In:Transformative Reading
Olivia Fialho
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 42] 2024
► pp. 225–245
References
Published online: 7 August 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.42.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.42.refs
ABTE. 2003. Report by the Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia Educacional [Report by the Brazilian Association of Educational Technology]. 〈[URL] and [URL]〉 (25 November 2009)
. 2004. Report by the Associação Brasileira de Tecnologia Educacional [Report by the Brazilian Association of Educational Technology]. [URL]; [URL] (25 November 2009)
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. 1984. Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Andringa, E. 1990. Verbal data on literary understanding: A proposal for protocol analysis on two levels. Poetics 19: 231–57.
Arbib, M. A., Billard, A., Iacoboni, M., & Oztop, E. 2000. Synthetic brain imaging: Grasping, mirror neurons and imitation. Neural Networks 13: 975–97.
Archer, D., & Culpeper, J. 2009. Identifying key sociophilological usage in plays and trial proceedings (1640–1760): An empirical approach via corpus annotation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2): 286–309.
Aristotle. 1984. Poetics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, J. Barnes (ed.), Vol. II. Princeton: Bollingen Series LXXI.2, Princeton University Press.
Armstrong, P. 2013. How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. 2007. ‘Brain Waves are Stethoscopes’: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research 1160: 69–81.
Atwood, M. 1995. Me, She, and It. In Who’s Writing This? Notations on the Authorial I with Self-Portraits, D. Halpern (ed.), 16–18. Hogewell: Ecco Press.
Auracher, J. 2006. Biological Correlates of Suspense: an Empirical Investigation. 10th IGEL Conference (International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media) (pp.5–9 Aug.). Chiemsee, Germany: Conference Presentation.
Bachmann, T. 2000. Microgenetic Approach to the Conscious Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bailey, K. D. 1975. Cluster analysis. In Sociological Methodology, D. R. Heise (ed.), 59–128. San Francisco: Jossey-Bas.
1994. Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage University Papers Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Barthes, R. 1977[1968]. The death of the author. In Roland Barthes: Image Music Text, S. Heath (trans.), 142–149. London: Fontana Press.
Bartsch, A., Kalch, A., & Oliver, M. B. 2014. Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 26(3): 125–40.
Becker, H. 1940. Constructive typology in the social sciences. In Contemporary Social Theory, H. E. Barnes, H. Becker & F. B. Becker (eds.). New York: D. Appleton Century.
Bergen, B. K., & Chang, N. C. 2005. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In M. Fried & J. Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-Language Dimensions, 147–190. [Constructional Approaches to Language 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blair, H. 1762[2005]. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, L. Ferreira-Buckley & M. S. Halloran (eds.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. 2003. Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literary Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. 2009. When You and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20(1): 27–32.
Burke, M., Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S. (eds.). 2016. Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments. [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Burke, M., & Troscianko, E. T. 2017. Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues Between Literature and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, C. 1985. Systemic Linguistics: Theory and Applications. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.
Caracciolo, M., Guédon, C., Kukkonen, K., & Müller, S. 2017. The promise of an embodied narratology: Integrating cognition, representation and interpretation. In Emerging Vectors of Narratology. P. K. Hansen, J. Pier, P. Roussin, & W. Schmid (eds.), 435–459. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Caracciolo, M., & Van Duuren, T. 2015. Changed by literature? A critical review of psychological research on the effects of reading fiction. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 17(4): 517–539.
Carnap, R. 1963. The philosopher replies. In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, P. A. Schilpp (ed.), 859–1013. Illinois: Open Court.
Carter, R. 1999. Common language: Corpus, creativity and cognition. Language and Literature, 8(3): 195–216.
Carter, R., & McRae, J. 1996. Language, Literature and the Learner: Creative Classroom Practice. London & New York: Longman.
Carter, R., & Nash, W. 1990. Seeing through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: B. Blackwell.
Carvalho, M. M. 2001. Ler por prazer/ler por estudo: Uma dicotomia viável? In Conhecimento e Imaginação: Coletânia dos Trabalhos do I ECEL, S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro, & R. Figueiredo (eds.), 150–166. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.
Chace, W. M. 2009. The decline of the English department: How it happened and what could be done to reverse it. American Scholar, 78(4), 〈[URL]〉
Coady, R. J., & Johannessen, J. 2006. The Book that Changed my Life: 71 Remarkable Writers Celebrate the Books that Matter Most to Them. New York: Gotham Books.
Cohen, T. 1999. Identifying with metaphor: Metaphors of personal identification. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57: 399–409.
Connell, L., & Lynott, D. 2011. Modality switching costs emerge in concept creation as well as retrieval. Cognitive Science 35: 763–778.
Cooper, R. K., & Sawaf, A. 2003. Emotional Intelligence in Leadership. Istanbul, Turkey: Sistem Press.
Copeland, R. 2021. Emotion and the History of Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. 1964. The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence. New York: WiIey.
Cuijpers, P. 1997. Bibliotherapy in unipolar depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experiential Psychiatry 28: 139–147.
Culler, J. 1975. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Culpeper, J. 2009. Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(1): 29–59.
Cupchik, G. C., & László, J. 1994. The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition & Emotion 8(4): 297–312.
Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. 1998. Emotional effects of reading: Excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts 25(6): 363–377.
Daiches, D. 1993. Katherine Mansfield and the search for truth. In Critical Essays on Katherine Mansfield, R. B. Nathan (ed.). New York, Maxwell MacMillan International.
Damasio, A. R. 1999. The Feeling of what Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.
de Beaugrande, R. 1985. Poetry and the Ordinary Reader: A Study in Literary Response. Empirical Studies in the Arts 3: 1–21.
de Certeau, M. 1984. Reading as poaching. In The Practice of Everyday Life, M. de Certeau, & T. S. Rendall, 165–176. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dimberg, U., & Petterson, M. 2000. Facial reactions to happy and angry facial expressions: Evidence for right hemisphere dominance. Psychophysiology 37(5): 693–696.
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. 2000. Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 11(1): 86–89.
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A. 1993. Literary processing and interpretation: towards empirical foundations. Poetics 22: 5–33.
dos Anjos, M. J. F. G. (2024). O Modelo Transformative Reading na Interpretacao de Obras Literarias e na Percepcao de Si e dos Outros: Projeto Artistico Interdisciplinar do 1.o Ciclo – Colegio de Sao Jose – Ramalhao. PhD dissertation, Universidade da Beira Interior.
Dreyfus, H. L. 1972[1992]. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Driver, H. E., & Kroeber, A. L. 1932. Quantitative Expression of Cultural Relationships. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eco, U. 1979. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. 1983. Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, NS 221.4616: 1208–1210.
Ellis, J. M. 1997. Literature Lost: Social Agendas and the Corruption of The Humanities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ellis, R. D. 2005. Curious Emotions: Roots of Consciousness and Personality in Motivated Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1): 107–115.
Emmott, C. 1997. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
1999. Embodied in a constructed world: Narrative processing, knowledge representation, and indirect anaphora. In Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics, K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik, & L. Noordman (eds.), 2–27. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 176]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ferrari, M., Weststrate, N., & Petro, A. 2013. Stories of wisdom to live by: Developing wisdom in a narrative mode. In Scientific Study of Personal Wisdom: From Contemplative Traditions to Neuroscience, M. Ferrari & N. M. Weststrate (eds.), 137–164. Dordrecht: Springer.
Fialho, O. 2002. A influência do professor e do monitor no processo de conscientização literária. In Fatos e Ficções – Estudos Empíricos De Literatura, S. Zyngier & A. C. Valente (eds.), 163–177. Rio de Janeiro: Serviço de Publicações da Faculdade de Letras da UFRJ.
2005. Pelos Caminhos Da Leitura: Estudo Empírico Sobre Refamiliarização e Afeto [Through the Paths of Reading: An Empirical Study of Refamiliarization and Affect]. M.A. Thesis, UFRJ, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
2007. Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Special issue on Foregrounding. Language & Literature 16(2): 105–23.
2012. Self-Modifying Experiences in Literary Reading: A Model for Reader Response. PhD Dissertation, University of Alberta. 〈[URL]〉
2016. Transformative reading experiences: A descriptive phenomenological study. Summary paper submitted to the IGEL Conference, Chicago, USA, July 6-9, 2016.
2017. Transformative reading: Literary experience and the awareness of empathy in fiction and in life. Paper presented at the Conference on Literacy, Empathy and Social Sustainability. Halmstad University, Sweden, 7 September 2017.
2018. Deepening readers’ perceptions of self and others: The role of enactment-imagery, resonance, and sympathy. Paper presented at the IGEL Conference, Stavanger, Norway, July 27, 2018.
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts and Humanities. Special Issue on The Place of the Cognitive in Literary Studies. Ed. Karin Kukkonen, Anežka Kuzmičová, Steen Ledet Christiansen, Merja Polvinen 6(1): 1692532.
Fialho, O., & van Zundert, J. (2023). Reconceptualizing Processes in Transformative Reading. Paper presented at IGEL 2023, Monopoli, Italy, 28–30 September, 2023.
Fialho, O. & Hoeken, H. (in prep.). Transformative reading: An empirical model.
Fialho, O., & Zyngier, S. 2003. Reading preferences: A comparative study. In Pontes & Transgressões: Estudos Empíricos de Processos Culturais, S. Zyngier, P. Pinheiro & R. Figueiredo (eds.), 56–66. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Fialho, O., Moffat, C., & Miall, D. S. 2010. An Empirical Study of Students’ Concepts of Literary Education. IGEL Conference (International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature and Media), (7–11 Jul. 2010). Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D. S. 2011a. Interpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education 45(3): 236–253.
2011b. Pedagogische strategieën voor literaire educatie: Een empirische studie. In De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar De Invloed Van Het Lezen, F. Hakemulder (ed.), 246–266. Delft: Eburon.
2012. Experiencing or interpreting literature: Wording instructions. In Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT, M. Burke, S. Csabi, L. Week & J. Zerkowitz (eds.), 58–74. London, New York: Continuum.
Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R., & Cohen, D. 1982. Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science 218.4568: 179–181.
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. 2006. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6): 825–850.
Fish, S. E. 1970. Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics. New Literary History 2(1): 123–62.
1980. Is there a Text in this Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fitts, K., & Lalicker, W. B. 2004. Invisible hands: A manifesto to resolve institutional and curricular hierarchy in English studies. College English 66(4): 427–51.
Fleiss, J. L., & Zubin, J. 1969. On the methods and theory of clustering. Multivariate Behavioral Research 4: 235–250.
Fogassi, L., & Ferrari, P. F. 2007. Mirror neurons and the evolution of embodied language. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(3): 136–141.
Foroni, F., & Semin, G. 2009. Language that puts you in touch with your bodily feelings: The multimodal responsiveness of affective expressions. Psychological Science 20(8): 974–980.
Foucault, M. 1995. What is an Author?. In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, S. Burke (ed.), 233–46. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Galbraith, M. 1995. Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (eds.), 19–59. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gallagher, S., & Marcel, A. J. 1999. The self in contextualized action. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(4): 4–30.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. 2008. The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. London and New York: Routledge.
Gallese, V. 2006. Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Research 1079: 15–24.
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12): 493–501.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. 2005. The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3–4): 455–479.
Gallup Organization. 1978. Book Reading and Library Usage: A Study of Habits and Perceptions / Conducted for the American Library Association. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.
Garvin, P. (ed.). 1964. A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Gendlin, E. T. 1978. Befindlichkeit: Heidegger and the philosophy of psychology. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry 16: 1–3.
1997. Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning: A Philosophical and Psychological Approach to the Subjective. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Gerrig, R. J. 1993. Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Lima, P., & Francozo, E. 2004. Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7): 1189–1210.
Giorgi, A. 1985. Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh; NJ: Duquesne University Press.
1992. Description versus interpretation: Competing alternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 23(2): 119–135.
2009. The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Gold, J. 1990. Read for Your Life: Literature as a Life Support System. Markham, Ont.: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
Goleman, D. 1998. Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.
Goleman, D. P. 1995. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.
2008b. Measure for measure. Boston Globe, 11 May 2008, 〈[URL]〉 (5 June 2011).
Gould, S. J. 2011. The Hedgehog, the Fox and the Magister’s Pox: Mending the Gap Between Science and the Humanities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Graff, G. 1987. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Green, M. C. 2004. Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal 38(2): 247–266.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5): 701–721.
Gribble, J. 1983. Literary Education: A Revaluation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16(2): 240–246.
Grosz, E. A. 1995. Space, Time, and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies. New York and London: Routledge.
Hakemulder, J. 2000. The Moral Laboratory: Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-Knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2001. How to make alle menschen brüder: Literature in a multicultural and multiform society. In Psychology and Sociology of Literature, D. Schram & G. J. Steen (eds.), 225–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2008. Imagining what could happen: Effects of taking the role of a character on social cognition. In Directions in Empirical Literary Studies, S. Zyngier, M. Bortolussi, A. Chesnokova, & J. Auracher (eds.), 139–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hakemulder, F. 2020. Finding meaning through literature: ‘Foregrounding’as an emergent effect. Anglistik 31(1): 91–110.
Hakemulder, F. & van Peer, W. 2016. Empirical stylistics. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 189–207. London: Bloomsbury.
Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., & Bal, M. 2016. Learning from literature: Empirical research on readers in schools and at the workplace. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments, M. Burke, O. Fialho, & S. Zyngier (eds.), 19–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Balint, K., & Doicaru, M. M. (eds.). 2017. Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hakemulder, F., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., Brokerhof Schrijvers, M., Koek, I., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (in prep.). Wat Kan Je Doen Met Literatuur? Zelfinzicht En Mensenkennis Door Lezen En Groepsactiviteiten In Onderwijs En Op De Werkvloer.
Halasz, L., Short, M., & Varga, Á. 2002. A cross-cultural study of fictional and non-fictional text understanding. Poetics 30(3): 195–219.
Hall, G. 2001. The poetics of everyday language. CAUCE: Revista de Filología y su Didáctica 24: 69–86.
Halliday, M. A. 1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3): 322–361.
1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Languageand Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Hannevik, A. 2001. Fra Litteraturhistorie Til Litteraturvitenskap: Allmenn Litteraturvitenskap Ved Universitetet I Oslo: Skisse Av En Faghistorie. Vol. 2/2001. Skriftserie (Forum for Universitetshistorie: Trykt Utg.). Oslo: Forum for Universitetshistorie, Universitetet I Oslo.
Harker, W. J. 1996. Toward a defensible psychology of literary interpretation. In Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, E. R. MacNealy (ed.), 645–658. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hasan, R. 1984. The nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 13. [Reprinted in Hasan, R. 1996. Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning – Selected Papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (eds.), 51–72. London: Cassell.]
Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. 2004. Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping 21(3): 191–201.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. 2004. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41(2): 301–307.
Herman, D. 1994. Textual “you” and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s “A Pagan Place”. Style 28(3): 378–410.
Hickok, G. 2014. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition. W.W. Norton & Company.
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. 1994. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist 49(6): 493–504.
2003. The willing suspension of disbelief: A neuro-pscychoanalytic view. PsyArt: A Hyperlink Journal for the Psychological Study of the Arts. 22 January 2003, 〈[URL]〉 (19 July 2023).
Huber, M. 2014. Towards a New, Dynamic Concept of Health: Its Operationalisation and Use in Public Health and Healthcare, and in Evaluating Health Effects of Food. PhD Dissertation. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
Husserl, E. 1913[1983]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (Vol. 1). (F. Kersten, trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. (T. D. Evanston, ed.) IL: Northwestern University Press.
1971[1980]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Third Book: Phenomenology and the Foundations of the Sciences (Vol. 3). (T. E. Klein, & W. E. Pohl, trans.) The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
1913[2001]. Logical Investigations (from the Second German Edition of Logische Untersuchungen, 1913). (T. J. Moran, ed.) London: Routledge.
IDEB. 2011. Índice de Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica [Index of the Development of Basic Education]. INEP. [URL] (10 August 2011)
Ingarden, R. 1973. The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. (T. G. Grabowicz, ed.) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Iser, W. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
1980. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jacobs, A. M. 2015. Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16(9). 16 April 2015 〈 〉 (19 July 2023)
Jakobson, R. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language. E. T. Sebeok (ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Jandre, J., & Fialho, O. 2005. Flow + Foregrounding: A possible relation? In Venturas & Desventuras: Coletânea Dos Trabalhos do V ECEL, S. Zyngier, V. Viana, & F. Fausto (eds.), 87–96. Rio de Janeiro: Setor de Publicações Faculdade de Letras, UFRJ.
Jauss, H. R. 1982. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. (T. Bahti, trans.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jeannerod, M. 1994. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 1874244.
Jeffries, L. 2008. The role of style in reader-involvement: Deictic shifting in contemporary poems. Journal of Literary Semantics 37(1): 69–85.
Johnson, D. 2012. Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences 52: 150–155.
Jung-Beeman, M. 2005. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(11): 512–518.
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. 2012. Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(1): 1–19.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. 2013. Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 342(6156): 377–380.
Kneepkens, E. W., & Zwaan, R. A. 1994. Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics 23: 125–138.
Koopman, E. 2016a. Reading Suffering: An Empirical Enquiry into Empathic and Reflective Responses to Literary Narratives. PhD Dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit.
Krijnen, A. F. 2007. There Is More (s) in Television: Studying the Relationship between Television and Moral Imagination. PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Kuijpers, M. M., & Hakemulder, F. 2018. Understanding and appreciating literary texts through rereading. Discourse Processes 55(7): 619–641.
Kuijpers, M., & Miall, D. S. 2011. Bodily involvement in literary reading: An experimental study of readers’ bodily experiences during reading. In De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar De Invloed Van Het Lezen, E. F. Hakemulder (ed.), 160–174. Delft: Eburon.
Kuiken, D. (personal communication). Attitudes Toward Poetry Questionnaire.
Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. 2001. Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(1).
2002. Phenomenological approaches to the temporality of reading experience. Paper presented during the 8th Biannual Conference of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature (IGEL), August 21–24. Pécs, Hungary.
Kuiken, D., & Sikora, S. 1993. The impact of dreams on waking thoughts and feelings. In SUNY Series in Dream Studies: The Functions of Dreaming, A. Moffitt, M. Kramer, & R. Hoffman. (eds.), 419–476. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P. 2012. The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature 2(2): 243–272.
Kuiken, D., Carey, R., & Nielsen, T. 1987. Moments of affective insight: Their phenomenon and relations to selected individual differences. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 6: 341–64.
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. 2004. Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today 25(2): 171–203.
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D. S., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A. 2004. Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes 38(2): 267–86.
Kuiken, D., Schopflocher, D., & Wild, T. C. 1989. Numerically aided methods in phenomenology: A demonstration. Journal of Mind and Behavior 10(4): 373–392.
Kukkonen, K. 2019. 4E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuperberg, G. R. 2007. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 1146: 23–49.
1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lauring, J. O. 2014. Literature. In Introduction to Neuroaesthetics: The Neuroscientific Approach to Aesthetic Experience, Artistic Creativity, and Arts Appreciation, S. Martin, & J. O. Lauring (eds.). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Lazarus, R. S. 1982. Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37(9), 1019–1024.
LeDoux, J. E. 1996. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Lehrer, D., Leschke, J., Ihachimi, S., Vasiliu, A., & Weiffen, B. 2007. Negative results in social science. European Political Science 6: 51–68.
Leigh, R. D. 1950. The Public Library in the United States: The General Report of the Public Library Inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Link, C. L., & Hopf, H. A. 1946. People and Books: A Study of Reading and Book-Buying Habits. New York: Book Industry Committee, Book Manufacturer’s Institute.
Lloyd, B. F., & Gannon, P. M. 2000. Personality as the predictor of treatment experiences: A combined focus on relaxation and catharsis. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 19: 39–58.
Lodge, D. 1977. The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
1978. The language of modernist fiction: Metaphor and metonymy. In Modernism, 1890–1930, M. Bradbury & J. W. McFarlane (eds.), 481–496. Hassocks: Harvester.
Long, E. 2003. Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Longden, E., Davis, P., Billington, J., Lampropoulou, S., Farrington, G., Magee, F., Walsh, E., & Corcoran, R. 2015. Shared reading: Assessing the intrinsic value of a literature-based health intervention. Medical Humanities 41: 113–120.
Louw, W. E. 2008. Consolidating Empirical Method in Data-Assisted Stylistics: Towards a Corpus-Attested Glossary of Literary Terms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ltd, B. M. 2000. Reading the Situation: Book Reading, Buying and Borrowing Habits in Britain. London: Book Marketing Limited.
Mansfield, K. 1922. Miss Brill. In The Garden-Party and Other Stories, K. Mansfield, 182–189. New York: Alfred J. Knopf Inc.
Mansfield, K., O’Sullivan, V. & Scott, M. S. 1984. The Collected Letters of Katherine Mansfield. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mar, R. A. 2011. The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology 62(1): 103–134.
Mar, R. A. & Oatley, K. 2008. The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(3): 173–192.
Martindale, C. & Dailey, A. 1995. I. A. Richards revisited: Do people agree on their interpretations of literature? Poetics 23: 299–314.
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. 1994. Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Teaching. London and New York: Longman.
McConkey, K. M. & Nogrady, H. 1986. Visual elaboration scale: Analysis of individual and group versions. Journal of Mental Imagery 10: 37–46.
McIntyre, D. 2006. Point of View in Plays: A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Viewpoint in Drama and Other Text-Types. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, K. M. 1977. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by Human Neonates. Science 198.4312: 75–78.
1989. Imitation in newborn-infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology 25(6): 954–962.
1995. Infants’ understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychology. In The Body and the Self, J. L. Bermúdez, A. Marcel & N. Eilan. Cambridge: MIT/Bradford Press.
1989. Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition & Emotion 3(1): 55–78.
1996. Empowering the reader: Literary response and classroom learning. Advances in Discourse Processes 52: 463–478.
2009. Neuroaesthetics of literary reading. In Neuroaesthetics, M. Sko, O. Vartanian, C. Martindale & A. Berleant (eds.), 233–247. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.
2011a. Science in the perspective of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature 1(1): 7.
2011b. A neurophysiological approach to the elements of literariness. In De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar De Invloed Van Het Lezen, E. F. Hakemulder (ed.), 148–159. Delft: Eburon.
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (personal communication). Current Reading Questionnaire.
(personal communication). Reading History Questionnaire.
Miall. D. & Kuiken, D. (1994a). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes 17, 337–352.
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. 1994b. Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics 22: 389–407.
1995. Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English 29(1): 37–58.
Miall, D. & Kuiken, D. 1999. What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes 28(2): 121–138.
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. 2001. Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, E. W. Chatman (ed.), 289–301. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. 2002. A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics 30(4): 221–241.
Mukařovský, J. 1964. Standard Language and Poetic Language. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Mumper, M. L. & Gerrig, R. J. 2017. Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 11(1): 109–120.
NEA. 2004. Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.
. 2007. To Read or Not to Read: A Question of National Consequence. Washington D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.
. 2009. Reading on the Rise: A New Chapter in American Literacy. Washington: National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.
. 2018. U.S. Trends in Arts Attendance and Literary Reading: 2002–2017. National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.
. 2020. How do we Read? Let’s Count the Ways: Comparing Digital, Audio, and Print-Only Readers. Washington D.C.: National Endowment for the Arts, NEA.
Neary, C. 2010. Negotiating Narrative Empathy in Gandhi’s Life-Writing. PALA 2010 Conference Proceedings, University of Genoa, Italy.
Nell, V. 1988. Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nelson, K. 2003. Narrative and the Emergence of a Consciousness of Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newen, A., De Bruin, L. & Gallagher, S. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Newton, N. 1993. The sensorimotor theory of cognition. Pragmatics & Cognition 1(2): 267–305.
1996. Foundations of Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nishitani, N., & Hari, R. 2000. Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Representation for Action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 913–918.
Nussbaum, M. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oatley, K. 1992. Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1994. A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics: Journal for Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts 23(1–2): 53–74.
1999. Why Fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology 3(2): 101–117.
Oliver, M. B. & Bartsch, A. 2011. Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 23(1): 29–33.
Oliver, M. B. & Raney, A. A. 2001. Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication 61: 984–1004.
O Globo Online. 2008. Alunos do ensino fundamental vão mal em matemática e leitura, revela pesquisa da Unesco, 25 June 2008, 〈[URL]〉 (26 November 2009).
O’Shaughnessy, B. 1995. Proprioception and the body image. In Self-Consciousness and the Body: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, J. L. Bermudez, A. J. Marcel & N. M. Eilan, (eds.), 175–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Palmer, B., Walls, M., Burgess, Z. & Stough, C. 2001. Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 22 (1): 5–10.
Panksepp, J. 1998. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
2000. The neuro-evolutionary cusp between emotions and cognitions: Implications for understanding consciousness and the emergence of a unified mind science. Consciousness and Emotion 1: 15–54.
Pattison, R. 1982. On Literacy: The Politics of the Word from Homer to the Age of Rock. New York: Oxford University Press.
Penne, S. 2013. Elevene, litteraturen og lærebøkene i norsk på ungdomstrinnet. In Læreboka: Studier av Ulike Læreboktekster, N. Askeland, E. Maagerø & B. Aamotsbakken (eds.), 35–47. Trondheim: Akademika
. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and can do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Volume I. OECD.
Pisa, I. 2018. Relatorio Brasil no Pisa 2018. MEC, Ministerio da Educacao do Brasil. 〈[URL]〉 (25 June 2020).
Plato. 1961. Dialogues: The Republic. In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (eds.). Electronic Edition. New York, N.Y.: Bollingen Foundation.
Polvinen, M. 2023. Self-Reflective Fiction and 4E Cognition: An Enactive Approach to Literary Artifice. Routledge.
Price, L. 2019. What We Talk About When We Talk About Books: The History and Future of Reading. New York: Basic Books.
Prinz, J. J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Pulvermuller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7): 576–582.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Rabinowitz, P. J. 1987. Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rader, C. M. & Tellegen, A. 1987. An investigation of synesthesia. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 52(5): 981–987.
Radway, J. A. 1984. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2001. On the Socialbility of Reading: Books, Self-fashioning, and the Creation of Communities. Manuscript.
Regel, S., Gunter, T. C. & Friederici, A. D. 2011. Isn’t it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(2): 277–293. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Rieger, D., Reinecke, L., Frischlich, L. & Bente, G. 2014. Media entertainment and well-being: Linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication 64: 456–478.
Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M. A. 2004. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience 21(5): 188–194.
Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 169–192.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. 2001. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(9): 661–670.
Robertsen, S. 2014. Lyst Til å Lese? En Undersøkelse Av Foreningen !les TXt-antologier. Master Thesis. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Rosenblatt, L. M. 1938[1995]. Literature as Exploration. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of The Literary Work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Ross, C. S., McKechnie, L. & Rothbauer, P. M. 2006. Reading Matters: What the Research Reveals about Reading, Libraries, and Community. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Ruas, M. (Trad.). Mukarovsky, J. 1932(1981]. Linguagem-padrao e linguagem-poetica. In Escritos sobre Estetica e Semiotica da Arte, J. Mukarovsky. Lisboa: Editorial Estampa.
Saramago, J. 1999. Entre o narrador omnisciente e o monólogo interior: Deveremos voltar ao autor?/ Entre le narrateur omniscient et le monologue interieur: Faut-Il retourner a l’auteur?. In Comparative Literature Now/ La Littérature Comparée L’Heure Actuelle, S. T. Zepetnek, M. V. Dimic & I. Sywenky, 183–193. Paris: Honoré Champion Editeur.
Sartre, J. P. 1956. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. New York: Philosophical Library.
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M. & Emmorey, K. 2010. Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(11): 2480–2490.
Scholes, R. E. 1998. The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstructing English as a Discipline. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schrijvers, M. 2019. The Story, The Self, The Other: Developing Insight Into Human Nature in the Literature Classroom. PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O. & Rijlaarsdam, G. 2016. The impact of literature education on students’perceptions of self and others: Exploring personal and social learning experiences in relation to teacher approach. Contribution to a special issue The role of writing in literature education, T. Janssen & I. Pieper (eds.) L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature 16, 1–37.
2019a. Gaining insight into human nature: A review of literature classroom intervention studies. Review of Educational Research 89(1): 3–45.
2019b. Toward the validation of a literature classroom intervention to foster adolescents’ insights into human nature: An iterative design process. Contribution to the special issue Systematically designed literature classroom interventions: Design principles, development and implementation, M. Schrijvers, K. Murphy & G. Rijlaarsdam (eds.). L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature.
Schrijvers, M., Janssen, T., Fialho, O., De Maeyer, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. 2019c. Transformative dialogic literature teaching fosters adolescents’ insight into human nature. Learning and Instruction 63, 1–15.
Schulkind, J. 1976. Moments of Being: Unpublished Autobiographical Writings. Virginia Woolf. London: Chatto and Windus for Sussex University Press.
Scott, M. 1999. WordSmith Tools. Version 3. 〈[URL]〉
Seilman, U. & Larsen, S. F. 1989. Personal resonance to literature: A study of remindings while reading. Poetics 18, 165–177.
Šklovsky, V. 1917[1965]. Art as technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Siemens, D. 2010. Numerically Aided Phenomenology: Methodological Developments in an Empirical Investigation of Reader Response. Paper completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course Psychology 498: University of Alberta.
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D. & Miall, D. S. (26–29 Aug, 1998). Enactment Versus Interpretation: A Phenomenological Study of Readers’ Responses to Coleridge’s ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’. Sixth Biannual Conference of the IGEL (International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature). Utrecht: Conference presentation.
2011. Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s the Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5(3): 258–268.
Skjerdingstad, K. I. & Tangerås, T. M. 2019. Shared reading as an affordance-nest for developing kinesic engagement with poetry: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1688631.
Slingerland, E. G. 2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sneath, P. H. & Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman W. H. & Co.
Snyders, G. 1999. Des Élèves Heureux: Réflexion sur la Joie à l’École à Partir de Quelques Texts Littéraires. L’Harmattan.
Sokolowski, R. 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sopčák, P. 2007. ‘Creation from nothing’ – A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses. Language and Literature 16(2): 183–196.
Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J., Swallow, K. & Zacks, J. 2009. Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science 20(8): 989–999.
Spiegelberg, H. & Schuhmann, K. 1982. The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Hague: Nijhoff.
Stockwell, P. 2002[2020]. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
Tellegen, A. & Atkinson, G. 1974. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83(3): 268–277.
Tettamanti, M. E. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Studies 17: 273–281.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F. & Perani, D. 2005. Sentences describing actions activate visuomotor execution and observation systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 273–281.
Thompson, G. & Hunston, S. 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Toolan, M. J. 2008. Verbal Art: Through Repetition to Immersion. Paper presented at the Second International Stylistics Conference. Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China. October 22–25, 2008. Available at: [URL]
2009. Narrative Progression in the Short Story: A Corpus Stylistics Approach [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2010. Emotions in Texts: A Corpus Stylistics Study. PALA 2010 Conference. Conference Presentation. (pp.20–25 July). Genoa: University of Genoa.
Toyne, J. & Usherwood, B. 2001. Checking the Books: The Value and Impact of Public Library Book Reading. Sheffield: Centre for the Public Library and Information in Society, Department of Information Studies.
Troustine, J. R. & Waxler, R. P. 2005. Finding a Voice: The Practice of Changing Lives Through Literature. University of Michigan Press.
Tryon, R. C. 1939. Cluster Analysis: Correlation Profile and Orthometric (Factor) Analysis for the Isolation of Unities of the Mind and Personality. Ann Arbor: Edwards Brothers.
Tsur, R. 1992. What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive: The Poetic Mode of Speech-Perception. Durham: Duke University Press.
2012. Playing by Ear and the Tip of the Tongue: Precategorial information in poetry. [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Dalen-Oskam, K. 2021. Het Raadsel Literatuur: Is Literaire Kwaliteit Meetbaar? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
van Manen, M. 1997. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London: Althouse Press.
van Peer, W. 1986. Stylistics and Psychology: Investigations of Foregrounding. London, Sydney, Wolfeboro: Croom Helm.
van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, F. 2006. Foregrounding. In The Pergamon Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, K. Brown (ed.), Vol. 4: 546–551. Elsevier.
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F. & Zyngier, S. 2012. Scientific Methods for the Humanities. [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Peer, W., Sopcak, P., Castiglione, D., Fialho, O., Jacobs, A. & Hakemulder, F. 2021. Foregrounding. In Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies, D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (eds.), 145–176. Berlin, Boston: DeGruyter.
van Schooten, E., Oostdam, R. & de Glopper, K. 2001. Dimensions and predictors of literary response. Journal of Literacy Research 33(1): 1–32.
Varela, F. J. 1996. Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3: 330–50.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vipond, D. & Hunt, R. A. 1984. Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading. Poetics: International Review for the Theory of Literature 13(3): 261–277.
Votteler, T. 1988. Short Story Criticism: Excerpts from Criticism of the Works of Short Fiction Writers, 1988–1992. Detroit, MI: Gale Research.
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A., Vuust, P., Dohn, A., Roepstorff, A. & Lund, T. 2011. Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. NeuroImage 58(3): 963–973.
Watson, J. B. 1924. Psychology from the Standpoint of a Behaviorist. Philadelphia and London: J. B. Lippincott.
Waxler, R. P. & Troustine, J. R. 1999. Changing Lives through Literature. University of Notre Dame Press.
Weber, M. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch (trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Wild, T. C. & Kuiken, D. 1992. Aesthetic attitude and variations in reported experience of a painting. Empirical Studies of the Arts 10: 57–78.
Wild, T. C., Kuiken, D. & Schopflocher, D. 1995. The role of absorption in experiential involvement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 69(3): 569–579.
Wilhelm, J. 2016. You Gotta BE the Book: Teaching Engaged and Reflective Reading with Adolescents. 3rd ed.. New York, NY: Teachers College.
Winkielman, P., Niedenthal, P. M. & Oberman, L. 2008. The Embodied Emotional Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Winter, E. O. 1974. Replacement as a Function of Repetition: A Study of its Principal Features in the Clause Relations of Contemporary English. PhD dissertation, University of London.
1979. Replacement as a fundamental function of the sentence in context. Forum Linguisticum 4(2): 95–133.
Wirth, W., Hofer, M. & Schramm, H. 2012. Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research 38: 406–428.
Wohl, M. J., Kuiken, D. & Noels, K. A. 2006. Three ways to forgive: A numerically aided phenomenological study. British Journal of Social Psychology 45: 547–561.
Wootton, A. J. 1975. Dilemmas of Discourse: Controversies about the Sociological Interpretation of Language. London: G. Allen & Unwin.
Wordsworth, W. 1798[1963]. Lines Written a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey, On Revisiting the Banks of the Wye During a Tour, July 13, 1798. In Lyrical Ballads: The Text of the 1798 edition with the Additional 1800 Poems and the Prefaces, R. L. Brett & A. R. Jones (eds.). London: Methuen.
Wordsworth, W. & Coleridge, S. T. 1963. Lyrical Ballads: The Text of the 1798 edition with the Additional 1800 Poems and the Prefaces, R. L. Brett & A. R. Jones (eds.) London: Methuen and Co. Ldt.
Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 39: 151–175.
Zimmer, B. 2011. The jargon of the novel, computed. New York Times: Sunday Book Review, 29 July 2011, 〈[URL]〉 (30 July 2011).
Zubin, J. 1938. A technique for measuring like-mindedness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 33(4): 508–516.
Zwaan, R. A. 1994. Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20(4): 920–933.
Zwaan, R. A. & Singer, M. 2003. Text Comprehension. In Handbook of Discourse Processes, E. A. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher & S. R. Goldman (eds.), 83–121. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P. & Graesser, A. C. 1995. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(2): 386–397.
Zyngier, S. 1994a. At the Crosswords of Language and Literature. PhD dissertation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
2008. Macbeth through the computer: Literary evaluation and pedagogical implications. In The Quality of Literature: Linguistic Studies in Literary Evaluation, W. van Peer (ed.), 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
