Cover not available

In:Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 264–289

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 11
“And yet it moves”

Finding a place for phonology in the GenSLA cosmos

 | University of Victoria
Published online: 17 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.11arc
Abstract
The study of Lx phonology is under-represented in the GenSLA literature. I argue that this is largely because the complex learnability issues in the phonological domain have been under-appreciated. Drawing on examples from features and syllables, I illustrate that the acquisition of phonology is subject to poverty of the stimulus effects. Consequently, it follows that phonological representations are learned and not merely noticed in the environment. Furthermore, phonological grammars are shown to be generative, and hierarchical. By adopting abstract representational models we can both describe and explain learner behaviour. I explore the role of phonology in morphological and syntactic interfaces, and conclude with a discussion of real-world implications with regard to pronunciation training, and broader societal concerns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Phonology is generative
    • 1.2Phonology is learned (not noticed)
    • 1.3Phonology is hierarchical
  • 2.Learning phonology
    • 2.1The acquisition of features
    • 2.2Feature hierarchies
    • 2.3CH redeployment
  • 3.Holistic approaches
  • 4.Illusory vowels
  • 5.Structure and markedness
  • 6.Stress
  • 7.Interfaces
    • 7.1Phonology/morphology interface
    • 7.2Phonology/syntax interface
  • 8.Broadening circles
    • 8.1Pedagogic utility
    • 8.2Social justice
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (114)
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., & Lohndal, T. (2018). Units of language mixing: A cross-linguistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1719. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1993a). Language learnability and L2 phonology: The acquisition of metrical parameters. Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993b). The learnability of English metrical parameters by adult Spanish speakers. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 31(2), 129–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Second language phonology as redeployment of phonological knowledge. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 50(1–4), 285–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Reverse engineering the L1 filter: Bagging the elusive construct of intake frequency. Plenary speaker at New Sounds conference at Concordia in Montreal.
(2014). Did he say wet, when, or went? Second language learners and consonant clusters. TESL Ontario Contact, November.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Phonology at the interface: Late insertion and spell out in L2 morphophonology. Paper presented at News Sounds 2016, Aarhus, Denmark, June.
(2021). Speaking and hearing with an accent. Frontiers for Young Minds: Understanding Neuroscience, 9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022a). Feature dependency and the poverty of the stimulus in the acquisition of L2 German plural allomorphy. In T. Leal, E. Shimanskya, & C. Isabelli (Eds.), Generative SLA in the age of minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond. Selected proceedings of the 15th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 117–136). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022b). Mix and match: Why phonology matches syntax but not morphology in intraword codeswitching. Poster at the Mental Lexicon conference. Niagara-on-the-Lake. October.
(2023). Using a contrastive hierarchy to formalize structural similarity as I-proximity in L3 phonology. In N. Kolb, N. Mitrofanova, & M. Westergaard, (Eds.), Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13(5), 614–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Phonology in multilingual grammars: Representational complexity and linguistic interfaces. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). A transition theory of L3 segmental phonology: Phonological features and phonetic variation in multilingual grammars. In E. Babatsouli (Ed.), Multilingual acquisition and learning: Towards an eco-systemic View of diversity. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibald, J., & Croteau, N. (2021). Acquisition of L2 Japanese WH questions: Evidence of phonological contiguity and non-shallow structures. Second Language Research 37(4), 649–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibald, J., O’Brien, M. & Sewell, A. (2021). L2 phonology meets L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Communication: Language Sciences, 6, 804062. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archibald, J., Yousefi, M., & Alhemaid, A. (2022). Redeploying appendices in L2 phonology: Illusory vowels in L1 Persian and Arabic acquisition of English sC initial clusters. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 4(1), 76–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barriuso, T. A., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2018). High variability phonetic training as a bridge from research to practice. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 177–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beretta, A., Fiorentino, R. & Poeppel, D. (2005). The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 57–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berwick, R., Friederici, A., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J. (2013). Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Science 17(2), 89–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–206). York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68(4), 706–755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2011). A programme for bidirectional phonology and phonetics and their acquisition and evolution. In A. Benz & J. Mattausch (Eds.), Bidirectional optimality theory (pp. 33–72). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., Chládková, K., & Benders, T. (2022). Phonological features emerge substance-freely from the phonetics and the morphology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 67(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohn, G. P., & Santos, R. (2018). The acquisition of pre-tonic vowels in Brazilian Portuguese. Alfa, 62(1), 191–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bromberger, S., & Halle, M. (1989). Why phonology is different. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(1), 51–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broselow, E., & Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7(1), 35–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 4–63). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, W. (2008). The development of sC onset clusters in interlanguage: Markedness versus frequency effects. In R. Slabakova, J. Rothman, P. Kempchinsky, & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007) (pp. 15–29). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Teaching foreign sC onset clusters. In K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, M. Wrembel, & M. Kul (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in second language acquisition of speech (pp. 29–40). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, W., John, P., & French, L. (2009). The perception of sC onset clusters in second language phonology: A variationist perspective. In B. Baptista, A. Rauber, & M. Watkins (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp. 203–233). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso W., Collins, L., & Cardoso, W. (2021). Developmental sequences in second language phonology: Effects of instruction on the acquisition of foreign sC onsets. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 662934. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, W., & Liakin, D. (2009). When input frequency patterns fail to drive learning: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese English. In B. Baptista, A. Rauber, & M. Watkins (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production (pp. 174–202). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlisle, R. (2006). The sonority cycle and the acquisition of complex onsets. In B. Baptista & M. Watkins (Eds.) English with a Latin beat – Studies in Portuguese/Spanish English interphonology (pp. 105–137) Johns Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, M. (2019). Now you hear it, now you don’t: Malleable illusory vowel effects in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1101–1122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cebrian, J., & Carlet, A. (2014). Second-language learners’ identification of target-language phonemes: A short-term phonetic study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 474–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. South End Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2017). Critical commentary: Some notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowper, E., & Hall, D. C. (2019). Scope variation in contrastive hierarchies of morphosyntactic features. In D. W. Lightfoot & J. Havenhill (Eds.), Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition (pp. 27–41). Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummings, A., Wu, Y., & Ogiela, D. (2021). Phonological underspecification: An explanation for how a rake can become awake. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 585817. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, L., & Wilson, C. (2016). Processing nonnative consonant clusters in the classroom: Perception and production of phonetic detail. Second Language Research, 32(4), 471–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delgado, R, Cabrelli, J., & López, L. (2022). Code-switching in the phonological word. Paper presented at the UIC Bilingualism Forum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J. & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language 41(4), 496–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresher, E. (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge University Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The arch not the stones: Universal feature theory without universal features. Nordlyd, 41(2), 165–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Contrastive hierarchy theory and the nature of features. In W. Bennett, L. Hracs, & D. Storoshenko (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 18–29). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, L., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1568–1578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durvasula, K., & Kahng, J. (2015). Illusory vowels in perceptual epenthesis: The role of phonological alternations. Phonology, 32(3), 385–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (1990). A theory of second language acquisition within the framework of natural phonology. Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckman, F. (1991). The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(1), 23–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckman, F., & Iverson, G. (1997). Structure preservation in interlanguage phonology. In S. J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition. John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland, (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischhacker, H. (2001). Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 71–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In W. Rutherford & M. Hines (Eds.), On TESOL’81 (pp. 129–139). TESOL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E. (1978). Patterned phonetic variability in second-language speech: A gradual diffusion model. Canadian Modern Language Review 34(3), 335–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goad, H. (2012). sC Clusters are (almost always) coda-initial. The Linguistic Review, 29(3), 335–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Poot, A. (2004). Spanish rhymes: A challenge to constraints on syllable structure. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 25(1), 109–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Poot, A. (2011). Conflict resolution in the Spanish SLA of Yucatec ejectives: L1, L2, and universal constraints (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Calgary.
González Poot, A. (2014). Conflict resolution in the Spanish L2 acquisition of Yucatec ejectives: L1, L2 and universal constraints. In The Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
Gordon, M. (2006). Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, typology. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, D. C. (2017). Contrastive specification in phonology. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayter, E., & Archibald, J. (2022). Why high-variability phonetic training works: A phonological account. Poster presented at the Bilingualism Forum, October. University of Chicago at Illinois.
Hestvik, A., & Durvasula, K. (2016). Neurobiological evidence for voicing underspecification in English. Brain & Language 152, 28–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, M., & Roeder, R. (2022). Phonological mergers have systemic phonetic consequences: Palm, trees, and the Low Back Merger Shift. Language Variation and Change 34(1), 29–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson G., & Salmons, J. (1995). Aspiration and laryngeal features in Germanic. Phonology, 12(3), 369–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, S., & Archibald, J. (2010). Phonological representations and perception of L2 contrasts. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul, & K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010 (pp. 161–170). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabak, B. (2019). A dynamic equational approach to sound patterns in language change and second-language acquisition: The (un)stability of English dental fricatives illustrated. In B. Busse & R. Moehlig-Falke (Eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept (pp. 221–254). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabak, B., & Idsardi, W. (2007). Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: Syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints? Language and Speech, 50(1), 23–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kijak, A. (2009). How stressful is L2 stress? LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lleó, C., & Vogel, I. (2004). Learning new segments and reducing domains in German L2 phonology: The role of the prosodic hierarchy. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(1), 79–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L. (2020). Bilingual grammar: Toward an integrated model. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L., Alexiadou, A., & Veenstra, T. (2017). Code-switching by phase. Languages, 2(9). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M., Flege, J. E., & Mackay, I. (1996). The effects of age of second language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17(3), 313–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Natvig, D., & Salmons, J. (2021). Connecting structure and variation in sound change. Cadernos de Lingüistica, 2(1), 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford, W. (2015). Patterns of contrast in phonological change: Evidence from Algonquian vowel systems. Language, 91(2), 308–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö. (2021). L2 acquisition of a complex stress pattern: UG-constrained learning paths in Khalkha Mongolian. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 12, 627797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Özçelik, Ö., & Sprouse, R. (2016). Emergent knowledge of a universal phonological principle in the L2 acquisition of vowel harmony in Turkish: A ‘four’-fold poverty of the stimulus in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 33(2), 179–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Purnell, T. (2022). Dialect vowel variation reflects phonology: Evidence from American Dialect Society publications. Talk at the University of Victoria.
Pylkkänen, L., Llinás, R., & Murphy, G. (2006). The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 97–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reiss, C. (2017). Substance free phonology. In S. J. Hannahs & A. Bosch (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonological theory. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reiss, C., & Volenec, V. (2022). Conquer primal fear: Phonological features are innate and substance-free. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 67(4), 581–610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhodes, R., Avcu, E., Han, C., & Hestvik, A. (2022). Auditory predictions are phonological when phonetic information is variable. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(9). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, N. (2010). Uttering trees. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Contiguity theory. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rochet, B. (1995). Perception and production of second-language speech sounds by adults. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 379–410). York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. (2020). Refining representations for L2 phonology. Second Language Research, 36(4), 691–707. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax-phonology interface. In J. Goldsmith, J Riggle, A. C. L. Yu (Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanich, S., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2018). Phonological factors of Spanish/English word-internal code-switching. In L. López (Ed.), Code-switching – Experimental answers to theoretical questions. In honor of Kay González-Vilbazo (pp. 195–222). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanich, S., Cabrelli, J., Hilderman, D., & Archibald, J. (2019). The morphophonology of intraword codeswitching: Representation and processing. Frontiers in Communication: Language Sciences, 4, 54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevens, K., & Keyser, J. (1989). Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language, 65, 81–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tetzloff, K. (2022). Examining variability in Spanish monolingual and bilingual phonotactics: A look at sC-clusters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Tremblay, A., & Coughlin, C. (2017). Cue-weighting mechanism and bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 708–709. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755–803. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Input processing in SLA. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, commentary (pp. 5–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leussen, J.-W., & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinberger, S. (1988). Theoretical foundations of second language phonology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.
Westergaard, M. (2021). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 397–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, K,. & Culicover, P. (1983). Formal principles of language acquisition. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, R. (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchener, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 34–57). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, J. (2021). A contrastive hierarchy analysis of the Mandarin vowel system. Canadian Linguistics Association Conference.
Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J. (2017). The growth of language: Universal Grammar, experience, and principles of computation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(B), 103–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (1993). The acquisition of prosodic structure in a second language. Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue