Cover not available

In:On the Acquisition of the Syntax of Romance:
Edited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 169–184

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The comprehension of Italian negation in Mandarin-Italian sequential bilingual children

 | Xiamen University
 | University of Verona
 | University of Verona | Utrecht University
 | University of Verona
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.62.08hu
This study investigates how sequential bilingual Mandarin-speaking children who had more than three years of exposure to Italian comprehended Italian negative sentences in comparison with affirmative ones. Sixteen bilingual children and 16 Italian monolingual peers were tested using a truth-value judgment task. All children showed greater difficulties in the comprehension of True negatives, indicating that the difficulties in the processing of negation, in the relevant experimental conditions, have a general validity across the two groups. This result can be readily interpreted in the light of the “experiential” theories of negation processing, by means of the two-step simulation hypothesis. In addition, it should be emphasized that bilingual children were more accurate in the comprehension of True negatives than monolingual children, a finding that deserves further investigation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • Previous studies on children’s acquisition of negation
    • The two-step simulation hypothesis
  • 2.Method
    • Participants
    • Materials and procedure
    • Data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • The analysis of response accuracy
    • The analysis of response latency
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (43)
References
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barac, R., Moreno, S., & Bialystok, E. (2016). Behavioral and electrophysiological differences in executive control between monolingual and bilingual children. Child Development, 87(4), 1277–1290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Peets, K. F., & Moreno, S. (2014). Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 177-191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Language development from two to three. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Guasti, M. T. (1993). Negation in epistemic small clauses. Probus, 5, 39–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82, 45–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, H. Q. (1925). Eetong xinli zhi yanjiu [Research on child psychology]. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, H. (2014). The answering system to yes–no truth-functional questions in Korean–English bilingual children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 267–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ćoso, B., & Bogunović, I. (2017). The role of linguistic cues in bilingual negation processing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delfitto D. (2018). Negation as a window on the non-sequential nature of language interpretation and processing. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza, & F. Lo Piparo (Eds.), Further advances in pragmatics and philosophy (pp.81–95). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernst, T. (1995). Negation in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 13(4), 665–707.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fan, L. (2007). Early child language acquisition of negative words in Mandarin Chinese. Modern Foreign Languages (Quarterly), 30(2), 144–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Science, 20, 1–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. NeuroImage, 15(3), 647–660.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasson, U., & Glucksberg, S. (2006). Does understanding negation entail affirmation? An examination of negated metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1015–1032.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, S., Vender, M., Fiorin, G., & Delfitto, D. (2018). Difficulties in comprehending affirmative and negative Sentences: Evidence from Chinese children with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(2), 181–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Effects of negation, truth value, and delay on picture recognition after reading affirmative and negative sentences. In B. G. Bara, & L. Barsal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1114–1119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1033–1050.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negation represented? In F. Schmalhofer, & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp.255–288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Madrid, D., & Garcia, E. E. (1981). Development of negation in bilingual Spanish/English and monolingual English speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 624–631.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle: An event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1213–1218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nordmeyer, A. E., & Frank, M. C. (2014). The role of context in young children’s comprehension of negation. Journal of Memory and Language, 77, 25–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paap, K. P., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Should the search for bilingual advantages in executive functioning continue? Cortex, 74, 305–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early child language. In D. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp.156–186). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scappini, M. (2015). On the processing of sentential negation in dyslexic adults: An ERP study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Verona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2012). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stella, G., Pizzioli, C., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2000). Peabody - Test di Vocabolario Recettivo. Torino: Omega Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(1), 3–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vender, M., & Delfitto, D. (2010). Towards a pragmatic of negation: The interpretation of negative sentences in developmental dyslexia. Generative Grammar at Geneva, 6, 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vender, M. (2017). Disentangling dyslexia: Phonological and processing impairment in developmental dyslexia. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vender, M., Hu, S., Mantione, F., Savazzi, S., Delfitto, D., & Melloni, C. (2018). Inflectional morphology: Evidence for an advantage of bilingualism in dyslexia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1959). The processing of positive and negative information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(2), 92–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1961). Response to affirmative and negative binary statements. British Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 133–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(1), 7–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue