Cover not available

In:The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 53–84

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Derivational patterns in spontaneous data of French-speaking parent-child interactions before age three

 | University of Lausanne
 | University of Lausanne
Published online: 10 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.66.03kil
Abstract
This chapter is a first step towards the characterisation of the morphological structure of the French lexicon in early first language acquisition, i.e. before children coin novel word formations. Focusing on nouns and verbs, it analyses the variety of derivational means used by toddlers and caregivers in two corpora of French-speaking children (1;4/1;6–2;11). A comparison is done with a sample of adult-directed (ADS) speech. Findings on derivation are compared with previous observations on compounds in the same data. The results display the development of tight-knit morphological relationships within the lexicon and a clear prevalence of suffixation over other derivational means and compounding. Along with errors in affixed words, these relationships provide cues of early detection of derivational morphology in child speech.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French derivational morphology in the target system
    • 2.1Noun formation
    • 2.2Verb formation
    • 2.3Adjective formation
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Suffixation
      • 4.1.1Nominal suffixes
      • 4.1.2Adjectival suffixes
      • 4.1.3Errors
      • 4.1.4Development of semantic categories
    • 4.2Prefixation
    • 4.3Conversion
      • 4.3.1N-V pairs
        • 4.3.1.1Homophonous N-V pairs
        • 4.3.1.2N-V pairs with modification
      • 4.3.2Verbs derived from adjectives
      • 4.3.3Adjectives converted from verbs (PP, PPres, sg. pres. ind.)/deverbal adjectives
    • 4.4ADS
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. 2015. A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (eds), 478–510. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amiot, D. 2004. Préfixes ou prépositions? Le cas de sur(-), sans(-), contre(-) et les autres. Lexique 16: 67–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D. 2002. La construction du lexique français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. La préfixation en RE-, l’antonymie directionnelle et les phénomènes de polarité sémantique. French Language Studies 17: 143–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. & Galmiche, M. (eds) 1986. La grammaire d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M. 2011. Word formation in Romance. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. I, M. Maiden, J. C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 532–563. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. & Plag, I. 2013. The analysis and limits of conversion. In The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, L. Bauer, R. Lieber & I. Plag, 545–567. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Béchade, H.-D. 1992. Phonétique et morphologie du français contemporain. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, L. 1970. Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Boyé, G. 2005. Construire le paradigme d’un adjectif. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 77–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, O., Boyé, G. & Kerleroux, F. 2009. L’allomorphie radicale et la relation flexion–construction. In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 103–126. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. 2012. The Grammar of Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. 1985. The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol.1, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 687–782. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Lexical creativity in French-speaking children. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 17: 513–530.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbin, D. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dal, G. 1997. Grammaire du suffixe -et(te). Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferret, K. & Villoing, F. 2015. French N-age instrumentals: Semantic properties of the base verb. Morphology 25(4): 473–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fradin, B. 2003. Nouvelles approches en morphologie. Paris: PUF. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Compounding in French. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 417–435. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fradin, B., Hathout, N. & Meunier, F. 2003. La suffixation en -ET et la question de la productivité. Langue Française 140: 56–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, L. 2015. Lexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Semantics of Complex Words, L. Bauer, L. Körtvélyessy & P. Štekauer (eds), 115–141. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabar, N., Tribout, D., Dal, G., Fradin, B., Hathout, N., Lignon, S., Namer, F., Plancq, C., Yvon, F. & Zweigenbaum, P. 2006. Production quantitative des suffixations par -ité et -Able dans un corpus journalistique moderne. TALN 2006: 167–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guilbert, L. 1975. La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huot, H. 2001. Morphologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerleroux, F. 1996. La coupure invisible. Études de syntaxe et de morphologie. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. 2017. Early development of compounds in two French children’s corpora. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61], W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 91–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Xanthos, A. 2013. The adjective petit ‘small, little’ in French acquisition data: An example of the relationship between pragmatics and morphosyntactic development. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 113–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koehl, A. 2012. La construction morphologique des noms désadjectivaux suffixés en français. PhD dissertation. Université de Lorraine.
Le Grand Robert de la langue française. 2018. <[URL]> (2 May 2021).
Lehmann, A. & Martin-Berthet, F. 1998. Introduction à la lexicologie. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Robert brio. 2012. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lippeveld, M. & Oshima-Takane, Y. 2015a. Nouns to verbs to and verbs to nouns: When do children acquire class extension rules for deverbal nouns and denominal verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 36(3): 559–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. The effect of input on children’s cross-categorical use of polysemous noun-verb pairs. Language Acquisition 22: 209–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manova, S. 2011. Understanding Morphological Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marascuilo, L. A. & McSweeney, M. 1967. Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychological Bulletin 67(6): 401–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I. 1996. Cours de morphologie générale, Vol. III. Montréal: CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Namer, F. & Villoing, F. 2008. Interpréter les noms déverbaux: Quelle relation avec la structure argumentale du verbe de base? Le cas des noms en -oir(e) du français. In Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1551–1569. Paris: EDP Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plénat, M. 2008. Le thème L de l’adjectif et du nom. In Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2008, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1613–1626. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roché, M. 2009. Un ou deux suffixes? Une ou deux suffixations? In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 143–174. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U. (eds) 2007. The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trésor de la langue française informatisé (TLFi). <[URL]> (30 April 2021).
Tribout, D. 2010. Les conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en français. PhD dissertation. Université Paris Diderot.
Tribushinina, E., van den Bergh, H., Kilani-Schoch, M., Aksu-Koç, A., Dabašinskienė, I., Hrzica, G., Korecky-Kröll, K., Noccetti, S. & Dressler, W. U. 2013. The role of explicit contrast in adjective acquisition: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study of adjective production in spontaneous child speech and parental input. First Language 33(6): 594–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. & Noccetti, S. (eds) 2015. Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. 2017. Noun and verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In Polycategoriality and Lexical Categories: Cross-linguistic, Cross-theoretical and Language Acquisition Approaches [Studies in Language Companion Series 182], V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (eds), 381–411. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villoing, F. 2012. French compounds. Probus 2: 29–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Forshaw, William
2022. Book Review: Veronica Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler (Eds.), The acquisition of derivational morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective. First Language 42:5 ► pp. 696 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue