In:Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 117–136
Feature dependency and the poverty of the stimulus in the acquisition of L2 German plural allomorphy
Published online: 17 August 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.05arc
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.05arc
Abstract
In this study, I investigated the acquisition of L2 German
plural allomorphy via a written production task of classroom
learners in North America. Trommer (2015) has argued that the mutual exclusivity of
marking plural by either an [n] suffix or an umlauted (i.e.
[CORONAL]) stem vowel derives from a universal property of
phonological representations. The crossing of association lines,
which would result from doubly linking the [CORONAL] feature (which
marks the plural), is banned. The data show that the learners made
many errors, but that the number of forms which suggested a
violation of this universal property were statistically
insignificant. I argue that these data are consistent with models
showing that interlanguage phonologies are governed by universal
phonological principles.
Keywords: L2 phonology, allomorphy, universal grammar, feature geometry, interfaces
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interfaces in SLA
- 3.Multiple exponence versus allomorphy
- 3.1Feature geometry
- 4.SLA and allomorphy
- 4.1Methodology
- 4.1.1Test items T1
- 4.1.2Test Items T2: The test items at time 2 are given in Table 4
- 4.1.3Data analysis
- 4.1.4The task
- 4.1.5Phonology, silent reading, and lexical activation
- 4.1.6Bilingual lexicon and non-selective access
- 4.1Methodology
- 5.Results
- 5.1Errors X word type: T1
- 5.2Errors X word type: T2
- 5.3No impossible Turkish grammars
- 5.3.1Secondary feature spreading
- 5.3.2No crossing constraint
- 5.4No impossible German grammars
- 5.5Poverty of the stimulus
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (44)
Archibald, J. (2016). Phonology
at the interface: Late insertion and spell out in L2
morphophonology. Paper
presented at News Sounds
2016, Aarhus, Denmark.
Archibald, J., & Croteau, N. (2021). Acquisition
of L2 Japanese WH questions: Evidence of phonological
contiguity and non-shallow
structures. Second Language
Research, 37(4), 649–679.
Avery, P., & Rice, K. (1989). Segment
structure and coronal
underspecification. Phonology, 6, 179–200.
Bader, M. (1998). Prosodic
influences on reading syntactically ambiguous
sentences. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis
in sentence
processing (pp. 1–46). Kluwer.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The
logical problem of foreign language
learning. Linguistic
Analysis, 20, 3–49.
(2009). The
evolving context of the Fundamental Difference
Hypothesis. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 321, 175–198.
Bonet, E., & Harbour, D. (2012). Contextual
allomorphy. In J. Trommer (Ed.), Morphology
and phonology of
exponence (pp. 195–235). Oxford University Press.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2017). Some
notes on the shallow structure
hypothesis. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The
significance of learners’
errors. International Review
of Applied
Linguistics, 5, 160–170.
Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition
of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role
of phonology. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 41, 496–518.
Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic
disambiguation in silent
reading. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings
of the North East Linguistic
Society, 32
(pp. 112–132). GSLA.
Franceschina, F. (2001). Morphological
or syntactic deficits in near – native speakers? An
assessment of some current
proposals. Second Language
Research, 17(3), 213–247.
Goad, H., & White, L. (2019). Prosodic
effects on L2
grammars. Linguistic
Approaches to
Bilingualism, 9, 769–808.
(2009). Ultimate
attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic
approach. Second Language
Research, 22, 243–268.
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental
phonology (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). MIT.
Hall, D. C. (2017). Contrastive
specification in
phonology. In M. Aronoff (Ed.) Oxford
research encyclopedia in
linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Hammond, M. (1988). On
deriving the well – formedness
condition. Linguistic
Inquiry, 19(2), 319–325.
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y-H. (1997) The
partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language
acquisition: The ‘Failed Functional Features
Hypothesis.’ Second Language
Research, 13, 187–226.
Itô, J., Mester, A., & Padgett, J. (1995). Licensing
and underspecification in Optimality
Theory. Linguistic
Inquiry, 26(4), 571–613.
Mackenzie, S. (2011) Contrast
and the evaluation of similarity: Evidence from consonant
harmony. Lingua, 121, 1401–1423.
McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. (1982). The
visual tongue – twister effect: Phonological activation in
silent reading. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 21, 672–687.
McGuian, F.J. and Dollins, A.B. 1989. Patterns of covert speech behavior and phonetic coding. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 24, 19-26.
Nakayama, M. & J. Archibald (2005). Eyetracking and interlingual homographs. Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
Özçelik, Ö., & Sprouse, R. (2016). Emergent
knowledge of a universal phonological principle in the L2
acquisition of vowel harmony in Turkish: A ‘four’ – fold
poverty of the stimulus in L2
acquisition. Second Language
Research, 33(2), 179–206.
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B., & Clahsen, H. (2004). On
the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German
nominals. Linguistics, 42(3), 669–705.
Rice, K. (1994). Peripheral in Consonants. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique, 39(3), 191-216.
Rice K. (1996). Default variability: The coronal-velar relationship Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 14: 493-543.
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2
cognitive states and the full transfer/full access
model. Second Language
Research, 12, 40–72.
Schwartz, M., & Goad, H. (2016). Indirect
positive evidence in the acquisition of a subset
grammar. Language
Acquisition, 24(3), 234–264.
Sorace, A. (2012). Pinning
down the concept of interface in bilingual
development. Linguistic
Approaches to
Bilingualism, 2(2), 209–216.
Stefanich, S., Cabrelli, J., Hilderman, D., & Archibald, J. (2019). The
morphophonology of intraword codeswitching: Representation
and processing. Frontiers in
Communication: Language
Sciences, 4, 54.
Trommer, J. (2015). Moraic
affixes and morphological colors in
Dinka. Linguistic
Inquiry, 46(1), 77–112.
(2018). The
subsegmental structure of German plural
allomorphy. Talk given at
the University of
Victoria.
Wunderlich, D. (1999). German
noun plural
reconsidered. Behavioral and
Brain
Sciences 22(6), 1044–1045.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Özçelik, Öner
Schuhmann, Katharina S. & Laura Catharine Smith
Archibald, John
2023. Phonological parsing via an integrated I-language. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13:6 ► pp. 743 ff.
Archibald, John
2024. “And yet it moves”. In Current Perspectives on Generative SLA – Processing, Influence, and Interfaces [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 70], ► pp. 264 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
