In:Style and Reader Response: Minds, media, methods
Edited by Alice Bell, Sam Browse, Alison Gibbons and David Peplow
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 36] 2021
► pp. 165–178
Chapter 9
In defence of introspection
Published online: 8 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.36.09sto
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.36.09sto
Article outline
- 1.The problem of observing reading
- 2.The nature of introspection
- 3.Introspecting a poem
- 4. A retrospective on the argument
References
References (53)
Bailey, J. O. 1970. The Poetry of Thomas Hardy: A Handbook and Commentary. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Barsalou, L. W. 2009. Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 364: 1281–1289.
Beenfeldt, C. 2013. The decline and fall of introspectionism. In The Philosophical Background and Scientific Legacy of E. B. Titchener's Psychology: Understanding Introspectionism, C. Beenfeldt (ed.), 47–57. Berlin: Springer.
Carruthers, P. 2009a. How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 121–138.
2011. The opacity of mind: An integrative theory of self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, R. & Simpson, P. 1989. Introduction. In Language, Discourse and Literature, R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds), 1–20. London: Unwin Hyman.
Costall, A. 2006. “Introspectionism” and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition 15(4): 634–654.
Goldman, A. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koriat, A. 2000. The feeling of knowing: some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition 9: 149–171.
Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Schweickert, R. & William, J. M. (eds). 2011. Theory of Mind and Literature. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Macdonald, C. 2014. In my “Mind’s Eye”: Introspectionism, detectivism, and the basis of authoritative self-knowledge. Synthese 15: 1–26.
Overgaard, M., Kauffmann, O. & Ramsøy, T. Z. 2001. Consciousness and introspection. Journal of Consciousness Studies: Consciousness Research Abstract 182.
Ramsøy, T. Z. & Overgaard, M. 2004. Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 1–23.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. 2002. Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin 128(6): 934–960.
Sartre, J.-P. 1957. Being and Nothingness (trans. H. E. Barnes). New York: The Philosophical Library.
Shoemaker, S. 1996. The First-Person Perspective and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stockwell, P. 2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2011. The reader’s paradox. In Current Trends in Pedagogical Stylistics, M. Burke & S. Csábi (eds), 45–57. London: Continuum.
2015. The texture of authorial intention. In World Building: Discourse in the Mind, J. Gavins & E. Lahey (eds), 147–163. London: Bloomsbury.
Stockwell, P. & Mahlberg, M. 2015. Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield
. Language and Literature 24(2): 129–147.
Stockwell, P. & Whiteley, S. (eds). 2014. The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F. & Zyngier, S. 2012. Scientific Methods for the Humanities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N., Fink, G. & Zilles, K. 2001. Mind reading: neural mechanisms of Theory of Mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage 14: 170–181.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Harrison, Chloe
Harrison, Chloe
Mansworth, Megan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
