In:The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 121–140
Chapter 7The face-value of place-work in William Makepeace Thackeray’s handling of irony
Published online: 25 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.07fro
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.07fro
Abstract
Irony is admittedly a well-established and well-documented feature in William Makepeace Thackeray’s works, but the present contribution undertakes to study its textual mechanisms in light of pragmatic theories complemented with a specific structural approach, referred to as “place-work.” The purpose is to highlight that from the perspectives of both creation and reception, the mechanisms of Thackerayan irony involve the distribution of one, two or three “places,” alternately or cumulatively occupied by the ironist and his addressee(s), whether narrator, commentator, characters, and readers alike. This ever-changing “topology” of irony results in the constant reshuffling of roles and places typically at work in Thackeray’s writings, and underlines as well the structural instability of irony.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Topology of irony: Placework and speaker’s strategy
- 2.1The one-place structure of self-directed irony
- 2.2The two-place structure of irony directed to others
- 2.3The three-place structure of redirected irony
- 3.Topography of irony: Placework and hearer’s reception
- 3.1The one-place structure of interpretation of irony
- 3.2The two-place structure of flagged irony
- 3.3The three-place configuration of sign-posted irony
- 4.Conclusion
Notes References
References (36)
Abrams, Meyer Howard. 1981[1941]. A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brimley, George. 1968[1852]. Henry Esmond. In The Critical Heritage, Geoffrey Tillotson & Donald Hawes (eds), 136–144. London: Routledge.
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987[1978]. Politeness – Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Catalan, Zelma. 2009. The Politics of Irony in Thackeray’s Mature Fiction: Vanity Fair, The History of Henry Esmond, The Newcomes. Sofia: St Kliment Ohridski University Press.
Cuddon, John Anthony. 1977. Dictionary of Literay Terms and Literary Theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Forster, John. 1968[1848]. Review on W. M. Thackeray . In The Critical Heritage, Geoffrey Tillotson & Donald Hawes (eds), 53–61. London: Routledge.
Las Vergnas, Raymond. 1932. W. M. Thackeray. L’homme – le penseur – le romancier. Paris: Honoré Champion.
Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. 2008. Y a-t-il de l’humour dans Alice? Libres Cahiers pour la Psychanalyse 17 : 73–86.
Partington, Alan. 2011. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1786–1800.
Peters, Catherine. 1999. Thackeray, a Writer’s Life. Phoenix Mill, Thrupp, Stroud: Sutton Publishing.
Ray, Gordon (ed.). 1946. The Letters of W. M. Thackeray, Vol. IV. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Searle, John. 1979. The logical status of fictional discourse. In Expression and Meaning, 58–75. Cambridge: CUP.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
