In:Generative Linguistics and Acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams
Edited by Misha Becker, John Grinstead and Jason Rothman
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 54] 2013
► pp. 35–64
Remarks on theoretical accounts of Japanese children’s passive acquisition
Published online: 18 April 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.54.02san
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.54.02san
This paper compares two theoretical accounts of developmental delay in children’s acquisition of verbal passives. First, Borer and Wexler (1987) and subsequent works attempt to explain the delay by proposing that young children lack the ability to form an A-chain (A-chain Deficit Hypothesis (ACDH)). Second, Fox and Grodzinsky (1998) suggest an alternative explanation by proposing that young children have difficulty with θ-transmission (θ-transmission Difficulty Hypothesis). I will examine the empirical predictions of the ACDH with two kinds of Japanese data: the comparison between long passive and ‘long passive-unaccusative amalgam’ and the comparison between long passive and short passive. I will show that the predictions of the ACDH are not borne out and suggest that the observed new data can be accounted for by the θ-transmission Difficulty Hypothesis. Keywords: A-chain Deficit Hypothesis; by-phrase; passive; theta-transmission; unaccusative
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Sano, Tetsuya, Hiroyuki Shimada & Yoshiki Fujiwara
2017. The acquisition of the non-subject status of nominative objects in Japanese. In Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 60], ► pp. 127 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
