Cover not available

In:The Stylistics of Landscapes, the Landscapes of Stylistics
Edited by John Douthwaite, Daniela Francesca Virdis and Elisabetta Zurru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 28] 2017
► pp. 61–80

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 5
The blind tour

Spatial abstraction in experimental fiction

Published online: 7 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.28.05ber
Abstract
On the one hand, this chapter contributes to recent efforts in narrative theory which aim at specifying the cognitive and interpretive challenge of experimental fiction. On the other hand, it focuses on the unconventional textualisation of space in narrative. Drawing on stylistics and narrative theory, it analyses spatial abstraction as an effect of stylistic features in Orchis Militaris, an experimental narrative by Ivo Michiels. The motif of blindness is prominent in the novel and will be directly linked to the reader’s processing attempts. In that respect, it echoes the analogy of blindness used by Catherine Emmott (1997) to refer to the experience of a reader who is monitoring fictional contexts. The reader of Orchis Militaris is like a blind person, but one who is not provided with sufficient clues to construct the contextual configuration of the people and settings around him or her. Particular attention will be paid to the stylistic features of spatial abstraction, the cognitive demands made on readers and the interpretive opportunities emerging from their cognitive disorientation.
Article outline
  • 1.Narrative space, final frontiers
  • 2.The blind tour and the mental representation of locations
  • 3.An experiment in the textualisation of space
    • 3.1Thematisation and description
    • 3.2Monitoring contextual configurations
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Alber, J. 2009. Impossible storyworlds – and what to do with them. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Study 1(1): 79–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alber, J., Iversen, S., Nielsen, H. S. & Richardson, B. 2010. Unnatural narratives, unnatural narratology: Beyond mimetic models. Narrative 18(2): 113–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1994[1957]. The Poetics of Space: The Classic Look at How We Experience Intimate Places. Boston MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. Notes toward a historical poetics. In The Dialogic Imagination, C. Emerson & M. Holquist (trans.), 84–258. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaerts, L. 2012. Alfa, Cobra, Zero: Abstractie, abstracte kunst en De alfa-cyclus . In Ivo Michiels Intermediaal, L. Bernaerts, H. Vandevoorde & B. Vervaeck (eds), 45–59. Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caracciolo, M. 2013. Blind reading: Toward an enactivist theory of the reader’s imagination. In Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, L. Bernaerts, D. De Geest, L. Herman & B. Vervaeck, 81–105. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casanova, P. 1997. Beckett l’Abstracteur: Anatomie d’une Révolution Littéraire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A. & Hewitt, L. E. (eds). 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmott, C. 1997. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J. & Alexander, M. 2013. Rhetorical control of readers’ attention: Psychological and stylistic perspectives on foreground and background in narrative. In Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, L. Bernaerts, D. De Geest, L. Herman & B. Vervaeck (eds.), 39–57. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1972. Figures III. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, K. (ed.) 1995. New Essays in Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, D. 2002. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. 2003. Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M. 2007[1981]. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michiels, I. 1979. Book Alpha and Orchis Militaris , A. Dixon (trans.). Boston MA: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabinovitz, R. 1977. Time, space and verisimilitude in Samuel Beckett’s fiction. Journal of Beckett Studies 2: 40–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, B. 2006. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Unnatural Narrative. Theory, History, and Practice. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. 1983. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Methuen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronen, R. 1986. Space in fiction. Poetics Today 7(3): 421–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Possible Worlds in Literary Theory. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryan, M. -L. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Bloomington IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Space. In The Living Handbook Of Narratology, P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid & J. Schönert (eds). Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. <[URL]> (15 April 2011).
Semino, E. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B. 1996. Spatial perspective in descriptions. In Language and Space, P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (eds), 463–491. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zoran, G. 1984. Towards a theory of space in fiction. Poetics Today 5(2): 309–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Polvinen, Merja
2025. Gender, Narrative, and Enactive Cognition. In The Palgrave Handbook of Feminist, Queer and Trans* Narrative Studies, ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue