In:Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edited by Tania Ionin and Matthew Rispoli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 63] 2019
► pp. 1–4
Three streams of generative language acquisition research
Introduction
Published online: 15 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.01ion
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.01ion
References (16)
Clahsen, H. (Ed.). (1994). Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons (Language Acquistion and Language Disorders 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Connor, M., Fisher, C., & Roth, D. (2013). Starting from scratch in semantic role labeling: Early indirect supervision. In A. Villavicencio, T. Poibeau, A. Korhonen, & A. Alishahi (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of computational language acquisition: Theory and applications of natural language processing. Berlin: Springer.
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597–650.
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (2008). Language acquisition. Essay for cognitive science in the classroom. Retrieved from <[URL]>.
de Villiers, J. G., & Roeper, T. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hadley, P., Rispoli, M., Fitzgerald, C., & Bahnsen, A. (2011). Predictors of morphosyntactic growth in typically developing toddlers: Contributions of parent input and child sex. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 54, 549–566.
Legate, J., & Yang, C. (2007). Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition, 14(3), 315–344.
Miller, K. (2012). Not all children agree: Acquisition of agreement when the input is variable. Language Learning and Development, 8, 255–277.
Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 110–114. doi:
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2000). When syntactic theories evolve: Consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156–186). Oxford: Blackwell.
(2013). Generative approaches and the poverty of the stimulus. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.137–158). Cambridge: CUP.