Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter
Edited by Manuel Jobert and Sandrine Sorlin
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 30] 2018
► pp. 3–21

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Introduction

The intricacies of irony and banter

 | University of Lyon 3, CREA Paris-Nanterre, France
 | Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA-IUF, Aix-en-Provence, France
Published online: 25 April 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.30.01job
Abstract
This introductory chapter starts with a brief presentation of what triggered our interest in the joint study of irony and banter. We then delve into the theoretical intricacies of these two discursive practices. We review the major theoretical frameworks that have contributed to our understanding of these practices and pinpoint some crucial issues. We conclude with an overview of the different viewpoints expressed and adopted in the following chapters.
Article outline
  • 1.Origins and objectives
  • 2.What is an ironical utterance?
    • 2.1Beyond the classical trope
    • 2.2Subcategories
  • 3.Competing theories
  • 4.Defining banter
    • 4.1A cultural approach
    • 4.2Linguistic approaches to banter
  • 5.Book contents
  • Notes
  • References
References (65)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000a. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. RASK: Internationalt Tidsskrift for Sprogog Kommunikation 12: 3–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbe, Katharina. 1993. Isn’t it ironic that…? Explicit irony markers. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 578–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Irony in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, Elizabeth. 2006. Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 1974. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian. 1990. Listening to Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Gerrig, Richard. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert & O’Brien, Jennifer. 2000. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert L. 2007. Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 319–338. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David & Quirk, Randolph. 1964. Systems of Prosodic and Paralinguistic Features in English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Kaplan, Joan & Winner, Ellen. 2007. Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 297–317. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les Echelles argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Ironie et négation. In Ironie et un peu plus. Hommage à Oswald Ducrot pour son 80ème anniversaire, Vahram Atayan & Ursula Wienen (eds), 169–179. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2008. No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(2): 241–261 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2011. The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 210]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics 10: 403–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor 27(4): 619–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Pejoration via sarcastic irony and sarcasm. In Pejoration [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 228], Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer & Heike Wiese (eds), 219–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontanier, Pierre. 1830[1977]. Les figures du discours. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Kate. 2004. Watching the English. The Hidden Rule of English Behaviour. London: Hodder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1995. On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Discourse coherence and the theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately? In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 19–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 1999. On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–1618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel, Fein, Ofer, Laadan, Dafna, Wolfson, Jon, Zeituny, Michal, Kidrons, Ran, Kaufman, Ronnie & Shaham, Ronit. 2007. Expecting irony: Context vs. salience-based effects. Metaphor and Symbol 22(2): 119–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2(2): 159–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Young, Randall C., Heery, Erin A., Oeming, Carmen & Monarch, Natalie D. 1998. Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(5): 1231–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Capps, Lisa, Kring, Ann M., Young, Randall C. & Heerey, Erin A. 2001. Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 127(2): 229–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1980. L’ironie comme trope. Poétique 41: 108–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J. & Glucksberg, Sam. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 112–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, Long, Debra & Church, Mary. 1991. On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6: 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Glucksberg, Sam & Brown, Mary. 2007. How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. In Irony in Language and Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader, Raymond W. Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds), 57–95. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Guern, Michel. 1975. Eléments pour une histoire de la notion d’ironie. Linguistique et Semiology 2: 47–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, Bill. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 157–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacInnes, Paul. 2011. The Art of Banter: ‘It’s like a boxing match. It can be bruising’. The Guardian, Tuesday 8 November.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morini, Massimiliano. 2010. The poetics of disengagement: Jane Austen and echoic irony. Language and Literature 19(4): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Irony. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Styistics, Violeta Sotirova (ed.), 553–566. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muecke, Douglas C. 1970. Irony. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peleg, Orna, Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 2008. Resisting contextual information: You can’t put a salient meaning down. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4: 13–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. 1954. Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shelley, Cameron. 2001. The bicoherence theory of situational irony. Cognitive Science 25: 775–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2011. “That’s not ironic, that’s just stupid.” Towards an eclectic account of the discourse of irony. In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, Marta Dynel (ed.), 33–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seto, Ken-ichi. 1998. On non-echoic irony. In Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 37], Robyn Carston & Seiji Uchida (eds), 240–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 295–318. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toplak, Mary & Katz, Albert. 2000. On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467–1488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utsumi, Akira. 2000. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Overbeke, Maurits. 2004. Quand rire, c’est “faire rire aux dépens”. Notes sur l’ironie. In Seduction, Community, Speech [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 127], Frank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis & Bart Vandenabeele (eds), 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo and pretence? Lingua 116: 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 59: 40–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sorlin, Sandrine & Tuija Virtanen
2024. A pragmatic model of hypocrisy. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue