Cover not available

In:Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces: Selected proceedings of the 16th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference
Edited by Marta Velnić, Anne Dahl and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 10–36

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
What the acquisition of Japanese vs. Chinese contributes to generative approaches to SLA

Null subjects and long-distance anaphors revisited

 | Chuo University
Published online: 17 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.01hir
Abstract
This paper draws on data from previous findings on L2 Japanese and L2 Chinese. In particular, it investigates the role of Strong Uniformity (Miyagawa, 2009, 2017) in explaining an asymmetry in the L2 acquisition of Japanese and Chinese. The studies focus on three linguistic structures: person restrictions on null subjects, contrastive topics, and blocking on long-distance (LD) binding construal, all of which relate to the interface between syntax and discourse, an area known to cause difficulties for language learners (Sorace, 2011). It is suggested that the differences in L1 Chinese and L1 Japanese participant performance in L2 Japanese and Chinese, respectively, can be explained by differences in their ability to acquire new φ-features and inheritance in their respective target languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Typology based on Strong Uniformity (Miyagawa, 2017)
    • 2.2Restrictions on null subjects
    • 2.3LD reflexives and blocking
  • 3.Hypotheses for second language acquisition of Japanese and Chinese
  • 4.Study 1: Null subjects in L2 Japanese by Chinese, English, and Korean learners (Kizu, 2020; Kizu & Yamada, 2018)
  • 5.LD reflexives in L2 Japanese (Study 2, Umeda et al., 2017) and L2 Chinese (Study 3, Umeda et al., 2022)
    • 5.1Study 2: L2 Japanese by L1 Chinese learners (Umeda et al. 2017)
    • 5.2Study 3: L2 Chinese study (Umeda et al., 2022)
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Baker, M. (2008). The microparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 351–373). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz1 (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in language (pp. 1–52). The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clements, G. (1975). The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages, 10(2), 141–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, P., Hermon, G., & Sung, L.-M. (1990). Principle and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(1), 1–22. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasegawa, N. (2008). Licensing a null subject at CP: Imperatives, the 1st person, and PRO. Scientific approaches to language, No.7 (pp. 1–34). Center for Language Sciences, Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Agreement at the CP level: Clause types and the ‘person’ restrictions on the subject. In R. Shibagaki & R. Vermeulen (Eds.), The proceedings of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics 5 (pp. 131–152). The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–564. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J., Huang, Y.-H., Teng, T.-H., & Tiedeman, R. (1984). Reflexives in Chinese and the teaching of Chinese. Proceedings of the First World Conference on Chinese Language (pp. 205–215). World Chinese Language Association, Taipei.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iida, M. (1996). Context and binding in Japanese. SCLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jimenez-Fermandez, A. L. & Miyagawa, S. (2010). Discourse-agreement features, phrasal C and the edge: A minimalist approach. Diacritica-Ciencias da Linguagerm, 23, 23–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kano, A. & Nakayama, N. (2004). Knowledge of binding and the role of empathy in interpreting anaphora among adult second-language learners. Studies in Language Sciences, 6, 169–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katada, F. (1991). The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(2), 287–313. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (2005). Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In G. Cinque & R. Kayne (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 3–69). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kishida, M. (2011). Reflexives in Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.
Kiss, K. (1995). Introduction. In K. Kiss (Ed.), Discourse configurational languages (pp. 3–27). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kizu, M. (2013). L2 acquisition of null subjects in Japanese: A new generative perspective and its pedagogical implications. In M. Whong, G. Kook-Hee, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 35–55). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Nihongo no syusetsu gensyo ni kansuru daini gengo syutoku kenkyu [Main clause phenomena in L2 Japanese acquisition research]. In T. Shirahata & K. Suda (Eds.), Daini genngo syutokukenkyu no Hakyu kouka [Second language research and its application] (pp. 57–86). Kuroshio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kizu, M., & Yamada, K. (2018). Acquisition of person restriction on subjects in Japanese as a second language. J-SLA 2018, oral presentation (in Japanese). Gakushuin University, Tokyo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1972). Pronominalizations, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Linguistic Inquiry, 3(2), 161–95. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, S. & Kaburaki, E. (1977). Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), 625–672. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1973). On Kuno’s direct discourse analysis of the Japanese reflexive zibun. Papers in Japanese Linguistics, 2, 136–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, C-M. (2014). A modular theory of radical pro drop (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University.
Maki, H., Dunton, J., & Obringer, C. (2003). What grade would I be in if I were Japanese? Bulletin of the Faculty of Regional Studies, 12, 109–118. Gifu University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyagawa, S. (2005). On the EPP. In M. McGinnis & N. Richards (Eds.), Perspectives on phases (pp. 201–235). MITWPL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Agreement beyond phi. The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nawata, H., & Tsubokura, K. (2010). On the resetting of the subject parameter by Japanese learners of English: A survey of junior high school students. Second Language, 9, 63–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, T. (2014). Reflexive binding: Awareness and empathy from a syntactic point of view. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 23(2), 157–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oshima, D. Y. (2004). Zibun revisited: Empathy, logophoricity, and binding. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics, 23, 175–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oyaharcabal, B. (1993). Verb agreement with non arguments: On allocutive agreement. In J. I. Hualdem & J. O. de Urbina (Eds.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics (pp. 89–114). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, H. (2001). Why the blocking effect? In P. Cole, J. Huang, & G. Hermon (Eds.), Long-distance reflexives (pp. 279–316). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (1992). Relativized SUBJECT: Long distance reflexives without movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 23(4), 671–680. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Long-distance reflexives: Movement to Infl versus relativized SUBJECT. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(4), 755–772. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, M., & Tenny, C. (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In A. M. Di Sciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry in grammar (pp. 315–344). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, C. (1989). Chinese reflexives. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 7(1), 93–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenny, C. (2006). Evidentiality, experiencers, and the syntax of sentience in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15, 245–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1989). The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(3), 281–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umeda, M., Takeda, K., Hirakawa, M., Fukuda, M., Hirakawa, Y., Matthews, J., & Snape, N. (2017). Acquiring antecedents for reflexives when both L1 and L2 permit long-distance binding. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1(1), 38–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umeda, M., Hirakawa, M., Suzuki, K., Takeda, K., Fukuda, M., Matthews, J., and Snape, N. (2022). The blocking effect in the acquisition of Chinese reflexive ziji by L1-Japanese learners. The Japan Society for Language Sciences, The 23rd Annual International Conference, September 25, 2022.
van Urk, Koppe. (2015). A uniform syntax for phrasal movement: A case study of Dinka Bor (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Yang, C.-Y. B. (2014). Chinese null subjects: A view from the top. In C.-T. J. Huang & L. Feng-hsi (Eds.), Peaches and plums (pp. 227–253). Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshimura, N., Nakayama, M., Shirahata, T., Sawasaki, K., & Terao, Y. (2012). Zibun and locality in L2 Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 28, 89–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, B. (1998). Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research, 14, 324–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue