, Maria Chiara. 1989. How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language 16(2). 387–405.
Cain, Kate & Oakhill, Jane & Lemmon, Kate. 2005. The relation between children’s reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 90(1). 65–87.
CCL, 2003–2016. Beijing Daxue Zhongguo Yuyanxue Yanjiu Zhongxin: Xiandai Hanyu Yuliaoku [
Center for Chinese Linguistics PKU: Corpus of Modern Mandarin Chinese
] ([URL]) (Accessed 2016-06-01.)
Chen, Helen Kai-yun. 2001. A construction grammar approach to Chinese four-character idiomatic expressions. Taipei: National Taiwan University. (Master’s thesis.)
Ching, Eugene. 1964. Four-syllable expressions in Chinese (Issue 7 of Report, Ohio State University Project on Linguistic Analysis). Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation.
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 1999. The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 543–571.
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael. 2005. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81(4). 882–906.
Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 143–188.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.
Gan, Lihao. 2008. “Bu A bu B” de goushiyi yu yuyi de xiaojiqingxiang – jiyu renzhi yu yuyong de fenxi [Constructional meaning and pragmatic tendency of bu-A-bu-B pattern]. Xiuci Xuexi [
Rhetoric Learning
] 2008(2). 56–60.
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1987. Linguistic factors in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Child Language 14(3). 569–586.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Nayak, Nandini P. 1989. Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology 21(1). 100–138.
Glucksberg, Sam. 1993. Idiom meanings and allusional content. In Cacciari, Cristina & Tabossi, Patrizia (eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation, 3–26. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2005. Argument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Fried, Mirjam (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2013. Constructionist approaches. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–31. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. & Casenhiser, Devin. 2008. Construction learning and second language acquisition. In Robinson, Peter & Ellis, Nick C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 197–215. New York: Routledge.
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language – Advanced). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hsieh, Shelley Ching-Yu & Hsu, Chun-Chieh Natalie. 2010. Idiom comprehension in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 39(6). 505–522.
Ji, Meng. 2007. From etymology to modern phraseology: A corpus-based study of structural variants of Chinese idioms in naturally-occurring contexts. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 17(2). 67–82.
Kaschak, Michael P. & Glenberg, Arthur M. 2000. Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3). 508–529.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. 1963. Semantic interpretation of idioms and sentences containing them. In Zimmermann, Henry J. & Harvey, George G. (eds.), Quarterly Progress Report No. 70 (MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics), 275–282.
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles J. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1). 1–33.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–64. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Laval, Virginie. 2003. Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics 35(5). 723–739.
Levorato, Maria Chiara & Cacciari, Cristina. 1992. Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: The role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language 19(2). 415–433.
Lieven, Elena V. & Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In Robinson, Peter & Ellis, Nick C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 168–196. New York: Routledge.
Liu, Li & Cheung, Hin Tat. 2014. Acquisition of Chinese quadra-syllabic idiomatic expressions: Effects of semantic opacity and structural symmetry. First Language 34(4). 336–353.
Liu, Ying & Peng, Danling. 1997. Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In Chen, Hsuan-Chih (ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages, 219–232. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
McGlone, Mathew S. & Glucksberg, Sam & Cacciari, Cristina. 1994. Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes 17(2). 167–190.
Moon, Rosamund. 1998. Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach (Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Myers, James. 2006. Processing Chinese compounds: A survey of the literature. In Libben, Gary & Jarema, Gonia (eds.), The representation and processing of compound words, 169–196. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nippold, Marilyn A. & Duthie, Jill K. 2003. Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46(4). 788–799.
Nippold, Marilyn A. & Martin, Stephanie Tarrant. 1989. Idiom interpretation in isolation versus context: A developmental study with adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 32(1). 59–66.
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: W. Morrow & Co.
Theakston, Anna L. 2004. The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks. Cognitive Development 19(1). 15–34.
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74(3). 209–253.
. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, Michael & Brooks, Patricia J. 1998. [URL]. Cognitive Linguistics 9(4). 379–395.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
