In:Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 227–252
Chapter 12. Empirical stylistics as a learning and research tool in the study of narrative viewpoint
Published online: 22 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.12sot
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.12sot
This chapter reports a study on students’ responses to a passage by Virginia Woolf which displays frequent shifts in viewpoint and a variety of speech and thought presentation modes. The students were asked to attribute the viewpoint in the passage and to demarcate the boundaries of individual viewpoints. The aims of the study are: to (1) assess the agreement among readers on how to assign viewpoint; (2) test the differences in interpretation between more experienced and less experienced readers; (3) expose students to the empirical investigation of literature in an experimental setting; and (4) reflect on the usefulness of incorporating empirical studies in the learning process. The findings demonstrate the level of readerly agreement on the attribution of viewpoint and the boundaries of individual viewpoints in an experimental text. The use of empirical methods as a learning tool in the stylistics classroom is assessed.
References (27)
Adamson, S.M. (1999). Literary language. In S. Romaine (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Volume 4: 1776-1997 (pp. 591-690). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andringa, E. (1996). Effects of ‘narrative distance’ on readers’ emotional involvement and response. Poetics, 23, 431-452.
Banfield, A. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bellard-Thomson, C. (2010). How students learn stylistics: Constructing an empirical study. Language and Literature, 19(1), 35-57.
Bray, J. (2007). The ‘dual voice’ of free indirect discourse: A reading experiment. Language and Literature, 16(1), 37-52.
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L.C., & Leung, A. (1993). Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundation. Poetics, 22, 5-35.
Dorfman, M. (1996). Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers. Poetics, 23, 453-470.
Herman, D. (1993). Towards a pragmatics of represented discourse: Narrative, speech and context in Woolf’s Between the Acts
. Poetics, 21, 377-409.
Miall, D. (1996). Empowering the reader: Literary response and classroom learning. In R. Kreuz & M. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 463-478). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Sanders, J., & Redeker, G. (1993). Linguistic perspective in short news stories. Poetics, 22, 69-87.
. (2007). Woolf's Experiments with Consciousness in Fiction. In M. Lambrou & P. Stockwell (Eds.), Contemporary Stylistics (pp. 7-18). Continuum.
. (2009). Narrative progression in the short story: A corpus-stylistic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vandelanotte, L. (2009). Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.
van Peer, W., & Pander Maat, H. (1996). Perspectivation and sympathy: Effects of narrative point of view. In R. Kreuz & M. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 143-154). Norwood, NJ Ablex.
. (2001). Narrative perspective and the interpretation of characters’ motives. Language and Literature, 10(3), 229-242.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Grisot, Giulia, Kathy Conklin & Violeta Sotirova
Jaashan, Hasan Mohammed
Wirag, Andreas
Cushing, Ian
van Krieken, Kobie
Cui, Yaxiao
Lugea, Jane
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
