Cover not available

In:Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition: In honor of Stephen Crain
Edited by Mineharu Nakayama, Yi-ching Su and Aijun Huang
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 60] 2017
► pp. 127–144

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6
The acquisition of the non-subject status of nominative objects in Japanese

 | Meiji Gakuin University
 | Meiji Gakuin University
 | University of Connecticut
Published online: 24 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.60.07san
Abstract
This paper examines the L1 acquisition of the Japanese nominative object construction and discusses its implication for the Universal Phase Requirement (UPR) Hypothesis in Wexler (2004) and Hirsch and Wexler (2007). Although the results of our first experiment could be interpreted as evidence against the UPR Hypothesis, we raise the question of whether this interpretation is legitimate, and discuss what should be considered in a suitable evaluation of the UPR Hypothesis with the nominative object construction. Given the finding in our second experiment, our third experiment provides some preliminary data that suggest that the L1 acquisition of the Japanese nominative object construction may support the UPR Hypothesis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Nominative objects” in Early Child Japanese: Spontaneous speech data
  • 3.Experiment 1: Sano, Shimada & Fujiwara (2014)
    • 3.1Participants and experimental design
    • 3.2Results and discussion
  • 4.Experiment 2: Shimada (2015)
    • 4.1Participants and experimental design
    • 4.2Results and discussion
  • 5.Experiment 3
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
References (36)
References
Babyonyshev, M., Ganger, J., Pesetsky, D. & Wexler, K. 2001. The maturation of grammatical principles: Evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 32:1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. 1988. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, C. 2011. On grammatical maturation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed.), 45–54. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Wexler, K. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In Parameter Setting, T. Roeper & E. Williams (eds), 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, S. & McKee, C. 1985. Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. Proceedings of NELS 15: 94–110. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments in the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, E. Bach & R. Harms (eds), 1–89. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Y. 2013. Zibun-anaphora in child Japanese and nominative objects in potential sentences. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed), 43–59. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirsch, C. & Wexler, K. 2007. The late acquisition of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, S. Dubinsky & B. Davies (eds), 35–70. New York NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoshi, H. 1999. Passives. In Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed), 191–235. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Machida, N., Miyagawa, S. & Wexler, K. 2004. A-chain maturation re-examined: Why Japanese children perform better on full unaccusatives than on passives. In MITWPL48 Plato’s Problems: Papers in Language Acquisition, A. Csirmaz, A. Gualmini & A. Nevins (eds), 91–112. Cambridge MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K. 1998. The Acquisition of Japanese Case-particles and the Theory of Case Checking. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyata, S. 2004. Japanese: Aki Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: Talkbank. 1-59642-055-3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyata, S. & Nisisawa, H. 2009. MiiPro – Asato Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-474-5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. MiiPro – Tomito Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-472-9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murasugi, K. & Kawamura, T. 2005. On the acquisition of scrambling in Japanese. In The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity, J. Sabel & M. Saito (eds), 221–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisisawa, H. & Miyata, S. 2009. MiiPro – Nanami Corpus. Pittsburgh, PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-473-7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. MiiPro – ArikaM Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-475-3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noji, J., Naka, N. & Miyata, S. 2004. Japanese: Noji Corpus. Pittsburgh PA: TalkBank. 1-59642-054-5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otsu, Y. 1997. Zibun futatabi (Zibun revisited). In Ninchi/Gengo no Seiritsu: Ningen no Kokoro no Hattatsu (Emergence of Cognition and Language: Development of Human Mind), Program Committee (ed), 113–122. Tokyo: Kuba Pro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. First language acquisition. In Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, N. Tsujimura (ed), 378–397. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, M. 2006. Subjects of complex predicates: A preliminary study. Stony Brook Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 172–188. Stony Brook, NY: Department of Linguistics, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sano, T. 2000. Issues on unaccusatives and passives in the acquisition of Japanese. In Proceedings of the First Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed), 1–21. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Remarks on theoretical accounts of Japanese children’s passive acquisition. In Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in Honor of Nina Hyams [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 54], M. Becker, J. Grinstead & J. Rothman (eds), 35–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sano, T., Endo, M. & Yamakoshi, K. 2001. Developmental issues in the acquisition of Japanese unaccusatives and passives. In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, A.H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (eds), 668–683. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sano, T., Shimada, H. & Fujiwara, Y. 2014. The lack of nominative-orientation for a Japanese anaphor zibun in L1 acquisition and its implications. In Proceedings of the 38th Boston University Conference on Language Development, W. Orman & M.J. Valleau (eds), 393–402. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, M. 2001. Non-canonical constructions in Japanese. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], A. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & M. Onishi (eds), 307–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimada, H. 2015. The acquisition of a Japanese anaphor zibun and the lack of external argument-orientation. Poster presented at the 6th Generative Approach to Language Acquisition North America at University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, M. 2010. Case valuation, phasehood, and nominative-accusative conversion in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 319–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takezawa, K. 1987. A Configurational Approach to Case-Marking in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wexler, K. 2004. Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 48: 159–209.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Tough-movement developmental delay: Another effect of phasal computation. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, M. Piattelli-Palmarini & R.C. Berwick (eds), 148–167. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue