In:Typical and Impaired Processing in Morphosyntax
Edited by Vincent Torrens
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 64] 2020
► pp. 137–152
A good-enough representation is not good enough
Published online: 21 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.64.07kor
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.64.07kor
It has been proposed that language processing invokes extra-grammatical heuristics in addition to, or instead of the computational system (e.g., Townsend & Bever, 2001; Karimi & Ferreira, 2016). The outputs of these extra-grammatical heuristics are called “good-enough” representations. These representations lack (syntactic) detail and are incomplete (Karimi & Ferreira, 2016). This paper evaluates this claim by investigating one extra-grammatical processing heuristic in particular: the NV(N)-strategy. Two experiments prove that (i) interpretations that would result from application of the NV(N)-strategy are sometimes difficult to generate and (ii) listeners compute (syntactic) representations for sentences that are more detailed than the NV(N)-strategy would predict. This gives rise to the question whether “good-enough” representations are computed at all.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Processing heuristics
- 3.Another case in which the NV(N)-strategy fails
- 3.1Experiment 1
- 4.The meaning representations of ungrammatical sentences
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (26)
Agnew, Z. K., van de Koot, H., McGettigan, C., & Scott, S. K. (2014). Do sentences with unaccusative verbs involve syntactic movement? Evidence from neuroimaging. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(9), 1035–1045.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In R. Hayes (ed.) Cognition and the development of language development (pp. 279–362). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
Bever, T. G., & Sanz, M. (1997). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension: Unaccusatives in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 69–91.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.
Deal, A. R. (2007). The asymmetry of argument structure: Evidence from coercion.
Semantics and Processing (UMOP 37).
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The “Good Enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1, 71–83.
Friedmann, N. (2007). Young children and A-chains: The acquisition of Hebrew Unaccusatives. Language Acquisition, 14, 377–422.
Friedmann, N., Taranto, G., Shapiro, L. P., & Swinney, D. (2008). The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 355–377.
Hackl, M. (1998).
On the semantics of ability attributions
(Unpublished manuscript). MIT.
Hoekstra, T. (1984).
Transitivity: Grammatical relations in government- binding theory
(Unpublished dissertation). Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
van Hout, A. (2004). Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 60–83). Oxford: OUP.
Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal Experimental Psychology, 69(5).
Koornneef, A., & Reuland, E. (2016). On the shallow processing (dis)advantage: Grammar and economy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(82).
Koring, L., Mak, P., & Reuland, E. (2012). The time course of argument reactivation revealed: Using the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 123, 361–379.
Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(3), 217–228.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In J. J. Jaeger, A. C. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O. D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E. E. Sweetser, H. Thompson, & K. W. Whistler (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 157–189). Berkeley CA: BLS.
Perlmutter, D., & Postal, P. (1984). The 1-advancement exclusiveness law. Studies in Relational Grammar, 2, 81–125.
Reinhart, T. (2000). The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
(2016). The Theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. In M. Everaert, M. Marelj, E. Reuland, & T. Siloni (Eds.), Concepts, syntax, and their interface: The theta system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Shetreet, E., & Friedmann, N. (2012). Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage, 60(3), 1800–1806.