Cover not available

In:Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 165–191

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Syntax/semantics/pragmatics of yes/no question in second language Turkish

 | Middle East Technical University
 | Middle East Technical University
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.59.07gra
This paper examines the second language (L2) acquisition of the syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of Turkish yes/no (yn) questions across learners of different proficiency. Employing three tasks, we tested the participants’ knowledge of the syntax of yn questions, the semantic interpretations they assign to the construction, and their mastery of the pragmatic constraints that govern the use of various points of yn questions. Although the results show that the participants’ performance in all three areas we tested is commensurate with their overall proficiency in Turkish, the pragmatic competence of L2 learners seems to lag behind their competence in both syntax and semantics. This points to difficulties that interface phenomena pose to L2 learners, relative to narrow syntax.
References (41)
References
Anderson, B. 2008. Forms of evidence and grammatical development in the acquisition of adjective position in L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30: 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aygen, G. 2007. Q-particle. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 4: 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A. & Leonini, C. 2004. Subject Inversion in L2 Italian. In EUROSLA Yearbook 4, S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (eds), 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. 1999. Syntax-semantics interface. In MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 
Wilson, R.A. & F.C. Keil, 744–745. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. 1987. Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63: 544–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Hathorn, J. 2005. Quelque chose...de remarquable in English-French acquisition: Mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research 21: 291–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Sprouse, R. 2001. Mental design and (second) language epistemology: Adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research 17: 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flynn, S. 1983. A Study of the Effects of Principal Branching Direction in Second Language Acquisition: The Generalization of a Parameter of Universal Grammar from First to Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1987. A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition: Experimental Studies in Anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franceschina, F. 2001. Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research 17(3): 213–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.C. 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagstrom, P. 1998. Decomposing Questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 2000. The movement of question particles. In NELS 30: Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall & J.-Y. Kim (eds), 275–286. 
Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. 1997. The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis.’ Second Language Research 13: 187–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B.D. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Ionin, T. & Wexler, K. 2002. Why is “is” easier than “-s”?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research 18: 95–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ioup, G. 1984. Is there a structural foreign accent? A comparison of syntactic and phonological errors in second language acquisition. Language Learning 34: 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P. & Rothman, J. 2008. Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. In EUROSLA Yearbook 8, L. Roberts, F. Myles & A. David (eds), 135–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamalı, B. 2011. The Question Particle in Turkish: Consequences for the Interfaces. In Online complement to Proceedings of WCCFL 28, M. Byram Washburn, S. Ouwayda, Ch. Ouyang, B. Yin, C. Ipek, L. Marston & A. Walker (eds). <[URL]> (22 January, 2014).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 1998. Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14: 359–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, G. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liceras, J. 1988. Syntax and stylistics: More on the pro-drop parameter. In Learnability and Second Languages: A Book of Readings, J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. Van Buren (eds), 71–93. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lozano, C. 2009. Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K.I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & 1997. OPC effects in the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 1: Developing Grammars, A.T. Pérez-Leroux & W. Glass (eds), 149–165. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & Glass, W. 1999. Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: Probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research 15: 220–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. 2009. Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 951–973. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2010. Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition.Lingua 120: 2444–2462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2005. Selective optionality in language development. In Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265], L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds), 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Gradedness and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In Gradience in Grammar, G. Fanselow, C. Féry, R. Vogel & M. Schlesewsky (eds), 106–123. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. & Filiaci, F. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22: 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 195–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Sorace, A. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 30) , D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 653–64. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Valenzuela, E. 2005. L2 Ultimate Attainment and the Syntax-Discourse Interface: The Acquisition of Topic Constructions in Non-Native Spanish and English. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Valenzuela, E. 2006. L2 endstate grammars and incomplete acquisition of the Spanish CLLD constructions. In Inquiries in Linguistic Development: In Honor of Lydia White, R. Slabakova, S. Montrul & P. Prévost (eds), 283–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. 2011. Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121: 577–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue