In:Linguistics and Literary History: In honour of Sylvia Adamson
Edited by Anita Auer, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson and Violeta Sotirova
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 25] 2016
► pp. 31–48
Chapter 2. The origin and development of the iffy-an(d) conjunction
Published online: 20 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.25.03aue
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.25.03aue
The an(d) conjunction, whose primary function in present-day English is
coordination, could introduce conditional clauses in earlier stages of English,
most notably during the Middle English and the Early Modern English periods
(Rissanen 1999: 281). This particular use of the conjunction, which Adamson
has termed iffy-an(d) (2001: 212), is strongly associated with literary English, as
in this example from Shakespeare:
An I may hide my face, let me play Thisby too, I’ll
speak in a monstrous little voice. ‘Thisne,
Thisne;’ ‘Ah, Pyramus, lover dear! thy Thisby dear,
and lady dear!’ (Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night’s Dream I, ii, Bottom)
In Early Modern English, iffy-an(d) is commonly found in drama with uneducated
or lower-class speakers as well as in representations of dialect speech (cf.
Adamson 2001: 213; Culpepter and Kytö 2010: 167). While findings on the use of
iffy-an(d) in Early Modern English already exist, empirical studies on the use
of the conjunction in Middle English literary texts are still lacking. This paper
thus seeks to investigate the distribution and the development of iffy-an(d) as
well as its competition with the conditional conjunction if in Middle English
literary texts. The study will be based on the TEAMS Middle English Texts Series
Online, a collection of prose and verse texts (e.g. religious texts, romances,
Chaucer’s works). The analysis will take into consideration both internal factors,
e.g. clause position, topic, verb choice, as well as external (social) factors. The
emphasis on the latter factors will reveal whether iffy-an(d) was already associated
with spoken language and a particular social group in the Middle English
period. Attention will also be paid to the emergence and the decline of the linguistic variant under investigation.
References (31)
Adamson, S. 2001. Understanding Shakespeare’s grammar: Studies in small words. In Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language – A Guide, S. Adamson, L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson & K. Wales (eds), 210–236. London: Arden.
Auer, A. 2006. Precept and practice: The influence of prescriptivism on the English subjunctive. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, C. Dalton-Puffer, D. Kastovsky, N. Ritt & H. Schendl (eds), 33–53. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
. 2009. The Subjunctive in the Age of Prescriptivism. English and German Developments during the Eighteenth Century. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Behaghel, O. 1928. Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band III: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
De Haan, G.J. 2001. Syntax of Old Frisian. In Handbuch des Friesischen, H. Haider Munske, N. Arhammar, V.F. Faltings, J.F. Hoekstra, O. de Vries, A.G.H. Walker & O. Wilts (eds), 626–636. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
The Dictionary of Old English. <[URL]>
Dunkel, G.E. 2014. Lexikon der Indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. 2 Bde. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
Epstein, R. 2008. “Fer in the north; I kan nat telle where”: Dialect, regionalism, and philologism. Studies in the Age of Chaucer 30: 95–124.
Fischer, O. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476, N. Blake (ed.), 207–409. Cambridge: CUP.
Fodor, A. 2006. A corpus study of and as a subordinating conjunction from Middle English to Early Modern English. The Even Yearbook 7. <[URL]> (24 November 2014).
A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325. Compiled by M. Laing. <[URL]>
The Middle English Dictionary: <[URL]>
Miège, G. 1688. The English Grammar, or the Grounds and Genius of the English Tongue. London: J. Redmanyne.
Mitchell, B. 1985. Old English Syntax, Vol. II: Subordination, Independent Elements, and Element Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED). <[URL]>
Paardekooper, P. 1993. En(de)/in/an ´indien´ enz.: Een uniek uitstervingsproces 1 en 2. Taal en Tongval. Tijdschrift voor Dialectologie 45: 50–83, 115–134.
Rissanen, M. 1999. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English. Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: CUP.
Spearing, A.S. 2005. Textual Subjectivity: The Encoding of Subjectivity in Medieval Narratives and Lyrics. Oxford: OUP.
TEAMS Middle English Texts. <[URL]>
Tolkien, J.R.R. 1934. Chaucer as a philologist: The Reeve’s Tale. Transactions of the Philological Society (1934): 1–70.
Visser, F.T. 1966. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part Two: Syntactical Units with One Verb (Continued). Leiden: Brill.
