In:Experiencing Fictional Worlds:
Edited by Benedict Neurohr and Lizzie Stewart-Shaw
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 32] 2019
► pp. 157–176
Chapter 9Immersive reading and the unnatural text-worlds of “Dead Fish”
Published online: 21 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.32.09nor
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.32.09nor
Abstract
In this chapter I present a Text World Theory analysis of Adam Marek’s emotionally charged dystopian short story, “Dead Fish”, which takes for its focus a possible future world recovering from environmental disaster. Drawing upon naturalistic reader response data in support of my own introspective analysis, I investigate the estranging experience of reading this particular narrative and discuss the readerly process of interpreting its defamiliarising world-building elements. Analytical focus is placed upon the responses of a purpose-built reading group (comprising four postgraduate research students from the University of Sheffield), who compare their conceptualisation of particular entities within the text-world, and reflect upon their understanding of such entities as “unnatural”. Through a combined application of narratological approaches to unnatural narration (Alber and Heinze 2013) and a Text World Theory perspective (Gavins 2007; Werth 1999), I investigate how readers respond to unnatural narration and draw several connections between readerly immersion and the emotional experience of reading unnatural texts.
Article outline
- 9.1Introduction
- 9.2Unnatural text-worlds and “Dead Fish”
- 9.2.1Conceptualising first-person plural referents
- 9.3Reading unnatural minds
- 9.4An ambiguous and indifferent end
- 9.5Comparing emotional reading experiences of “Dead Fish”
- 9.6Conclusions
Note References
References (51)
Alber, J. 2009. Impossible Storyworlds - and What to Do with Them. StoryWorlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies 1: 79–96.
Alber, J., Iversen, S., Skov Nielsen, H. and Richardson, B. 2010. Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology: Beyond Mimetic Models. Narrative 18(2): 113–136.
2013. What Really Is Unnatural Narratology? StoryWorlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies 5(1): 101–118.
Balloch, A. 2012. The Stone Thrower by Adam Marek. The Skinny, 25 September 2012, <[URL]> (18 September 2016).
1972. “Entfremdung, Verfremdung”: Alienation, Estrangement (trans. A. Halley and D. Suvin). The Drama Review 15(1): 120–125.
Bogdanov, A. 2005. Ostranenie, Kenosis, and Dialogue: The Metaphysics of Formalism According to Shklovsky. The Slavic and East European Journal 49(1): 48–62.
Bühler, K. 1982. The Deictic Field of Language and Deictic Worlds. In Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds), 9–30. Chichester: John Wiley.
Fuller, D. 2008. Reading as Social Practice: The Beyond the Book Research Project. Journal of Popular Narrative Media 1(2): 211–217.
Gerrig, R. J. 1993. Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
Green, K. 1995. Deixis: A Revaluation of Concepts and Categories. In New Essays on Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, K. Green (ed.), 11–27. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Heinze, R. 2008. Violations of Mimetic Epistemology in First-Person Narrative Fiction. Narrative 16(3): 279–297.
Herman, D. 1994. Textual You and Double Deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place
. Style 28(3): 378–411.
2002. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln; London: University of Nebraska Press.
Iversen, S. 2013. Unnatural Minds. In A Poetics of Unnatural Narrative, J. Alber, H. Skov Nielsen and B. Richardson (eds), 94–113. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Kacandes, I. 1993. Are You in the Text?: The “Literary Performative” in Postmodernist Fiction. Text and Performance Quarterly 13: 139–153.
Lahey, E. 2005. Text World Landscapes and English-Canadian National Identity in the Poetry of Al Purdy, Alden Nowlan and Milton Acorn. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
Lee-Houghton, M. 2013. Review of The Stone Thrower by Adam Marek. The New Short Review, <[URL]> (17 December 2016).
2014. How Do You like Your Story Endings, Open or Closed? Adam Marek: Short Story Writer, 18 May 2014, <[URL]> (20 September 2016).
Margolin, U. 1984. Narrative and Indexicality: A Tentative Framework. Journal of Literary Semantics 13: 181–204.
Morris, S. 2012. The Stone Thrower by Adam Marek. The Literateur. 7 October 2012, <[URL]> (21 May 2015).
Peplow, D., Swann, J., Trimarco, P. and Whiteley, S. 2016. The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. New York; London: Routledge.
Phelan, J. 1994. Self-Help for Narratee and Narrative Audience: How “I” and “You”?- Read “How”. Style 28(3): 350–366.
Rapp, D. N. and Gerrig, R. J. 2006. Predilections for Narrative Outcomes: The Impact of Story Contexts and Reader Preferences. Journal of Memory and Language 54(1): 54–67.
Richardson, B. 2002. Beyond Story and Discourse: Narrative Time in Postmodern and Nonmimetic Fiction. In Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Closure and Frames, B. Richardson (ed.), 47–63. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
2006. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
2011. What Is Unnatural Narrative Theory?. In Unnatural Narratives - Unnatural Narratology, J. Alber and R. Heinze (eds), 23–41. Berlin: de Gruyter.
2015. Unnatural Narrative: Theory, History, and Practice. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Shklovsky, V. 1917 [1965]. Art as Technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism, L. T. Lemon and M. J. Reis (trans.), 3–24. Lincoln, NB; London: University of Nebraska Press.
Steen, G. 1991. The Empirical Study of Literary Reading: Methods of Data Collection. Poetics 20: 559–575.
Stockwell, P. 2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Suvin, D. 1979. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics of a Literary Genre. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
Swann, J. and Allington, D. 2009. Reading Groups and the Language of Literary Texts: A Case Study in Social Reading. Language and Literature 18(3): 247–264.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Boucher, Abigail, Marcello Giovanelli, Chloe Harrison, Robbie Love & Caroline Godfrey
Whitt, Richard J
Corbitt, Alex, Jon M. Wargo & Clare O’Connor
Norledge, Jessica
Norledge, Jessica
2021.
Modelling an unethical mind. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 43 ff.
Norledge, Jessica
Norledge, Jessica
Norledge, Jessica
Norledge, Jessica
Norledge, Jessica
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
