Cover not available

In:Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 213–240

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Feature reconfiguration at the syntax-discourse interface

L2 acquisition of Italian CLLD

 | York University
Published online: 17 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.09sme
Abstract
This study examines L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition of feature mappings associated with Italian Clitic Left Dislocation (CLLD) by native speakers of English and Romanian. In Italian, insertion of a clitic after dislocating a direct object is restricted to [+anaphor] objects (López, 2009) and in Romanian to [+specific] objects. Extending the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere, 2009) to the syntax-discourse interface, successful acquisition is arguably more difficult for the L1 Romanian group than the L1 English group due to the need for feature reassembly. The findings show convergence with the target language only for the L1 English group in the near-native levels of L2 proficiency. The results suggest that reconfiguration is prone to fossilization when reassembly is required.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntax and properties of left dislocated objects
    • 2.1Object left dislocation constructions
    • 2.2The interpretative properties of CLLD in Italian and Romanian
    • 2.3Assignment of [+anaphor] and [+specific]
  • 3.Feature acquisition and feature reconfiguration
  • 4.Research question and feature reconfiguration
  • 5.The experiment
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Task 1: Acceptability judgments
      • 5.2.1Materials and procedure
      • 5.2.2Results and analysis
        • 5.2.2.1Italian and Romanian monolinguals
        • 5.2.2.2L1 Romanian, L2 Italian
        • 5.2.2.3L1 English, L2 Italian
    • 5.3Task 2: Written elicitation
      • 5.3.1Materials and procedure
      • 5.3.2Results and analysis
        • 5.3.2.1Italian and Romanian monolinguals
        • 5.3.2.2L1 Romanian, L2 Italian
        • 5.3.2.3L1 English, L2 Italian
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Avram, L., & Martine C. (1999). Null objects and accusative clitics in Romanian. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics IV (1), 88–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D., Roger, L., Scheepers, C., & Tilly, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, V., Bocci, G., & Cruschina, S. (2013). Focus fronting and its implicatures. In E. O. Aboh, J. Schaeffer, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2013: Selected papers from Going Romance, Amsterdam 2013. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohnacker, U., & Rosen, C. (2008). The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives: Transfer of information structure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 511–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models  – Estimation with the r-package ordinal. Retrieved on 1 March 2022 from [URL]
Cornilescu, A., & Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (2008). Clitic doubling, complex heads and interarboreal operations. In L. Tasmowski & D. Kallulli (Eds.), Clitic doubling in the balkan languages (pp. 289–319). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1990). Clitic doubling, Wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(3), 351–398.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donaldson, B. (2011). Left-dislocation in near-native French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 399–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, W. (2006). Contrast and movement to the German prefield. In V. M. S. Winkler (Ed.), Architecture of Focus. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 251–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22(3), 369–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 463–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivanov, I. (2009). Second language acquisition of Bulgarian object clitics: A test case for the interface hypothesis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa.
(2012). L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic-doubling: A test case for the interface hypothesis. Second Language Research, 28, 345–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, K. E. (1998). Identical focus versus information focus. Language, 74, 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laleko, O., & Polinsky, M. (2016). Between syntax and discourse. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(4), 396–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In H. Zobl, J. M. Liceras, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leal, T., & Slabakova, R. (2019). The relationship between L2 instruction, exposure and the acquisition of a syntax-discourse property in L2 Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 237–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonetics and phonology of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. P. (2015). The L3 syntax-discourse interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 206–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Testing the current models of third language acquisition. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer models, new developments and implications (pp. 63–84). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Ivanov, I. (2011). A more careful look at the syntax-discourse interface. Lingua, 121, 637–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J. (2012). Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smeets, L. (2018). The acquisition of object movement in Dutch: L1 transfer and ultimate attainment at the syntax-discourse interface. Second Language Research, 35(4), 479–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Conditions on L1 transfer in L2 discourse-syntax mappings: The case of Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Romanian (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 195–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Sorace, A. (2006). Differentiating Interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. BUCLD Proceedings, 30, 653–664.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, E. (2005). L2 ultimate attainment and the syntax-discourse interface: the acquisition of topic constructions in non-native Spanish and English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Smeets, Liz
2024. L1 grammatical attrition through the acquisition of competing L2 discourse features. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Smeets, Liz
2024. Feature reassembly and L1 preemption: Acquiring CLLD in L2 Italian and L2 Romanian. Second Language Research 40:3 ► pp. 559 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue