Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 23–40

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Irony in a theory of textual meaning

 | University of Huddersfield, UK
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.02jef
Abstract
This chapter attempts to map out different types of irony, using a model of communication which encompasses a range of potential meaning including linguistic, textual, interpersonal and situational meaning. It is argued that the resulting description of potentially ironic examples can help to show where apparently different types have overlap. It also attempts to demonstrate the boundaries of irony in relation to linguistic humour more generally and to articulate some of the distinctions between irony and other forms of apparent clash such as paradox and hypocrisy. The chapter concludes that irony can occur without intention and despite, not because of, an audience, though both intentionality and addressee(s) are needed for the most recognisable forms of verbal irony.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Textual meaning: The background
  • 3.Typology of the bases of irony
    • 3.1Text vs. text incongruity
    • 3.2Text vs. interpersonal meaning incongruity
    • 3.3Text vs. situational incongruity
    • 3.4Interpersonal vs. interpersonal meaning incongruity
    • 3.5Interpersonal vs. situational meaning incongruity
    • 3.6Situational vs. situational incongruity
  • 4.Irony and other incongruities
  • 5. Dramatic irony
  • 6.Conclusions about irony
  • Notes
  • References
References (20)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6): 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 1999. Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28(4): 523–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. 2014. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1986. On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115(1): 3–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Givoni, Shir, & Fein, Ofer. 2015. Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol 30(4): 290–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1998; 2001. Talk is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Aspects of Language and Learning, Jonathan J. Webster (ed.). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeffries, Lesley. 2007. Textual Construction of the Female Body. Houndmills: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Critical Stylistics. Houndmills: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Critical stylistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, Michael Burke (ed.), 408–420. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Interpretation. In The Handbook of Stylistics, Peter Stockwell & Sara Whiteley (eds), 469–486. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. Critical stylistics. In The Continuum Companion to Stylistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.), 157–176. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Textual meaning and its place in a theory of language. Topics in Linguistics 15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Short, Michael. 2007. Style in Fiction. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, Walter. 1985. The Language of Humour. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the Discourse of Satire. Towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humour [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid!” Towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210], Marta Dynel (ed.), 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Pattison, Steven
2025.  A Possible Worlds Theory Account of Dramatic Irony in Fawlty Towers : A Touch of Class and The Builders . Metaphor and Symbol 40:2 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Chambers, Faye
2023. Unifying the Humour Theories: A Stylistic Approach. In Humour Theory and Stylistic Enquiry, ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue