In:Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edited by Tania Ionin and Matthew Rispoli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 63] 2019
► pp. 125–142
When OR is conjunctive in child Mandarin
Published online: 15 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.07hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.07hua
According to a recent proposal, children license a conjunctive inference for statements with disjunction even without a licensing expression that adults require, e.g., the deontic modal verb is allowed to (Singh, Wexler, Astle, Kamawar, & Fox, 2016; Tieu et al., 2017). However, the rates of children’s conjunctive inferences vary considerably across studies, which may be due to the different experimental tasks and materials. Using a Truth Value Judgment Task (Crain & Thornton, 1998), the present study systematically investigated children’s interpretation of disjunctive sentences with and without a deontic modal verb. It was found that children computed conjunctive inferences only in sentences with the deontic modal verb. We discuss the possible reasons for the varying findings of children’s interpretation of disjunction in previous studies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Children’s conjunctive interpretation of disjunction
- 2.2Children’s interpretation of disjunction
- 2.3Children’s computation of free choice inferences
- 3.Experiments
- 3.1Experiment 1
- 3.2Experiment 2
- 4.Discussion and conclusion
Acknowledgements References
References (38)
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2006). Disjunction in alternative semantics (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2013). Grammatical alternatives and pragmatic development. In A. Falaus (Ed.), Alternatives in semantics (pp.238–266). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition 118(1), 84–93.
Boster, C. T., & Crain, S. (1993). On children’s understanding of every and or. In C. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of Early Cognition and the Transition to Language (pp.1–23). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Chemla, E. (2009). Similarity: Towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection. Manuscript.
(2017). Scalar implicature and their interface with grammar. The Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 245–264.
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In A. Do, L. Domínguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Chierchia, G., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., Meroni, L., Crain, S., & Foppolo, F. (2004). Semantic and pragmatic competence in children’s and adults’ comprehension of or. In I. A. Noveck, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp.283–300). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., & Thornton, R. (1998).
Some and or: A study on the emergence of logical form. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, & H. Walsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Crain, S., Gardner, A., Gualmini, A., & Rabbin, B. (2002). Children’s command of negation. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp.71–95). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2002). Why language acquisition is a snap. The Linguistic Review, 19(1–2), 163–184.
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp.71–120). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Franke, M. (2011). Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation. Semantics and Pragmatics, 4, 1–82.
Goro, T., & Akiba, S. (2004). The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp.101–114). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Goro, T., Minai, U., & Crain, S. (2005). Two disjunctions for the price of only one. In A. Brugos, M. Clark-Cotton, & H. Seungwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.228–239). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Gualmini, A., Crain, S., Meroni, L., Chierchia, G., & Guasti, M. T. (2001). At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child language. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolenszky (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT XI (pp.231–247). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jing, C.-Y., Crain, S., & Hsu, C.-F. (2005). The interpretation of focus in Chinese: Child versus adult language. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp.165–190). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Kiguchi, H., & Thornton, R. (2016). Connectivity effects in pseudoclefts in child language. Studia Linguistica, 70(1), 34–65.
Klinedinst, N. (2007). Plurality and possibility (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California.
Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp.1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Morris, B. J. (2008). Logically speaking: Evidence for item-based acquisition of the connectives AND and OR. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(1), 67–88.
Notley, A., Zhou, P., Jensen, B., & Crain, S. (2012). Children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of ‘before’: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 482–522.
Papafragou, A., & Skordos, D. (2016). Scalar implicature. In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp.611–632). Oxford: OUP.
Schulz, K. (2005). A pragmatic solution for the paradox of free choice permission. Synthese, 147(2), 343–377.
Singh, R., Wexler, K., Astle, A., Kamawar, D., & Fox, D. (2016). Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: Consequences for theories of implicature and child development. Natural Language Semantics, 24(4), 305–352.
Spector, B. (2007). Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In U. Sauerland, & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp.243–281). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Su, Y. (2015). The acquisition of logical connectives in child Mandarin. Language Acquisition, 21, 119–155.
Su, Y., & Crain, S. (2013). Children’s knowledge of disjunction and universal quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 14(3), 599–631.
Tieu, L., Romoli, J., Zhou, P., & Crain, S. (2016). Children’s knowledge of free choice inferences and scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 33, 269–298.
Tieu, L., Yatsuhiro, K., Cremers, A., Romoli, J., Sauerland, U., & Chemla, E. (2017). On the role of alternatives in the acquisition of simple and complex disjunctions in French and Japanese. Journal of Semantics, 34, 127–152.
van Rooij, R. (2010). Conjunctive interpretation of disjunction. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3(11), 1–28.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.