Cover not available

In:Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 97–118

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 5
Into film

Does absorption in a movie’s story world pose a paradox?

 | University of Amsterdam | University of Copenhagen
 | University of Amsterdam
 | Utrecht University
 | Utrecht University | University of Augsburg
 | Utrecht University
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.06tan
Abstract
Most film viewers know the experience of being deeply absorbed in the story of a popular film. It seems that at such moments they lose awareness of watching a movie. And yet it is highly unlikely that they completely ignore the fact that they watch a narrative and technological construction. Perhaps film viewers experience being in a story world while simultaneously being aware of its construction. Such a dual awareness would seem paradoxical, because the experience of the one would go at the cost of the other. We argue that the solution of this paradox requires dropping the notion of an undivided consciousness, and replacing it with one of consciousness as coming in degrees. In this chapter we present both cognitive and film-analytic arguments for differential awareness of story and narration/technology, and argue that a characteristic of absorption is to be found in story world super-consciousness.
Article outline
  • 1.The problem: Dual awareness
  • 2.Consciousness and the experience of film stories
    • 2.1Consciousness and the unitary experience
    • 2.2Degrees of consciousness and dual awareness
  • 3.Why narrative structure escapes consciousness
  • 4.Why story world events occupy consciousness
    • 4.1Interesting events
    • 4.2Development of anticipations
  • 5.How unseen film technology enhances story world experiences
  • 6.A solution: Unitary experience in absorbed film viewing
  • 7.Absorption is a supervised staging of the story world
  • 8.Limitations
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (68)
References
Allen, R. (1993). Representation, illusion, and the cinema. Cinema Journal, 32(2), 21–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (Vol. 8, pp. 29–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Augustin, D., & Leder, H. (2006). Art expertise: A study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science, 48(2), 135–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theater of consciousness: The workspace of the mind. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The conscious access hypothesis: Origins and recent evidence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(1), 47–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bálint, K., & Tan, E. S. H. (2015). “It feels like there are hooks inside my chest”. The construction of narrative absorption experiences using image schemata. Projections, 9, 63–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezdek, M. A., Gerrig, R. J., Wenzel, W. G., Shin, J., Revill, K. P., & Schumacher, E. H. (2015). Neural evidence that suspense narrows attentional focus. Neuroscience, 303, 338–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(02), 227–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5–6), 481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordwell, D. (1985). Widescreen aesthetics and mise en scene criticism. The Velvet Light Trap, 21, 18. Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2002). Intensified continuity visual style in contemporary American film. Film Quarterly, 55(3), 16–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The way Hollywood tells it: Story and style in modern movies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style & mode of production to 1960. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2016). Film art. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, E. (1992). Narrative comprehension and film. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, J. M. (1980). Toward a structural psychology of cinema. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, N., & Seeley, W. P. (2013). Cognitivism, psychology and neuroscience: Movies as attentional engines. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics (pp. 53–75). Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohn, N. (2013). Visual narrative structure. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 413–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., Jackendoff, R., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). (Pea) nuts and bolts of visual narrative: Structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, J. E. (2016). Narrative theory and the dynamics of popular movies. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(6), 1713–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Gardelle, V., & Kouider, S. (2009). Cognitive theories of consciousness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness, 1, 135–146. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. Changeux, J. -P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 204–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doicaru, M. M. (2016). Gripped by movies. From story-world to artifact absorption. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S., & Huff, M. (2009). Canonical views of dynamic scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 17–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K. (2009). Simulated worlds: Transportation into narratives. In K. D. Markman & W. M. P. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 241–256). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodal, T. (2009). Embodied visions. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2003). Intersubject synchronization of cortical vision during natural vision. Science, 303, 1634–1640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinde, S. J. (2016). Attention while watching movies. The study of attention while engaged in the prolonged activity of watching movies. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of BristolGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. (2006). Seeing red. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M., & He, S. (2006). A gender-and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(45), 17048–17052. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice & Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S. H. & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambie, J. A., & Marcel, A. J. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: a theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109(2), 219–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamme, V. A. (2010). How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(3), 204–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewinski, P., Fransen, M. L., & Tan, E. S. (2014). Predicting advertising effectiveness by facial expressions in response to amusing persuasive stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 7(1), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loschky, L. C., Larson, A. M., Magliano, J. P., & Smith, T. J. (2015). What would Jaws do? The tyranny of film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level narrative film comprehension. PloS One 10(11), e0142474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 199–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, G. (1998). Consciousness and mind as philosophical problems and as psychological issues. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century’s end (pp. 45–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGovern, K., & Baars, B. J. (2007). Cognitive theories of consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 177–205). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metz, C. (1974). On the impression of reality in the cinema. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, 3–15. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michotte van den Berck, A. (1948). Le caractère de ‘réalité’ des projections cinématographiques. Revue Internationale de Filmologie, 1, 249–261. [Translation by A. P. Costall, as The character of ‘reality’ of cinematographic projections. In G. Thines, Costall, A. P., & Butterworth, G (Eds.), 1991, Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 197–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawarence Erlbaum Associates].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology 3(2), 101–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Narrative consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 375–402). Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2014). Event cognition. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raz, G., Jacob, Y., Gonen, T., Winetraub, Y., Flash, T., Soreq, E., & Hendler, T. (2014). Cry for her or cry with her: Context-dependent dissociation of two modes of cinematic empathy reflected in network cohesion dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 30–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 211–236). New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12(3), 273–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwann, S., Garsoffky, B., & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences? Memory & Cognition, 28, 214–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2012). Triangulating aesthetic experience. In A. P. Shimamura & S. E. Palmer (Eds.), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience, (pp. 80–106). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, T. J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2) 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, T. J., Levin, D. T. & Cutting, J. (2012). A window on reality: Perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 101–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suckfüll, M., & Scharkow, M. (2009). Modes of reception for fictional films. Communications, 34(4), 361–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, E. S. H. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Film induced affect as a witness emotion. Poetics, 23, 7–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, K. (1999). Storytelling in the new Hollywood: understanding classical narrative technique. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visch, V., & Tan, E. S. H. (2009). Categorizing moving objects into film genres: The effect of animacy attribution, emotional response, and the deviation from non-fiction. Cognition, 110, 265–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visch, V. T., Tan, E. S. H., & Saakes, D. P. (2015). Viewer knowledge: Application of exposure-based layperson knowledge in genre-specific animation production. International Journal of Design, 9(1), 83–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winston, A., & Cupchik, G. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18(1), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zacks, J. M. (2013). Constructing event representations during film comprehension. In A. P. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics (pp. 227–243). Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillmann, D. (2005). Cinematic creation of emotion. In J. D. Anderson & B. F. Fisher Anderson (Eds.), Moving image theory (pp. 164–179). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Gulyas, Napsugar, Miruna Doicaru, Wilco Boode, Fabio Campos & Marnix S. van Gisbergen
2024. ‘What Are They Looking at?’ Testing the Capacity of Action Units to Direct Attention in a 360° Recorded Virtual Reality Narrative. In XR and Metaverse [Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, ], ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Ready, Jonathan L.
2023. Immersion, Identification, and the Iliad, DOI logo
Cutting, James E.
2021. Movies on Our Minds, DOI logo
Polvinen, Merja, Howard Sklar & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. Mimetic and synthetic views of characters: How readers process “people” in fiction. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1687257 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Tan, Eduard Sioe-Hao & Valentijn Visch
2018. Co-Imagination of Fictional Worlds in Film Viewing. Review of General Psychology 22:2 ► pp. 230 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue