Cover not available

In:Style and Reader Response: Minds, media, methods
Edited by Alice Bell, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and David Peplow
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 36] 2021
► pp. 179–196

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
Reading the readers

Ethical and methodological issues for researching readers and reading in the digital age

 | Bournemouth University
Published online: 8 February 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.36.10tho
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background to the study of readers and audiences
  • 3.The impact of the digital
  • 4. Web 2.0 and online participatory cultures
  • 5.Going beyond text
  • 6.Access and anonymity: Negotiating the public versus the private
  • 7.Reflexivity and the responsibilities of researchers
  • 8.Mixed methods approaches
  • 9.Moving from subjects to participants
  • 10.Creative participatory methods
  • 11.Conclusion
  • References
References (43)
References
Barthes, R. 1977. Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives. In Image-Music-Text, S. Heath (ed.), 79–124. London: Fontana. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A., Ensslin, A., Ciccoricco, D., Rustad, H., Laccetti, J. & Pressman, J. 2010. A [S]creed for Digital Fiction. Electronic Book Review <[URL]> (13 March 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bond, C., Ahmed, O. H., Hind, M., Thomas, B. & Hewitt-Taylor, J. 2013. The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(6): e112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Digital Reading Network. 2013–15. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Eberly, R. 2000. Citizen Critics: Literary Public Spheres. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
E-Read. 2016. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Evans, A. & Stasi, M. 2014. Desperately seeking methodology: New directions in fan studies research. Participations 11(2): 4–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiske, J. 1987. Television Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flood, A. 2019. “It has made me want to live”: Public support for lesbian novelist Radclyffe Hall over banned book revealed. The Guardian 10 January 2019 <[URL]> (13 March 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuller, D. & Rehberg Sedo, D. 2012. Mixing it up: Using mixed methods research to invesigate contemporary cultures of reading. In From Codex to Hypertext: Reading at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century, A. Lang (ed.), 234–251. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. “Boring, frustrating, impossible”: Tracing the negative affects of reading from interviews to Story Circles. Participations 16(1): 622–655.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauntlett, D. 2011. Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopolou, A. 2017. “Whose context collapse?”: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context. Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 169–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giaxoglou, K. 2017. Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: Revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation. Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 229–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, S. 1980. Encoding/Decoding. In Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79, S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, P. Willis (eds), 128–39. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, J. 1987. Invisible fictions: Television audiences, paedocracy, pleasure. Textual Practice 1(2): 121–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobson, D. 1991. Soap operas at work. In Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power, E. Seiter, H. Borchers, G. Kreutzner & E-M. Warth (eds), 150–167. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, H. 2006. Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media and Society 8(6): 859–876. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrou, M. 2014. Narratives of trauma re-lived: the ethnographer’s paradox and other tales. In Real Lives, Celebrity Stories: Narratives of Ordinary and Extraordinary People Across Media, B. Thomas & J. Round (eds), 113–128. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landow, G. 1997. Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, A. & boyd, D. 2011 I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse and the imagined audience. New Media and Society 13: 114–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morley, D. 1986. Family Television. London: Comedia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakamura, L. 2013. “Words with friends”: Socially networked reading on Goodreads . PMLA 128(1): 238–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R. 2017. Ethics revisited: Rights, responsibilities and relationships in online research. Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 315–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. & Zappavigna, M. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, R. & Thomas, B. 2011. Introduction. In New Narratives: Stories and Storytelling in the Digital Age, R. Page & B. Thomas (eds), 1–16. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reading Digital Fiction. 2014–17. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Reading Experience Database. 2006-. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Reading on Screen. 2017–18. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Researching Readers Online. 2012. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Spilioti, T. 2017. Media convergence and publicness: Towards a modular and iterative approach to online research ethics. Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 191–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Story Center. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Tagg, C., Lyons, A., Hu, R. & Rock, F. 2017. The ethics of digital ethnography in a team project. Applied Linguistics Review 8(2/3): 271–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Harry Potter Alliance. <[URL]> (13 March 2019).
Thomas, B. 2007. Canons and Fanons: Literary fanfiction online. Dichtung Digital. <[URL]> (19 March 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011a. What is fanfiction and why are people saying such nice things about it? Storyworlds 3: 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011b. Trickster authors and tricky readers on the MZD forums. In Mark Z. Danielewski, J. Bray & A. Gibbons (eds), 86–102. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Fans behaving badly? real person fic and the blurring of the boundaries between the public and the private. In Real Lives, Celebrity Stories: Narratives of Ordinary and Extraordinary People Across Media, B. Thomas & J. Round (eds), 171–185. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, B. & Round, J. 2016. Moderating readers and reading online. Language and Literature 25(3): 239–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, B. 2017. Whose Story is it Anyway? Following Everyday Accounts of Living with Dementia on Social Media. Style 51 (3): 357–373.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whiteman, N. 2007. The establishment, maintenance and destabilisation of fandom: A study of two online communities and an exploration of issues pertaining to internet research . Unpublished PhD Thesis. Institute of Education, London.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue