Cover not available

In:On the Acquisition of the Syntax of Romance:
Edited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 7–30

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

French experiencer verbs and the Universal Freezing Hypothesis

 | McGill University
 | University of Connecticut
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.62.02bor
The Universal Freezing Hypothesis (UFH) of Snyder and Hyams (2015) predicts that the developmental time course of English be-passives follows from younger children’s inability to make exceptions to the Freezing Principle, required for smuggling derivations, where mature speakers can. Recent research (Belletti & Rizzi, 2012) indicates that Object-Experiencer (OE) verbs, but not Subject-Experiencer (SE) verbs, require smuggling. We use French to test the resulting prediction of the UFH: mastery of French OE verbs should be late, after age 4, but SE verbs are mastered much earlier. Analysis of longitudinal spontaneous-speech data from 11 children acquiring French indicates that OE verbs are infrequent in children’s speech prior to age 4, while SE verbs are present earlier, usually by age 2.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prior research
    • 2.1The Universal Freezing Hypothesis and the acquisition of be-passives
    • 2.2The UFH and the acquisition of get-passives
    • 2.3Guasti’s conjecture for Romance causatives
    • 2.4Acquisition of French causatives
    • 2.5Romance causatives and the UFH
    • 2.6The locus of maturational change
  • 3.Experiencer verbs and smuggling
    • 3.1The UFH and the acquisition of French experiencer verbs
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
References (59)
References
Alexiadou, A. (2012). Noncanonical passives revisited: Parameters of nonactive Voice. Linguistics, 50, 1079–1110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 73–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (2016a). Labeling (Romance) causatives. Manuscript, Université de Genève.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). On the acquisition of complex derivations, with related considerations on poverty of the stimulus and frequency. Manuscript, Université de Genève.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In L. Brugè, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, & C. Poletto (Eds.), Cartography of syntactic structures 7 (pp. 129–137). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellucci, G. (2015). Acquiring Romance causatives: Evidence from child Italian. Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali, 1, 89–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bencini, G., & Valian, V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 97–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. (1998) A minimalist view on the passive. University of Connecticut Papers in Linguistics Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borga, J., & Snyder, W. (2018). Acquisition of French causatives: Parallels to English passives. Languages, 3, 18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheung, C. C., & Larson, R. K. (2015). Psych verbs in English and Mandarin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33, 127–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, C. (2005a). A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8, 81–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 289–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, N. (2006). Freezing effects. In M. Everaert, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax: Volume I (pp. 383–406). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1993). Competence and performance in child language. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 141–171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deen, K., Bondoc, I., Camp, A., Estioca, S., Hwang, H., Shin, G. -H., Takahashi, M., Zenker, F., Zhong, J. C. (2017). Repetition brings success: Revealing knowledge of the passive voice Paper presented at BUCLD, Boston University, November 2017.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language, 65, 56–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2007). Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 197–238 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1998). Children’s passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 311–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehrke, B., & Grillo, N. (2008). How to become passive. In K. Grohmann (Ed.), Explorations of phase theory: Features, arguments, and interpretation at the interfaces (pp. 231–268). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (1996). Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 294–313.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Voice alternations (active, passive, middle). In J. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics (pp. 179–205). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, F., & Flora, J. (1982). Children’s use of get passives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 297–311 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., & Wexler, K. (2004). Who seems to rescue raising. Poster presented at GALANA, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, December 2004Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Martins, A. M., & Nunes, J. (2008). Perception and causative structures in English and European Portuguese: Phi-feature agreement and the distribution of bare and prepositional infinitives. Syntax, 11, 198–222.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lima Júnior, J. C., & Augusto, M. R. A. (2015). Is ‘smuggling’ really necessary? The most recent analyses of passive sentences reconsidered in terms of phasehood and cyclic movement. ReVEL, special edition, n.9. <[URL]>
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manetti, C. (2013) On the production of passives in Italian: Evidence form an elicited production task and a syntactic priming study with preschool children. In S. Bainz, N. Goldman, & R. Hawkes (Eds.), BUCLD 37 Proceedings Online Supplement (pp. 1–16).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P., Fox, D., Becker, J., & Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children’s early passives. Cognition, 19, 167–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives. Cognition, 121(2), 268–274.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., & Parisse, C. (2007). Codage et interprétation du langage spontané d’enfants de 1 à 3 ans. Corpus n°6 Interprétation, contextes, codage (pp. 55–78).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, G. (1998). Incomplete category fronting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orfitelli, R. M. (2012). Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D., & Frost, L. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, 195–267.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plunkett, B. (2002). Null subjects in child French interrogatives: A view from the York Corpus. In C. D. Pusch, & W. Raible (Eds.), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und gesprochene Sprache Script Oralia 126 (pp. 441–452). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reed, L. (2011). Get-passives. The Linguistic Review, 28, 41–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2001). Relativized minimality effects. In M. Baltin, & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 89–110). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (Ed), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structure 3 (pp. 223–251). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation ). MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouveret, A., & Vergnaud, J. R. (1980). Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 97–202.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1994). Passives and alternatives in children’s narratives in English, Spanish, German, and Turkish. In B. Fox, & P. Hopper (Eds.), Voice: Form and function (pp. 341–364). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snyder, W. (2007). Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snyder, W., & Hyams, N. (2015). Minimality effects in children’s passives. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 343–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. (2010). French reflexive se: Binding and merge locality. <[URL]>
Turner, E. A., & Rommetveit, R. (1967a). The acquisition of sentence voice and reversibility. Child Development, 38, 649–660.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1967b). Experimental manipulation of the production of active and passive voice in children. Language and Speech, 10, 169–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple spell-out. In S. D. Epstein, & N. Hornstein (Eds.) Working minimalism (pp. 251–282). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L., Brown, C., Bruhn-Garavito, J., Chen, D., Hirakawa, M., & Montrul, S. (1998). Psych verbs in second language acquisition. In E. Klein, & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 171–196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Nguyen, Emma & Lisa Pearl
2021. The link between lexical semantic features and children’s comprehension of English verbal be-passives. Language Acquisition 28:4 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue