Cover not available

In:Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, interfaces, and beyond
Edited by Tania Leal, Elena Shimanskaya and Casilde A. Isabelli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67] 2022
► pp. 93–114

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

L1-Mandarin L2-English learners’ acquisition of English double-quantifier scope

 | National Chung Cheng University
 | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Published online: 17 August 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.67.04wu
Abstract
English double-quantifier configurations such as A dog scared every man are ambiguous between a surface-scope reading (there exists one specific dog which scared every man) and an inverse-scope reading (each man was scared by a possibly different dog), while the Mandarin equivalent only has the surface-scope reading. Therefore, if L1-transfer is at work, L1-Mandarin L2-English learners would not initially allow inverse-scope readings in English, but may acquire them through exposure to relevant input. We tested learners in the U.S. and native English speakers on their acceptance of surface-scope and inverse-scope readings and found that learners disallowed inverse-scope readings of English double-quantifier sentences. This suggests that positive evidence alone is not sufficient for the L2-acquisition of inverse scope.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Scope in English, Mandarin and L2-acquisition
    • 2.1English and Mandarin scope
    • 2.2Experimental studies on English and Mandarin scope
      • 2.2.1Experiments on English scope
      • 2.2.2Experiments on Mandarin scope
    • 2.2Previous L2 and heritage language studies on scope
  • 3.Scope in L2-English: The role of positive evidence
    • 3.1Positive evidence and L2-acquisition
    • 3.2Research question
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Task materials
    • 4.2Procedure
    • 4.3Participants
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Descriptive results
    • 5.2Statistical analysis
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Anderson, C. (2004). The structure and real-time comprehension of quantifier scope ambiguity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
Aoun, J., & Li, Y.-H. (1989). Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 141–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Syntax of scope. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. (2018). Ordinal – Regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2018. 8–25. Retrieved on 24 Febrary 2022 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chu, C.-Y., Gabriele, A., & Minai, U. (2014). Acquisition of quantifier scope interpretation by Chinese-speaking learners of English. In C.-Y. Chu, C. E. Coughlin, B. Lopez Prego, U. Minai, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2012) (157–168). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, D. J. (1998). Economy and semantic interpretation – A study of scope and variable binding (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernández, T. A. (2011). Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 159–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
(1983). On the representation of scope in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 11(1), 36–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, S.-F. (1981). On the scope phenomena of Chinese quantifiers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 9, 226–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inagaki, S. (2002). Japanese learners’ acquisition of English manner-of-motion verbs with location/directional PPs. Second Language Research, 18(1), 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., & Luchkina, T. (2019). Scope, syntax, and prosody in Russian as a second or heritage language. In M. Cabrera & J. Camacho (Eds.), Exploring interfaces (pp. 141–170). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language Learning, 60(4), 877–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition, 48, 243–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2018). Package “emmeans”. R package version 1.3.3. Retrieved on 24 February 2022 from [URL]
Marsden, H. (2009). Distributive quantifier scope in English-Japanese and Korean-Japanese interlanguage. Language Acquisition, 16(3), 135–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, R. (1977). The grammar of quantification grammar (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
(1985). Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2001). Agentive verbs of manner of motion in Spanish and English as second languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 171–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Polinsky M., Tsai, C.-Y., & Mai, K. (2017). Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity: When two systems meet. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Tsai, C.-Y., Mai, K., & Polinsky, M. (2014). Chinese scope: An experimental investigation. In U. Etxeberria, A. Fălăuş, A. Irurtzun, & B. Leferman (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18 (pp. 396–414). Retrieved on 24 February 2022 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trahey, M. (1996). Positive evidence in second language acquisition: Some long-term effects. Second Language Research, 12(2), 111–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tunstall, S. L. (1998). The interpretation of quantifiers: Semantics & processing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
White, L. (1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. French Language Studies, 1, 189–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, M.-J., & Ionin, T. (2019). L1-Mandarin L2-English speakers’ acquisition of English quantifier-negation scope. In M. Brown & B. Dailey B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 716–729). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, M.-J. (2021). Acquisition of Inverse Scope by L1-Mandarin L2-English Learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kimura, Takayuki
2025. Revisiting Universal Grammar in L2 acquisition: Weak conformity and linguistic dissonance resolution. Second Language Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue