Cover not available

In:Style as Motivated Choice: In memory of Peter Verdonk (1934–2021)
Edited by Michael Burke and Joanna Gavins
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 44] 2025
► pp. 114–129

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Mechanical inelasticity in discourse

A Bergsonian perspective on dialogue, humour and style

 | Liverpool University
Published online: 8 May 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.44.07sim
Abstract
This chapter explores the stylistics of humour with a particular focus on dialogue in television situation comedies. Having acknowledged previous stylistic work on verbal humour where the focus has been on structural elements in discourse, the present chapter moves on to balance research in linguistic pragmatics with philosophical investigations into humour. Use is made of French philosopher Henri Bergson’s theory of “the comic” and especially of Bergson’s characterisation of humour as a kind of rigidity within a mechanical arrangement. The analytic part of the chapter applies this blended pragmatic-philosophical stylistic model to passages of dialogue in popular sitcoms, respectively, Father Ted and Big Bang Theory. It is argued that the humour impulse in both sitcoms is often engendered by dialogue which can be understood as the linguistic embodiment of Bergsonian “mechanical inelasticity” in both discourse routines and discourse strategies. Adding to the toolkit of discourse stylistics, the chapter offers a new framework of analysis for the understanding of comic dialogue in, and beyond, television sitcoms.
Article outline
  • Discourse stylistics and verbal humour, revisited
  • Bergson (1859–1941) and the meaning of the comic
  • Inelasticity in discourse: Nerds, geeks and a very sarcastic priest
  • Concluding remarks
  • References
  • Transcription symbols used
References (46)
References
Attardo, S. 2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. 2012. Constructing “nerdiness”: Characterisation in the Big Bang Theory. Multilingua 31: 199–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri [1900] 2007. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Trans. Cloudesley Brereton & Fred Rothwell. Wokingham, UK: Dodo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bex, A., Stockwell, P. Burke   (eds.) 2000. Contextualised Stylistics: In Honour of Peter Verdonk. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, M. 2005. Laugher and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bremel, A. 1982. A History of Farce: From Aristophanes to Woody Allen. NY: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, G. A. and Fox Tree, J. E. 2002. Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol 17: 99–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton, D. 1980. Dialogue and Discourse London: RKP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, R. A. 2000. Afterword. In Bex et al.., 267–268.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. 1997. Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: the pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes 23: 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Eye-rolling, irony and embodiment. In The Diversity of Irony. Athanasiadou, A. & Colston, H. L. (eds.), 211–234. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronin, M. E. 2018. “Feck Off”: Exploring the Relationship between Impoliteness, Laughter and Humour in the British-Irish Sitcoms Father Ted, Black Books and The IT Crowd. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
Durant, J. and Miller, J. (eds.) 1988. Laughing Matters: A Serious Look at Humour. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, M. 2009. Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Linguistic approaches to (non)humorous irony. International Journal of Humor Research 27(4): 537–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. and Izett, C. 2005. Irony as persuasive communication. In Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, H. Colston & A. Katz (eds.), 131–151. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jorgensen, J. 1996. The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 613–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaiser, M. 2004. A history of “ludicrous”. English Literary History 71(3): 631–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, E. 2011. Irony via “surrealism”. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Dynel, M. (ed.), 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khurana, N. 2023. The humorous body: a Bergsonian reading of Laurence Sterne’s The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. The European Journal of Humour Research, 11(4): 93–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korostenskiene, J. and Lieponyte, A. 2019. Irony, sarcasm and parody in the American sitcom Modern Family. Israeli Journal for Humor Research 8(1): 51–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. 2020. Irony and Sarcasm: A Biography of Two Troublesome Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. and Glucksberg, S. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 347–386.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. and Roberts, R. 1995. Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity 10: 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandala, S. 2016. Twentieth-Century Drama as Ordinary Talk: Speaking between the Lines. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1988. Jokes and joking: A serious laughing matter. In Durant and Miller, 5–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morreall, J. 1986. The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Philosophy of humor. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [URL] [last accessed 8 November 2023]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilkington, A. E. 1976. Bergson and his Influence: A Reassessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popa-Wyatt, M. 2020. Hyperbolic figures. In The Diversity of Irony, A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (eds.), 91–106. Walter de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, K. 2010. Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. 2000. Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 483–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, P. 2000. Satirical humour and cultural context: with a note on the curious case of Father Todd Unctuous. In Bex et al.., 243–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
forthcoming. Irony: Pragmatic, Social and Legal Consequences. London: Bloomsbury.
Sorlin, S. 2016. Language and Manipulation in House of Cards: A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2017. The Language of Surrealism London: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabacaru, S. 2020. Faces of sarcasm: Exploring raised eyebrows with sarcasm in French political debates. In The Diversity of Irony, A. Athanasiadou & H. L. Colston (eds.), 256–277. Walter de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabacaru, S. & Lemmens, M. (2014. Raised eyebrows as gestural triggers in humour: The case of sarcasm and hyper-understanding. European Journal of Humour Research 2(2): 11–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Mulken, M., Burgers, C. and van der Plas, B. 2011. Wolves, confederates, and the happy few: The influence of comprehension, agreement, and group membership on the attitude toward irony. Discourse Processes 48: 50–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verdonk, P. 1997. Het bevrijde icoon: Van klassieke retorica naar cognitieve stilistiek. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers AUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Stylistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. The Stylistics of Poetry: Context, Cognition, Discourse, History. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Riddling: The dominant rhetorical device in W.H. Auden’s “The Wanderer”. In Style, Rhetoric and Creativity in Language: In Memory of Walter (Bill) Nash (1926–2015), Simpson, P. (ed.), 77–84. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue