Cover not available

In:Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 177–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption in literature and film

 | Tilburg University
 | Utrecht University
 | University of Amsterdam
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.10bal
Abstract
The present study was to further the understanding of the conceptual relationship between narrative absorption, that is the intense engagement with a story world, and felt suspense, that is the anticipation of a narrative outcome event. To this end, a media comparative online experiment was conducted with a 2 (Media format: film vs. literature) × 2 (Suspense structure: diegetic vs. non-diegetic delay) × 2 (Stories) between subject design. Results revealed a complex relationship among felt suspense, attention, emotional engagement, and transportation, showing the high importance of attention in felt suspense, and the moderating effect of media format and gender. Findings indicate that non-diegetic suspense delay unlike diegetic suspense decreases felt suspense and narrative absorption independently of media format.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Narrative suspense structures
    • 1.2Felt suspense and narrative absorption
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Design and procedure
    • 2.2Participants
    • 2.3Stimulus material
    • 2.4Measures
      • Suspense Scale
      • Story world Absorption Scale
      • Aesthetic Appreciation
      • Attention check
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Relation between suspense and absorption
    • 4.2The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption
    • 4.3The effect of media format on felt suspense and narrative absorption
    • 4.4Limitations and recommendations
    • 4.5Suggestions for further research
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (44)
References
Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015). The Transportation Scale – Short Form (TS – SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armbrust, T. (Producer) & Reeves, M. (2010). Let me in [Motion Picture]. Beverly Hills, CA: Overture Films.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bálint, K., & Tan, E. S. (2015). “It feels like there are hooks inside my chest”: The construction of narrative absorption experiences using image schemata. Projections, 9(2), 63–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezdek, M. A. (2012). Changes in attentional focus during suspenseful film viewing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezdek, M. A., & Gerrig, R. J. (2016). When narrative transportation narrows attention: Changes in attentional focus during suspenseful film viewing. Media Psychology, 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezdek, M., Gerrig, R., Wenzel, W., Shin, J., Revill, K. P., Schumacher, E. (2015). Neural evidence that suspense narrows attentional focus. Neuroscience, 303: 338–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5), 473–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Ohtsuka, K. (1988). Story structure, characterization, just world organization, and reader affect in American and Hungarian short stories. Poetics, 17(4), 395–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butan, M. (Producer) & Hillcoat, J. (Director). (2007). The Road [Motion Picture]. New York, NY: Dimension Films.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatman, S. B. (1980). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comisky, P., & Bryant, J. (1982). Factors involved in generating suspense. Human Communication Research, 9, 49–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doicaru, M. M. (2016). Gripped by movies. From story-world to artifact absorption. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenstein, S. (1977). Film form: Essays in film theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: A Harvest/HBJ Book Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falcsik, M. (2013). Húszévesen. In Változatok a szabadságra. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geiger, S., & Reeves, B. (1993). The effects of scene changes and semantic relatedness on attention to television. Communication Research, 20(2), 155–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Bernardo, A. B. (1994). Readers as problem-solvers in the experience of suspense. Poetics, 22(6), 459–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graaf, A. de, & Hustinx, L. (2011). The effect of story structure on emotion, transportation, and persuasion. Information Design Journal, 19, 142–154. Retrieved from: [URL]
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeken, H., & Van Vliet, M. (2000). Suspense, curiosity, and surprise: How discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story. Poetics, 27(4), 277–286. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Kinnebrock, S. & Bilandzic, H. (2006. June). How to make a story work: Introducing the concept of narrativity into narrative persuasion. Paper presented at the 56th yearly International Communication Association Conference , Dresden, Germany. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A. M., & Hastall, M. (2004). Affective news effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31(3), 259–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C. (2006). Mystery appeal: Effects of uncertainty and resolution on the enjoyment of mystery. Media Psychology, 8(3), 193–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kron, A., Schul, Y., Cohen, A., Hassin, R. R. (2010). Feelings don’t come easy: Studies on the effortful nature of feelings. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 139, 520–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories. Effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Doicaru, M. M., Tan, E. S. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure storyworld absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lang, A., Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J. (1993). The effects of related and unrelated cuts on television viewers’ attention, processing capacity, and memory. Communication Research, 20(1), 4–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindquist, A. (2007). Let the right one in. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, C. (2006). The Road. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moyer-Guse, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, M. B., Sargent, S. L., & James III, B. (1998). The impact of sex and gender role self-perception on affective reactions to different types of film. Sex Roles, 38(1–2), 45–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pramaggiore, M., & Wallis, T. (2005). Film: a critical introduction. London: Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raz, G., Jacob, Y., Gonen, T., Winetraub, Y., Flash, T., Soreq, E., & Hendler, T. (2014). Cry for her or cry with her: context-dependent dissociation of two modes of cinematic empathy reflected in network cohesion dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 30–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, E. S., & Diteweg, G. (1996). Suspense, predictive inference, and emotion. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen, Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 149–188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillman, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, W. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wied, M. de (1991). The role of time structures in the experience of film suspense and duration. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The role of temporal expectancies in the production of film suspense. Poetics, 23(1), 107–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Bentz, Maria, Maya Cortez Espinoza, Vesela Simeonova, Tilmann Köppe & Edgar Onea
2024. Measuring Suspense in Real Time: A New Experimental Methodology. Scientific Study of Literature 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ghasseminejad, Melina & María-Ángeles Martínez
2024. Secondary storyworld possible selves: narrative response and cultural (un)predictability. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 10:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Gulyas, Napsugar, Miruna Doicaru, Wilco Boode, Fabio Campos & Marnix S. van Gisbergen
2024. ‘What Are They Looking at?’ Testing the Capacity of Action Units to Direct Attention in a 360° Recorded Virtual Reality Narrative. In XR and Metaverse [Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, ], ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Mathiesen, Signe Lund, Stephen C. Van Hedger, Vanessa C. Irsik, Matthew M. Bain, Ingrid S. Johnsrude & Björn Herrmann
2024. Exploring Age Differences in Absorption and Enjoyment during Story Listening. Psychology International 6:2 ► pp. 667 ff. DOI logo
Tosi, Giorgia, Noemi Bonali & Daniele Romano
2024. Finding oneself in someone else’s shoes: The role of perspective in literary texts. Consciousness and Cognition 125 ► pp. 103767 ff. DOI logo
Hiskes, Ben, Milo Hicks, Samuel Evola, Cameron Kincaid & Fritz Breithaupt
2023. Multiversionality: Considering multiple possibilities in the processing of narratives. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14:3 ► pp. 1099 ff. DOI logo
Ready, Jonathan L.
2023. Immersion, Identification, and the Iliad, DOI logo
Bente, Gary, Kevin Kryston, Nolan T. Jahn & Ralf Schmälzle
2022. Building blocks of suspense: subjective and physiological effects of narrative content and film music. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1 DOI logo
Klenner, Niels & Tilmann Köppe
2021. On the alethic and moral status of political storytelling. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 7:1 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021. Exploring the dimensional relationships of story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature 11:2 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Bálint, Katalin E.
2020. Suspense. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue