Cover not available

In:Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 134–169

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
L2 acquisition of English flexible count and flexible mass nouns by L1-Japanese and L1-Spanish speakers

 | Gunma Prefectural Women’s University
 | Gunma Prefectural Women’s University
 | Gunma Prefectural Women’s University
Published online: 17 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.06sna
Abstract
We examine the acquisition of the English count-mass distinction, in particular flexible nouns. Certain nouns are flexible in English as they can be either countable like a cake / cakes or mass such as cake. Our study is unique regarding the off-line and on-line tasks used and the L2 participant groups. We administered a quantity judgement task and a self-paced reading task to L1-Japanese and L1-Spanish speakers who judged four conditions – Count, Object, Substance and Flexible. The findings show that both L1-Japanese and L1-Spanish speakers performed differently on both tasks from the native speaker controls. We argue that the results of the self-paced reading task are inconsistent with the claims made by the Morphological Congruency Hypothesis (Jiang et al., 2011).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Count-mass nouns in English, Japanese, and Spanish
  • 3.L2 acquisition studies of the English count-mass distinction
    • 3.1L2 processing and the Morphological Congruency Hypothesis
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Quantity Judgement Task (QJT)
    • 4.3Self-paced reading task
    • 4.4Procedure
    • 4.5QJT results
    • 4.6SPRT Results
  • 5.Discussion and summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (28)
References
Amuzie, G. L., & Spinner, P. (2013). Korean EFL learners’ indefinite article use with four types of abstract nouns. Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 415–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 89–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busby, N. L., & Dahl, A. (2021). Reading rate of academic English texts: Comparing L1 and advanced L2 users in different language environments. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 20(1), 36–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174(1), 99–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S. H., & Ionin, T. (2021). What’s the smallest part of spinach? A new experimental approach to the count/mass distinction. Proceedings of ELM 1, 113–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S. H., Ionin, T., & Zhu, Y. (2018). L1 Korean and L1 Mandarin L2 English learners’ acquisition of the count/mass distinction in English. Second Language Research, 34(2), 147–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Some notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goto, K., Maki, H., & Kasai, C. (2010). The Minimal English Test: A new method to measure English as a second language proficiency. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(2), 91–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiki, M. (1990). The judgment of noun countability by Japanese college students: Where is the difficulty? JACET Bulletin, 21, 19–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2015). Semantics and morphosyntax in L2 predictive sentence processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53(3), 277–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hua, D., & Lee, T. H. T. (2005). Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. Sprouse, & A. Lijestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 138–149). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inagaki, S. (2014). Syntax-semantics mappings as a source of difficulty in Japanese speakers’ acquisition of the mass-count distinction in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 464–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inagaki, S., & Barner, D. (2009). Countability in absence of count syntax: Evidence from Japanese quantity judgments. Studies in Language Sciences, 8, 111–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keating, G. D., & Jegerski, J. (2015). Experimental designs in sentence processing research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R. (2014). lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effects models. ELM, 1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, D., & Carroll, S. E. (2018). Second-language processing of English mass-count nouns by native-speakers of Korean. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 46, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakanishi, K. & Tomioka, S. (2004). Japanese plurals are exceptional. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 113–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nomoto, H. (2013). Number in classifier languages (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.
Ogawa, M. (2011). The dissociation of individuation and plural markers in L2 quantity judgment. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 17, 154–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), 343–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snape, N. (2008). Resetting the Nominal Mapping Parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 63–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. J., Bowen, D., & Martin, J. W. (1965). The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, W., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A. (2023). Examining transfer in the acquisition of the count/mass distinction in L2 English. Second Language Research, 39(1), 231–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umeda, M. (2016). L1 transfer of the mass-count distinction in Japanese-English interlanguage. Gunma Prefectural Women’s University Bulletin, 37, 93–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue