Cover not available

In:Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 333–346

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Conclusion

Emerging issues in the acquisition of L2 Turkish and pedagogical considerations

 | Bogaziçi University
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.59.13gur
References (54)
References
Chang, F., Dell, G.S., Bock, J.K., & Griffin, Z.M. 2000. Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29: 217–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M. & Silva, R. 2010. Morphological structure in native and non-native language processing. Language Learning 60(1): 21–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. 1998. Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 42–63. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M. 2005. What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55: 1–25 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doughty, C. 1991. Second language acquisition does make a difference: evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, H.C. & Burt, M.K. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckman, F.R. 1977. Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27: 315–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Typological markedness and second language phonology. In Phonology and Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 36], J.G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckman, F.R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. 1988. On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics 9: 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1990. Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly 27: 91–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40(1): 83–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Philp, J., Reinders, H., & Erlam, R. 2009. Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S.M. 1979. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning 29: 327–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. 1982. From theory to practice. In On TESOL’ 81. M. Hines & W. Rutherford (eds), 120–139. Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In the Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, E. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Boston MA: Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hulstijn, J.H., & de Graaff, R. 1994. Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review 11: 97–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & Schmidt, R. 1996. Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 149–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. 1977. Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In On TESOL ‘77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice, H.D. Brown, C. Yorio & R. Crymes (eds), 144–158.Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The input hypothesis and its rivals. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Language, N. Ellis (ed.), 45–77. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics Across Cultures. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, J. Archibald (eds.), 102–29.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In The Role of Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 106–140. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 25: 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. 2008. Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 30, 31–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. 1981. On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3: 109–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myles, F. 2002. Second language acquisition (SLA) research: its significance for learning and teaching issues. Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies Good Practice Guide. <[URL]> (15 November 2015).
. 2013. Theoretical approaches. In The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 46–70. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, M. 1994. Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: implications for bilingualism. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Second Languages, N. Ellis (ed.), 393–419. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1985. Learnability and syllabus construction. In Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds), 23–76. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prévost, P. & White L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16: 103–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, L. 2012. Psycholinguistic techniques and resources in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research 28: 113–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. 1996. Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, C. 2005. Testing ESL Pragmatics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2008. Meaning in the Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) , M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (eds), 280–294. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
. 2014. The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 46(4): 543–559.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. & Ivanov, I. 2011. A more careful look at the syntax–discourse interface. Lingua 121: 637–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2003. Near-nativeness. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Daughty & M.H. Long (eds), 130–151. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M. 2008. Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly 42: 181−207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N. & Tomita, Y. 2010. Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2): 263–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. 1987. Markedness and second language acquisition: The question of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 261–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7:133–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003a. On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 19–42. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. & Evans, J. 1998. What kind of focus and on which forms? In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 139–155. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zobl, H. 1983. Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning 33: 292–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue