Cover not available

In:Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 172–196

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Structural change and ambiguity resolution in L2 learners of English

 | 1Purdue University | 2University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign | 3University of Pittsburgh
Published online: 17 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.07fan
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of structural changes for verbs in second language (L2) ambiguity resolution. Two types of verbs were examined: those taking a noun phrase (NP) or no complements (Z) (e.g., to type, NP/Z verbs), and those taking either an (NP) or a sentence (S) (e.g., to understand, NP/S verbs). A self-paced reading experiment found that Chinese-speaking learners of English, like first-language (L1) English speakers, took longer to process disambiguating regions in ambiguous sentences compared to corresponding regions in unambiguous sentences. Moreover, NP/Z verbs posed greater difficulty than NP/S verbs, especially in ambiguous sentences, for both speaker groups. This suggests a garden-path effect in learners, indicating that structural information from verbs influences L2 processing similarly to L1 processing.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Structural change and principle-based parsing
  • 3.The present study
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Experimental design and stimuli
      • 4.2.1Sentence completion norming
      • 4.2.2Plausibility norming
      • 4.2.3Main experiment
        • 4.2.3.1Procedure
          • 4.2.3.1.1Language background questionnaire
          • 4.2.3.1.2Self-paced reading
          • 4.2.3.1.3English proficiency test
          • 4.2.3.1.4Acceptability judgment task
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Data treatment
    • 5.2Statistical modeling
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Results of the sentence completion norming task
    • 6.2Results of the plausibility norming task
    • 6.3Results of the main experiment
      • 6.3.1Acceptability judgments
      • 6.3.2Reading times from the SPR task
        • 6.3.2.1Critical region (region 3)
        • 6.3.2.2Spillover region (region 4)
  • 7.General discussion
    • 7.1On the L1 group data
    • 7.2On the L2 group data
  • 8.Conclusion and future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1984). Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13(4), 307–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Seo, H. K. (2017). Transitivity in the processing of intransitive clauses: A category-based prediction in low-intermediate learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 527–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., & Arche, M. J. (2021). The ‘comparative logic’ and why we need to explain interlanguage grammars. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 717635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008). Spanish – English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta psychologica, 128(3), 501–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., Marful, A., Gerfen, C., & Molina, M. T. B. (2010). Usage frequencies of complement-taking verbs in Spanish and English: Data from Spanish monolinguals and Spanish – English bilinguals. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1004–1011. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, S., & Wu, Z. (2024). Syntactic prediction in L2 learners: evidence from English disjunction processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(2), 429-456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 50(1), 119–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garnsey, S. M., Lotocky, M. A., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Myers, E. M. (1997a). Argument structure frequency biases for 100 sentence-complement-taking verbs |(|Unpublished manuscript). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997b). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 58–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (2006). Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(3), 425–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object – subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 129–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 907–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. (2012). The processing of subject – object ambiguities in native and near-native Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 721–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Self-paced reading. In J. Jegerski & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (1998). Main verb versus reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in L2 sentence processing. Language Learning, 48(1), 107–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2), 199–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Fang, S. (2022). A generative approach to the instructed second language acquisition of Spanish se. Language Learning, 72(S1), 83-124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language learning, 46(2), 283–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lau, J. H., Clark, A., & Lappin, S. (2017). Grammaticality, acceptability, and probability: A probabilistic view of linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Science, 41(5), 1202–1241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, E. K., Lu, D. H. Y., & Garnsey, S. M. (2013). L1 word order and sensitivity to verb bias in L2 processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 761–775. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means aka Least-Squares Means. R package (Version 1.7.0). Retrieved on 15 May 2022 from [URL]
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed‐effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 185–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language Learner. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicklin, C., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Outliers in L2 research in applied linguistics: A synthesis and data re-analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 26–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 940. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: a visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 636–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qian, Z., Lee, E. K., Lu, D. H. Y., & Garnsey, S. M. (2019). Native and non-native (L1-Mandarin) speakers of English differ in online use of verb-based cues about sentence structure. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 897–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Roberts, L., & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Román, P. E., Ray, N. R., Contemori, C., Kaan, E., & Dussias, P. E. (2013). The role of verb bias and plausibility in the resolution of temporarily ambiguous sentences: An ERP study with English speakers. Poster presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Román, P., Kaan, E., & Dussias, P. E. (2022). Access to verb bias and plausibility information during syntactic processing in adult Spanish – English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 417–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Şafak, D. F., & Hopp, H. (2022). Verb bias and semantic persistence effects in L2 ambiguity resolution. Second Language Research, 38(4), 705–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S. M. (2019). Using judgments in second language acquisition research. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprouse, J. (2018). Acceptability judgments and grammaticality, prospects and challenges. Syntactic structures after 60 years (pp. 195–224). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 136–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Gompel, R. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Syntactic parsing. In S.-A. Rueschemeyer & M. Gareth Gaskell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 289–307). Oxford Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 225–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D. A., François, R., … & Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. N., Möbius, P., & Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 509–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, M. P., & Garnsey, S. M. (2009). Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(3), 368–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witzel, J., Witzel, N., & Nicol, J. (2012). Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 419–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue