In:Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 119–131
Chapter 6“Spellbound in darkness”
Narrative absorption discussed by film theory
Published online: 9 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.07kes
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.07kes
Abstract
This contribution discusses various strands in classical and modern film theory that have tried to conceptualize the phenomenon of absorption. In the 1910’s already, several authors described the specific state the film spectator is in with a dream. This metaphor has been taken up in a variety of ways, from the often-used designation of Hollywood as a “dream factory” to psychoanalytical film theory in the 1970’s. The so-called cinematic apparatus – the darkened hall, the projector and the positioning of the spectator – was seen as a crucial element in producing this dream-like state, as was the specific impression of reality that filmic images produce. This strand is manifest in the French Filmology movement, in early semiotic film theory and, again, in psychoanalytical film theory. The article also discusses alternative accounts for the phenomenon of absorption such as the semio-paragmatic concept of “fictionalisation” or the more recently used concept of “immersion”.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The paradoxical dreamer
- 3.The impression of reality
- 4.Fictionalisation
- 5.Immersion
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (28)
Baudry, J. L. (1986a). Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, ideology, apparatus (pp. 286–298). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
(1986b). The apparatus: Metapsychological approaches to the impression of reality in the cinema. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, ideology, apparatus (pp. 299–318). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Bordwell, D. (1989). A case for cognitivism. Iris, 9, 11–40. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Carroll, N. (1988). Mystifying movies. Fads and fallacies in contemporary film theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Döblin, A. (2004). The theatre of the little people. In R. W. McCormick & A. Guenther-Pal (Eds.), German essays on film (pp. 1–3). London: Continuum.
Fielding, R. (1983). Hale’s tours: Ultrarealism in the pre-1910 motion picture. In J. Fell (Ed.), Film before Griffith (pp. 116–130). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Grodal, T. (1997). Moving pictures. A new theory of film genres, feelings, and cognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hofmannsthal, H. von (2004). The substitute for dreams. In R. W. McCormick & Guenther-Pal, A. (Eds.), German essays on film (pp. 53–56). London: Continuum.
Huhtamo, E. (1995). Encapsulated bodies in motion. Simulators and the quest for total immersion. In S. Penny (Ed.), Critical Issues in Electronic Media (pp. 159–186), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Kessler, F. (2007). Notes on dispositif
. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Metz, C. (1974). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1976). The fiction film and its spectator: A metapsychological study. New Literary History, 8(1), 75–105.
Michotte van den Berck, A. (1948). Le caractère de “réalité” des projections cinématographiques. Revue Internationalel de Filmologie, 1(3–4), 249–261.
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck. The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Odin, R. (1984). Film documentaire, lecture documentarisante. In J. C. Lyant & R. Odin (Eds.), Cinémas et réalités (pp. 263–278). Saint-Étienne: CIEREC.
(1989). A semiopragmatic approach of the documentary. In W. De Greef & W. Hessling (Eds.), Image, reality, spectator (pp. 91–100), Leuven: Acco.
(2011). Les espaces de communication. Introduction à la sémio-pragmatique. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Rabinovitz, L. (1998). From Hale’s Tours to Star Tours: Virtual voyages and the delirium of the hyper-real. Iris, 25, 133–152.
Riniéri, J. J. (1953). L’impression de réalité au cinéma; les phénomènes de croyance. In E. Souriau (Ed.), L’univers filmique (pp. 233–45). Paris: Flammarion.
Ryan, M. L. (2001). Narrative as virtual reality. Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Sobchack, V. (1992). The address of the eye: A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(2004). Carnal thoughts. Embodiment and moving image culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Voss, C. (2011). Film experience and the formation of illusion: The spectator as ‘surrogate body’ for the cinema. Cinema Journal 50(4), 136–150.
Wulff, H. J. (2003). Empathie als Dimension des Filmverstehens. Ein Thesenpapier. Montage AV, 12(1), 136–161. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.