In:Practising Stylistics: Essays in Honour of Paul Simpson
Edited by Clara Neary, Simon Statham and Peter Stockwell
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 45] 2026
► pp. 12–23
Chapter 1: VignetteCharles Dickens, teacher
Satire and metaphor
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Charles Dickens’ general interest in education and educational reform is well known, but aside from
Hard Times in particular his own knowledge of contemporary methods and discourses of teaching and
learning has not been analysed in detail. In this chapter, Katie Wales illustrates examples of satirical manipulation in
Dickens’ novels, especially Hard Times and Dombey and Son, drawing out some of the
prevailing conceptual metaphors in pedagogic discursive practices. She shows how, through stylistic cues, he produces a
humorous but damning critique of harmful teaching methods — a critique that stands the test of time. In the process, Wales’
detailed analysis forces a re-appraisal not only of Dickens’ own achievement as a satirist, but also of ideas of satire
generally, and of conceptual metaphor theory itself.
Keywords: conceptual metaphor, Dickens, satire, teaching, educational reform
Article outline
- Dickens and nineteenth-century teaching methods
- Dickens’ satire of (conceptual) metaphors of teaching
- Dickens’ satire re-considered
- Conclusion and further research
References
References (33)
Birchenough, C. (1914). History
of elemental education in England and Wales from 1800 to the present day. University Tutorial Press.
Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor
and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor
for? In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and
thought (pp. 481–532). Cambridge University Press.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Bridges
to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and
language. In L. Cameron, & G. Low (Eds.), Researching
and applying
metaphor (pp. 149–176). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The
neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge University Press.
Low, G. (2008). Metaphor
and education. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 212–231). Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D. (2008). Materiality:
An introduction. In D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1–60). Duke University Press.
Pfaff, K. L., & Gibbs, Jr R. W. (1997). Authorial
intentions in understanding satirical
texts. Poetics 25, 45–70.
Reddy, M. J. (1993). The
conduit metaphor? A case of frame conflict in our language about
language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and thought. Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–201.
Rudd, D. (2013). Reading
the child in children’s literature: An heretical approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Semino, E., & Steen, G. (2008). Metaphor
in literature. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 232–346). Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, P. (2000). Satirical
humour and cultural context. In T. Bex, M. Burke, & P. Stockwell (Eds.), Contextualised
stylistics; In honour of Peter
Verdonk (pp. 243–266). Rodopi.
(2003). On
the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satiric humour. John Benjamins.
Sticht, T. G. (1993). Educational
uses of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and
thought (pp. 621–632). Cambridge University Press.
