In:Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 88–110
Chapter 4Second language acquisition of English plurals by Chinese learners
Published online: 17 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.04liu
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.04liu
Abstract
Previous research supported the proposal that multiplicity inferences (i.e., the more than
one interpretation) associated with English plural morphology are scalar implicatures (Tieu et al., 2014). The current study extends the research to second language
(L2) acquisition by testing Chinese-speaking learners of English. Using a Truth Value Judgment Task (TVJT) adapted
from Tieu et al. (2014), we compared the interpretations of English bare
plurals among Chinese adult learners and native English speakers. Results indicate that the interpretive pattern of
Chinese learners closely aligns with that of the English controls’. This supports the universality of scalar
implicatures in L2 and does not provide direct evidence for L1 transfer through morpheme mapping from English plural
morpheme -s to Chinese plural morpheme -men.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Plurality, scalar implicature, and L1 transfer
- 2.1English bare plurals and the scalar implicature approach
- 2.2Adult L2 acquisition of scalar implicature
- 2.3Plurality in Chinese and L1 transfer through morpheme-to-morpheme mapping
- 2.3.1Men plurals
- 2.3.2Bare nouns
- 3.Research question and hypotheses
- 4.Experiment
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Task design and procedure
- 5.Results and discussion
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (42)
Alexiadou, A. (2011). Plural
mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, A. Sawyer, & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics (pp. 33–41). Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [URL]
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing
the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic
inference. Cognition, 118(1), 84–93.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting
Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare
and not so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic
Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. [URL].
Cho, J. (2021). Crosslinguistic
influence on L2 implicature computation for determiners. Journal of Second
Language
Studies, 5(1), 86–113.
(2022). Scalar
implicatures in adult L2 learners: A self-paced reading study. Second Language
Research, 40(2).
Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., et al. (2018). Pragmatic
abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches
to
Bilingualism, 9, 314–340.
Farkas, D., & de Swart, H. (2010). The
semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics &
Pragmatics, 3(6), 1–54.
Horn, L. (1972). On
the semantic properties of the logical operators in English (Doctoral
dissertation, UCLA. [URL]
Ivlieva, N. (2013). Scalar
implicatures and the grammar of plurality and disjunction (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Jiang, L. J. (2017). Mandarin
associative plural -men and NPs with -men. International Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 4(2), 191–256.
Kane, F., Tsoulas, G., Folli, R., Alexopoulou, T., & Romoli, J. (2015). A
scalar implicature-based account of the inference of pluralized mass (and count)
nouns. In Proceedings of
CLS 51 (pp. 317–331). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kim, K., & Melchin, P. B. (2018). On
the complementary distribution of plurals and classifiers in East Asian classifier
languages. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 12(4).
Krifka, M. (1995). Common
nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and
English. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The
generic
book (pp. 398–411). The University of Chicago Press.
Križ, M. (2017). Bare
plurals, multiplicity, and
homogeneity (Manuscript). Institut Jean
Nicod. Rtrieved on 15 May 2024 from [URL]
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some
thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language
acquisition. Second Language
Research, 25, 173–227. [URL].
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive
meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press.
Li, Y. H. A. (1999). Plurality
in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 8 (1), 75–99. [URL].
Li, Y. (2020). On
the semantics of suffix -men and NP-men in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Lexical
Semantics, 11831, 88–800. Springer.
Liu, Y. & Gil, K. H. (2022). The
interpretation of Chinese plurals: Experimental evidence by Chinese children and
adults. In Y. Gong & F. Kpogo (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 46th annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development (pp. 483–496). Cascadilla Press. [URL]
Mayr, C. (2015). Plural
definite NPs presuppose multiplicity via embedded
exhaustification. In Proceedings of Semantics and
Linguistic Theory
(SALT), 25, 204–224. LSA.
Mazzaggio, G., Panizza, D., & Surian, L. (2021). On
the interpretation of scalar implicatures in first and second language. Journal
of
Pragmatics, 171, 62–75.
Miller D, Giancaspro D, Iverson M, Rothman J, & Slabakova, R. (2016). Not
just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2
Spanish. In A. A. de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela, & C. Martinez Sanz (Eds.), Language
acquisition beyond parameters: Studies in honor of Juana M.
Liceras (pp. 125–145). John Benjamins.
Munn, A., Zhang, X., & Schmitt, C. (2009). Acquisition
of plurality in a language without
plurality. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarró, & J. Solà (Eds.), Merging
features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition. Oxford Academic.
Noveck, I. (2001). When
children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar
implicatures. Cognition, 78, 168–188.
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar
implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics
interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253–282.
Renans, A., Romoli, J., Makri, M., Tieu, L., de Vries, H., Folli, R., & Tsoulas, G. (2018). The
abundance inference of pluralised mass nouns is an implicature: Evidence from
Greek. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics, 1(3), 1–34.
Renans, A., Sağ, Y., Ketrez, F. N., Tieu, L., Tsoulas, G., Folli, R., de Vries, H., & Romoli, J. (2020). Plurality
and crosslinguistic variation: An experimental investigation of the Turkish
plural. Natural Language
Semantics, 28, 307–342.
Rullmann, H., & You, A. (2006). Chinese
general number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in
Mandarin. In H. Rullmann & A. You (Eds.), Where
semantics meets
pragmatics (pp. 175–196). Brill.
Sauerland, U. (2003). A
new semantics for number. In Proceedings of Semantics
and Linguistic
Theory (SALT) 13, (pp. 258–275). LSA.
Sauerland, U., Andersen, J., & Yatsushiro, K. (2005). The
plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic
evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational
perspectives (pp. 413–434). Mouton de Gruyter.
Slabakova, R. (2000). L1
transfer revisited: The L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native
speakers. Linguistics, 38(4), 739–770.
Snape, N., & Hosoi, H. (2018). Acquisition
of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of
English. Linguistic Approaches to
Bilingualism, 8(2), 163–192.
Spector, B. (2007). Aspects
of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order
implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition
and implicature in compositional
semantics (pp. 243–281). Palgrave Macmillan.
Tieu, L., Bill, C., Romoli, J., & Crain, S. (2014). Plurality
inferences are scalar implicatures: Evidence from acquisition. Semantics and
Linguistic Theory
(SALT), 24, 122–136. LSA.
Tsoulas, G. (2009). On
the grammar of number and mass terms in
Greek. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Greek Syntax
and
Semantics 57 (pp. 131–146). MITWPL.
