Cover not available

In:Linguistics and Literary History: In honour of Sylvia Adamson
Edited by Anita Auer, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson and Violeta Sotirova
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 25] 2016
► pp. 112

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (41)
References
Adamson, S. 1989. With double tongue: Diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature, M. Short (ed.), 204–240. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994a. From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: Stylisation and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language change. Transactions of the Philological Society 92(1): 55–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adamsom, S. 1994b. Subjectivity in narration – Empathy and echo. In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, M. Yaguello (ed.), 193–208. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adamson, S. 1998a. The code as context: Language change and (mis) interpretation. In Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding, K. Malmkjaer & J. Williams (eds), 137–168. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998b. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, S. Romaine (ed.), 589–692. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000a. A lovely little example: word options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalisation in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach & D. Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 539–653. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The rise and fall of empathetic narrative: a historical perspective on perspective. In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, W. van Peer & S. Chatman (eds), 83–99. New York NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Prescribed reading: pronouns and gender in the eighteenth century. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 7, November 2007. <[URL]> (5 December 2014).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Working out the interest: Williams, Empson and Jane Austen. Critical Quarterly 50(1–2): 103–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Questions of identity in Renaissance drama: New historicism meets old philology. Shakespeare Quarterly 61(1): 56–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adolph, R. 1981. On the possibility of a history of prose style. Style 15: 435–449.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3): 487–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bray, J. 2014. A portrait of historical stylistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 485–500. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breban, T. 2010. English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brone, G. & Vandaele, J. (eds). 2009. Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busse, B. 2010. Recent trends in new historical stylistics. In Language and Style, D. McIntyre & B. Busse (eds), 32–54. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1982. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? And Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Èjxenbaum, B. 2002[1927]. The theory of the formal method. In Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, L. Matejka & K. Pomorska (eds), 3–37. Chicago IL: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmott, C., Sanford, A.J. & Dawydiak, E. 2007. Stylistics meets cognitive science: Studying style in fiction and readers’ attention from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style 41(2): 204–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer-Starcke, B. 2010. Corpus Linguistics in Literary Analysis: Jane Austen and her Contemporaries, London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. & Steen, G. 2003. Cognitive Poetics in Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guesquière, L. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by adjectives of completeness. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalisation, K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (eds), 277–315. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guesquière, L., Davidse, K. & Van linden, A. 2013. Subjective compounds and subjectivity/subjectification in the English noun phrase. English Studies 94(1): 90–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, C. Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. & Yuan, W. (eds). 2014. Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Louw, B. & Milojkovic, M. Forthcoming. Corpus Stylistics as Contextual Prosodic Theory and Subtext [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mahlberg, M. 2012. Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, P.H. 2009. On the micro-syntax of attributive adjectives. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(3): 358–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Culpeper, J. 2002. Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis [Linguistic Approaches to Literarure 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M.H. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. 2004. Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1962[1948]. Linguistics and Literary History. New York NY: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Studer, P. 2008. Historical Corpus Stylistics: Media, Technology and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandewinkel, S. & Davidse, K. 2008. The interlocking paths of development to emphasizer adjective pure . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9(2): 255–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viana, V., Zyngier, S. & Barnbrook, G. (eds). 2011. Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue