Cover not available

In:Language in Place: Stylistic perspectives on landscape, place and environment
Edited by Daniela Francesca Virdis, Elisabetta Zurru and Ernestine Lahey
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 37] 2021
► pp. 125–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
(Re)mapping “authentic” London

Iain Sinclair’s London Overground (2015) and the semiotic landscape of London’s East End

 | Anglistisches Seminar, Universität Heidelberg
Published online: 15 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.37.07smi
Abstract
Busse and Warnke’s (2015) Urban Linguistic research paradigm is a seminal and precise answer to recent calls for interdisciplinary investigations of urban space/place that include semiotic and linguistic aspects. The methodological, technical and technological consequences of implementing interdisciplinary urban research, however, are manifold and highly complex. This exploratory case study is an attempt to showcase qualitative analyses of how ‘place-making practices’ (cf. Busse and Warnke 2015) manifest in two urban data types. Ideally, such small-scale investigations need to be complemented and contextualised by further quantitative methods and big data sets, such as the heiURBAN corpus by Busse (cf. e.g., Busse 2020). This chapter combines literary analysis of Iain Sinclair’s London Overground (2015) with descriptions of the semiotic landscape of Shoreditch, one of the most prominent gentrifying/gentrified neighbourhoods in London’s East End. It is embedded into my doctoral research of Shoreditch’s semiotic landscape and the analysis hints at how urban places are situated in discourses of urbanity, gentrification, change, authenticity, and commodification. The scope of this article remains small and exploratory but provides insight into some of the aforementioned methodological issues as well as an outlook of what further investigations may focus on.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical deliberations: Making (urban) places
  • 3.Sinclair’s London
  • 4.The semiotic landscape of Shoreditch
  • 5.Literary place-making in London Overground
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (43)
References
Agha, A. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. 2014. Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change, J. Androutopoulos (ed.), 3–48. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, P. & Schmid, J. E. 2010. Introduction. In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation: Volume 1: Theories and Models. P. Auer & J. E. Schmid (eds), vii–xvi. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berning, N., Schulte, P. & Schwanecke, C. 2014. Experiencing Space – Spacing Experience: Concepts, Practices and Materialities. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Büscher, M. & Urry, J. 2009. Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 99–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busse, B. 2019. Patterns of Discursive Urban Place-Making in Brooklyn, New York. In Corpus Linguistics, Context and Culture, V. Wiegand & M. Mahlberg (eds), 13–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busse, B., Smith, J. & Warnke, I. H. 2020. Declaring Places, Placing Declaratives – An Introduction. In Place Making in the Declarative City, B. Busse, J. Smith & I. H. Warnke, 1–9. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busse, B. & Warnke, I. H. 2015. Sprache im urbanen Raum. In Handbuch Sprache und Wissen, E. Felder & A. Gardt (eds), 519–538. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chayka, K. 2016. Same old, same old: How the hipster aesthetic is taking over the world. theguardian.com, 7 August 2016, < [URL]> (18 October 2017).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (ed.). 2013. The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debord, G. 1955 [2008]. Introduction to a critique of urban geography. In Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings, H. Bauder & S. Engel-Di Mauro (eds), K. Knabb (translator), 23–27. Kelowna: Praxis ePress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elgin, C. 2007. The laboratory of the mind. In A Sense of the World: Essays on Fiction, Narrative and Knowledge, W. Huemer, J. Gibson & L. Pocci (eds), 43–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entrikin, J. N. 1991. The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, J. 2010. Place and place-making in cities: A global perspective. Planning Theory & Practice 11(2): 149–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorter, D. (ed.). 2006. Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, T. & Barrett, H. 2012. Urban Geography. 4th edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. & Thurlow, C. 2010. Introduction. In Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow (eds), 1–40. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. Y. 1997. Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(1): 23–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lees, L., Slater, T. & Wyly, E. K. 2008. Gentrification. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macfarlane, R. 2011. Iain Sinclair’s struggles with the city of London. theguardian.com, 15 July 2011, < [URL]> (18 October 2017).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, N. 2015. Noise, Neoliberalism and the Matter of London. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
No Author. No date. London Overground Film with Iain Sinclair. [URL] (18 October 2017).
Pennycook, A. 2010. Language as a Local Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. & Otsuji, E. 2015. Metrolingualism: Language in the City. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. 2003. Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. Trier: Linguistic Agency, University of Trier.
Shohamy, E. & Gorter, D. 2009. Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. 2011. Ghost Milk. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. London Overground: A Day’s Walk around the Ginger Line. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. Forthcoming. Semiotic Landscapes. In Handbook of Language and Space, B. Busse & I. H. Warnke (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter.
in preparation. Authenti·City: Discursive Urban Place-Making Strategies in Shoreditch, London.
Trinch, S. & Snajdr, E. 2017. What the signs say: Gentrification and the disappearance of capitalism without distinction in Brooklyn. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(1): 64–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuan, Y.-F. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urban Humanities Initiative. No date. Urban Humanities, <[URL]> (18 October 2017).
Westphal, B. 2011. Geocriticism: Real and Fictional Spaces, R. T. Tally Jr (translator). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. The Plausible World: A Geocritical Approach to Space, Place, and Maps, A. Wells (translator). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weston, D. 2015. “Against the Grand Project”: Iain Sinclair’s local London. Contemporary Literature 56(2): 255–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Contemporary Literary Landscapes. The Poetics of Experience. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkens, M. 2015. Digital humanities and its application in the study of literature and culture. Comparative Literature 67(1): 11–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue