In:Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 29–47
Chapter 2Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences
Published online: 9 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.03kui
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.03kui
Abstract
When reading literary narratives, we assume that readers can get absorbed in the story world and in the story’s artifice. Since most absorption research focuses primarily on popular media, virtually no attention has been paid to the possibility that literary devices such as deviation could elicit absorption experiences or that absorption could be aesthetic in nature. This chapter takes an interdisciplinary approach combining insights from media psychology, literary studies, and aesthetics to present a theoretical framework for two different varieties of narrative aesthetic absorption during reading: story world absorption and artifact absorption. We propose that these varieties mirror the distinction made by narratologists between story and discourse and the distinction made by emotion psychologists between F and A emotions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Absorption research taxonomy
- 2.1Story world absorption
- 3.There is more to a narrative than story world
- 3.1Foregrounding and absorption
- 3.2Empirical studies on the relationship between absorption and foregrounding
- 3.3Introducing artifact absorption
- 4.Towards a new understanding of narrative aesthetic absorption
- 4.1“Weaving in and out” of narrative aesthetic absorption
- 5.Discussion
Note References
References (67)
Appel, M. (2008). Fictional narratives cultivate just world beliefs. Journal of Communication, 58, 62–81.
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13, 101–135.
Bálint, K. (2013, March). Exploratory study on the subjective experience of absorption. Paper presented at the Lost in Story Worlds Symposium, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Bálint, K. & Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Doicaru, M. M. (2016). Reconceptualizing foregrounding: Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2).
Bálint, K., & Tan, E. S. (2015). “It feels like there are hooks inside my chest”: The construction of narrative absorption experiences using image schemata. Projections, 9(2), 63–88.
Bell, C. (1982). The aesthetic hypothesis. In Chatto & Windus (Eds.), Modern art and modernism: A critical anthology (pp. 3–30). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279–286.
Biocca, F. (2002). The evolution of interactive media: Toward “being there” in nonlinear narrative worlds. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 97–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Braun, I. K., & Cupchik, G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109.
Brecht, B. (1964). A short organum for the theatre. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, 179–205.
Bullough, E. (1912). ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and as an aesthetic principle. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 87–98.
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280.
Chatman, S. B. (1980). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Cambridge: CUP.
Cupchik, G. C. (1994). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23(1), 177–188.
Doicaru, M. M. (2016). Gripped by movies. From story-world to artifact absorption. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Gawronski, B. (2009). Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 141.
Genette, G. (1988). Narrative Discourse Revisited. (Jane E. Lewin, trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Green, M. C. (2005). Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for the self. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 53–75). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327.
Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539.
Hager, M., Hagemann, D., Danner, D., & Schankin, A. (2012). Assessing aesthetic appreciation of visual artworks – The construction of the art reception survey (ARS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 320.
Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218.
Hakemulder, F. (2013). Travel experiences: A typology of transportation and other absorption states in relation to types of aesthetic responses. In J. Ludtke (Ed.), Wie gebannt: Aesthetische Verfahren der affektiven Bildung von Aufmerksamkeit (pp. 163–182). Berlin: Freie Universitaet.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385.
Hoyle, R. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and applications. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrott & A. M. Jacobs (Eds), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–524). München: Carl Hanser.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kinnebrock, S., & Bilandzic, H. (2006). How to make a story work: Introducing the concept of narrativity into narrative persuasion. Presented at the International Communication Association Conference in Dresden.
Koopman, E. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62–79.
Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories. The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Utrecht University.
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S. H., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122.
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopcak, P. (2012). The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 243–272.
Larsson, S. (2008). The girl with the dragon tattoo: Millennium I (R. Keeland, Trans.) London: MacLehose Press (original work published in 2005).
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Mukarovsky, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oatley, K. (1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5–6), 439–454.
Oliver, M. B. and Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81.
Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(1), 29.
Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning. Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 161–182.
Ravaja, N. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193–235.
Roche, S. M., & McConkey, K. M. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 91–101.
Ryan, M. L. (2001). Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scheff, T. J. (1979). Catharsis in healing, ritual, and drama. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Segal, E. M. (1995). A cognitive-phenomenological theory of fictional narrative. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 61–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds. & Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment – education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191.
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418.
Tan, E. S. H. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268.
Van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, F. (2006). Foregrounding. In Keith Brown (ed.), The Pergamon encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 546–551). Oxford: Elsevier.
Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213.
Wolf, W. (2004). Aesthetic illusion as an effect of fiction. Style-FayetteVille, 38(3), 325. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Kunzová, Nikola, Adam Štěpánek, Daniel Echeverri, Danielle K. Langlois & Simone Kriglstein
Mustazza, Chris
Pérez, Héctor J
Thissen, Birte A. K., Wolff Schlotz, Cornelius Abel, Mathias Scharinger, Klaus Frieler, Julia Merrill, Thomas Haider & Winfried Menninghaus
Dahy, Faten Abdelaziz & Khaled Mostafa Karam
Hartung, Franziska, Yuchao Wang, Marloes Mak, Roel Willems & Anjan Chatterjee
Hermida, Alberto, Mónica Barrientos Bueno & Héctor J. Pérez
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Polvinen, Merja, Howard Sklar & Anezka Kuzmicova
Kuiken, Don & Shawn Douglas
2018. Living metaphor as the site of bidirectional literary engagement. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
