Cover not available

In:Style, Rhetoric and Creativity in Language: In memory of Walter (Bill) Nash (1926-2015)
Edited by Paul Simpson
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 34] 2019
► pp. 57–76

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
The doubling of design in Walter Nash’s Rhetoric

The Wit of Persuasion

 | Humboldt State University
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.34.05sta
Abstract
This chapter takes as its point of departure a simple diagram which appears at the beginning of Walter Nash’s (1989) Rhetoric: The Wit of Persuasion. As argued, this diagram offers a key to understanding Nash’s unique conception of classical, renaissance and modern rhetoric. Focusing upon the rhetorical canon of taxis/disposition, or arrangement, the chapter explores how Nash celebrates the skill of writers of canonical literary texts, and of canny speakers in everyday situations, to design powerful schemes of persuasion. It is suggested that listeners and readers appreciate the aesthetic realization of language designed to persuade. The author observes how Nash’s approach is to encourage receivers of language actively to take power in rhetorical situations by parodying and rewriting, in order to critically understand and creatively revise these schemes of persuasion. These observations are complemented by an analysis of a press conference held by US President Donald Trump’s first press secretary, Sean Spicer.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Rhetoric, basically defined
  • 3.A complication in the definition, a problem in the theory
  • 4.Power in parody
  • 5.Diagrammatic taxis
  • 6.“And Jim Acosta Joins Us Now”: Diagrammatic taxis at CNN
  • 7.Conclusion: Design within design = “observing ourselves, while acting”
  • References
References (18)
References
Anderson Cooper Transcripts. 2017. Aired 16 March 2017. CNN, 16 March 2017. [URL] (2 March 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. 1961 [1984]. The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, K. 1937 [1984]. Attitudes toward History. 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CNN. 2017. Heated White House Exchange You Need to See. CNN Politics, 16 March 2017. [URL] (2 March 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cockcroft, R. & Cockcroft, S. M. 1992. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. London: MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 2014. How to Read Literature. New Haven, NJ: Yale UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. 2005. Rhetorical stylistics. Language and Literature 14(3): 215–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Forest of Rhetoric. n.d. [URL] (2 March 2018).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haskins, E. 2007. Between archive and participation: Public memory in a digital age. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37(4): 401–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, W. 1989. Rhetoric: The Wit of Persuasion. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. An Uncommon Tongue: The Uses and Resources of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times. 2017a. Citing no evidence, Trump accuses Obama of tapping his phones during the election. Los Angeles Times. 4 March 2017. [URL] (27 March 2019)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. Our dishonest president. Los Angeles Times. 15 July 2017. [URL] (27 March 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phelan, J. 1996. Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pope, R. 1995. Textual Intervention: Critical and Creative Strategies for Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramage, J. D. 2006. Rhetoric: A User’s Guide. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spicer, S. 2017. Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer. The White House, 16 March 2017. [URL] (2 March 2018).
Wardy, R. 2016. Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Statham, Simon
2020. The year’s work in stylistics 2019. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:4 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue