Cover not available

In:Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 243–264

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Interference-based and capacity-based approaches to working memory in second language sentence processing

 | University of Reading
Published online: 17 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.10cun
Abstract
The role that working memory may play in explaining potential differences between native and non-native sentence processing has been increasingly debated. In this chapter, I discuss how the conceptualisation of working memory is crucial to our understanding of its role in second language processing. In particular, I compare capacity-based approaches that focus on working memory resources and interference-based approaches that focus on memory encoding and retrieval. After reviewing evidence for both approaches to working memory, I argue that interference-based accounts provide a promising approach for examining the role of working memory in second language processing. Although I focus on non-native sentence processing, I also touch on related issues in second language acquisition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Working memory in L2 sentence processing
    • 2.1Capacity-based approaches to L2 sentence processing
    • 2.2Interference-based approaches to L2 sentence processing
  • 3.Characterising and measuring L2 individual differences
    • 3.1Memory capacity in L2 processing
    • 3.2Memory interference in L2 processing
    • 3.3Retrieval cues in processing and acquisition
    • 3.4Task performance and characterising individual differences
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (85)
References
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Working memory in second language learning. In W. Zhisheng, M. Morta, & A. McNeil (Eds). Working memory and second language acquisition and processing: Theories, research and commentaries (pp. 17–28). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(4), 657–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures (7th ed). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Miller, G. A. (1963). Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In R. Luce, R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 269–323). Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Some notes on the Shallow Structure Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 693–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contemori, C., Asiri, O., & Perea Irigoyen, E. D. (2019). Anaphora resolution in L2 English: An analysis of discourse complexity and cross-linguistic interference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 971–998. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(3), 615–646. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1158–1170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30(1), 73–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I. (2017a). Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 659–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Interference in native and non-native sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 712–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., Fotiadou, G., & Tsimpli, I. (2017). Anaphora resolution and reanalysis during L2 sentence processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 621–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Sturt, P. (2018). Retrieval interference and semantic interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 16–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dallas, A., DeDe, G., & Nicol, J. (2013). An event-related potential (ERP) investigation of filler-gap processing in native and second language speakers. Language Learning, 63(4), 766–799. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 85–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers. Second Language Research, 26(4), 443–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Working memory as executive attention: A revisit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 190–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 413–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C. (2016). Binding and coreference in non-native language processing. In A. Holler & K. Suckow (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on anaphora resolution. (pp. 229–253). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Structure-sensitive constraints in non-native sentence processing. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 3(1), 12–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2012). Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 571–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 453–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The on-line application of binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 485–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English – Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 187–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujita, H. (2019). Reanalysis processes in native and non-native language comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Reading.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmeister, P., Jaeger, T. F., Arnon, I., Sag, I. A., & Snider, N. (2013). The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1–2), 48–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmeister, P., & Sag, I. A. (2010). Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 86(2), 366–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 21(3), 250–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, 17, 5–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, G., & Felser, C. (2016). Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(5), 907–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäger, L. A., Mertzen, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Vasishth, S. (2020). Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104063. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2), 199–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21(2), 121–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review, 103(4), 773–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kan, I. P., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Drummey, A. B., Nutile, L., Krupa, L., & Novick, J. M. (2013). To adapt or not to adapt: The question of domain-general cognitive control. Cognition, 129(3), 637–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keating, G. D. (2010). The effects of linear distance and working memory on the processing of gender agreement in Spanish. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 53, 113–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Individual differences in language acquisition and processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 154–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lago, S., Shalom, D. E., Sigman, M., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2015). Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 133–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M., & Sunderman, G. (2016). Methodological implications of working memory tasks for L2 processing research. In G. Granena, D. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 89–104). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathy, F., Chekaf, M., & Cowan, N. (2018). Simple and complex working memory tasks allow similar benefits of information compression. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 381–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 111–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navon, D. (1984). Resources – A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(2), 186–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, H.-Y., & Felser, C. (2011). Referential context effects in L2 ambiguity resolution: Evidence from self-paced reading. Lingua, 121(2), 221–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, H.-Y., Schimke, S., & Felser, C. (2015). Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(3), 298–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, D., Shvartsman, M., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2017). The cue-based based retrieval theory of sentence comprehension: New findings and new challenges. In L. Escobar, V. Torrens, & T. Parodi (Eds.), Language processing and disorders (pp. 121–144). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: A visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 636–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 333–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 120(8), 2022–2039. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprouse, J., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C. (2012). A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language, 88(1), 82–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 542–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanner, D., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2012). Electrophysiological markers of interference and structural facilitation in native and nonnative agreement processing. In A. Biller, A. Chung, & A. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 294–606). Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Engle, R. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & Johns, C. L. (2012). Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension: Interference in comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(4), 193–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., Johns, C. L., & Kukona, A. (2014). Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition, 131(3), 373–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Engelmann, F., & Burchert, F. (2019). Computational models of retrieval processes in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(11), 968–982. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (2003). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 550–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.). (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witzel, J., Witzel, N., & Nicol, J. (2012). Deeper than shallow: Evidence for structure-based parsing biases in L2 sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 419–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodard, K., Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Taking your own path: Individual differences in executive function and language processing skills in child learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 187–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cunnings, Ian
2025. Group level and individual differences in second language sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue