In:Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 199–215
Chapter 10Elaboration, emotion, and transportation
Implications for conceptual analysis and textual features
Published online: 9 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.11dix
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.11dix
Abstract
A central component of absorption is the compelling metaphor of “transportation into the story world.” Here, we considered four variables related to transportation and absorption more generally: evoked realism, emotional response, and personal memories as well as transportation. We collected data on these variables from a large crowd-sourced survey of readers’ reactions to their most recently read novel. To provide insight into the causal relations among these variables, we identified the best-fitting structural equation model for these data. The model indicated that transportation was a function of emotional responses, and emotional responses were a function of both evoked realism and personal memories. This analysis was interpreted in terms of the cognitive process of story world elaboration.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Components of absorption
- 2.1Transportation
- 2.2Evoked realism
- 2.3Emotional responses
- 2.4Personal memories
- 3.Evidence on functional relations
- 4.Method
- 4.1Materials
- 4.2Respondents
- 4.3Analysis
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1The role of elaboration
- 6.2Textual features for absorption
- 6.3Concluding remarks
References
References (32)
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2015). Transport: Challenges to the metaphor. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280.
CrowdFlower, Inc. (n.d.). CrowdFlower. [Web page]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cupchik, G., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpt from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25, 363–377.
Fish, S. (1988). Interpreting the varorium. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 319–329). New York, NY: Longman.
Graaf, A. de, Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, H. (2009). The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications, 34(4), 385–405. .
Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C., Olde, B., White, K., & Person, N. K. (1999). Who knows what? Propagation of knowledge among agents in a literary story world. Poetics, 26(3), 143–175.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–95.
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–21.
(2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–342). Hove: Psychology Press.
Griffiths, P. E. (1997). What emotions really are: The problem of psychological categories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Iser, W. (1988). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 212–228). New York, NY: Longman.
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.
Oatley, K. (2002). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Palencik, J. T. (2008). Emotions and the force of fiction. Philosophy and Literature, 32(2), 258–277.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing [Web page]. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
Scarry, E. (1995). On vivacity: The difference between daydreaming and imagining-under-authorial instruction. Representations, 52, 1–26.
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications (Ch.1). Washinton, DC: American Psychological Association.
Van Peer, W. (1997). Toward a poetics of emotion. In M. Hjort & S. Laver (Eds.), Emotion and the arts (pp. 215–24). Oxford: OUP.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
de Graaf, Anneke
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
