Cover not available

In:Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 19–38

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2. Learning from literature

Empirical research on readers in schools and at the workplace

 | Utrecht University
 | Utrecht University
 | University of Bath
Published online: 22 July 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.02hak
This chapter explores what learning from literature entails and how we can come to insights about what literature can mean in the lives of readers, what they may discover about themselves and others. Reading literary stories leads to higher scores on standardized tests for social skills (e.g., ‘reading’ other peoples’ minds) than reading non-literary stories (Kidd & Castano, 2013). The available research, however, does not inform us about what causes these effects, relevant knowledge for a variety of social contexts, including literary education and social competence trainings (e.g., for managers). We explore the methodological possibilities and limitations to test our assumptions about relevant factors, conducting interdisciplinary research by combining insights of the Humanities in textual processes with the methodological rigor of the Social Sciences.
References (47)
References
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I.C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M. (2014). Fact vs fiction. How paratextual information shapes our reading process. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 22-29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvarez, J.L., & Merchan, C. (1992). The role narrative fiction in the development of imagination for action. International Studies of Management & Organization, 22, 27-45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bal, P.M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloSone, 8(1), e55341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bal, P.M., Butterman, O.S., & Bakker, A.B. (2011). The influence of fictional narrative experience on work outcomes: A conceptual analysis and research model. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 361-370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test” revised version: A study with normal adults, adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bird, J.J. (1984). Effects of fifth graders' attitudes and critical thinking/reading skills resulting from a Junior Great Book Program. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Rutgers University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology. Foundations for the empirical study of literary response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brokerhof, I. (In preparation). Uses of narrative fiction in the workplace: Changes in self and social perceptions. PhD project, Free University of Amsterdam.
Fialho, O. (2012). Self-modifying experiences in literary reading: A model for reader response. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Alberta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fialho, O., Miall, D.S., & Zyngier, S. (2012). Experiencing or interpreting literature: Wording instructions. In M. Burke, S. Csábi, L. Week, & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Pedagogical stylistics: Current trends in language, literature and ELT (pp. 58-74). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fialho, O., Zyngier, S., & Miall, D.S. (2011). Interpretation and experience: Two pedagogical interventions observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236-253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerrig, R.J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M., Garst, J. & Brock, T. (2004). The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In L.J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of media entertainment. Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 161-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gribble, J. (1983). Literary education: A revaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W. (2015). Empirical stylistics. In A companion to stylistics, V. Sotirova (Ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halász, L. (1991). Emotional effect and reminding in literary processing. Poetics 20: 247-272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61‐83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, D.R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences 52(2): 150-155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, D.C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377-380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koek, M. (In preparation). Literature as school for thinking; A study of a new, critical-learning based approach to literary education in high school. PhD dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
Koopman, E.M. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62-79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (In press). Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
. (In preparation). Reading suffering. An empirical inquiry into affective and reflective responses to narratives about mental pain. PhD dissertation. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Koopman, E.M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9, 79-111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, D. (2009). A theory of expressive reading. In S. Zyngier et al. (eds.), Directions in empirical literary studies (pp. 49-68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D.S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171-203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M.M. (2014). Absorbing stories: The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leverage, P., Mancing, H., Schweickert, R., & Marston William, J. (Eds.) (2011). Theory of Mind and literature. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J.B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications: EJCR 34(4), 407-428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D.S. (2006). Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389-407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), 37-58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101-117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, A.M., & Feeley, T.H. (2007). Comparing the persuasive effects of narrative versus statistical messages: A meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 93rd Annual Convention, TBA , Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. Accessed 15 December 2013 from: <[URL]>
Rhodes, C., & Brown, A.D. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 167-188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richell, R.A., Mitchell, D.G.V., Newman, C., Leonard, A., Baron-Cohen, S., & Blair, R.J.R. (2003). Theory of Mind and psychopathy: Can psychopathic individuals read the “language of the eyes”? Neuropsychologia, 41, 523-526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. (1938). Literature as Exploration. New York: MLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahtoe, A. (2011). Invloed van fictiebeleving op empathie & OCB op de werkvloer [Impact of fiction experience on empathy and OCB in the workplace]. Unpublished MA thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahtoe, A., & Bal, P.M. (2014). Does fiction make employees more helpful? Working paper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D.S. (2011). Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s “Rime of the Ancient Mariner.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 258-268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W. (Ed.) (2011). The future of scientific study of literature. Special issue of Scientific Study of Literature 1(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F., & Zyngier, S. (2012). Scientific methods for the humanities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Zyngier, S., & Hakemulder, J. (2007). Foregrounding: Past, present, future. In D. Hoover & S. Lattig (Eds.), Stylistics: Prospect and retrospect (pp. 1-23). Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waxler, R.P. (2008). Changing lives through literature. PMLA, 123(3), 678-682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winner, E., Goldstein, T., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art's sake? The impact of arts education. Paris: OECD Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Willems, Roel M.
2023. MA-EM: A neurocognitive model for understanding mixed and ambiguous emotions and morality. Cognitive Neuroscience 14:2 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Hakemulder, Frank
2022. Empirical Pedagogical Stylistics: Reader Response Research in the Classroom. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century, ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Wirag, Andreas
2020. The scope of empirical narratology. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 6:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Bladon, Henry
2019. Fiction, empathy and mental health nursing. British Journal of Mental Health Nursing 8:4 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Bracher, Mark, Deborah Barnbaum, Michael Byron, Tammy Clewell, Nancy Docherty, Françoise Massardier-Kenney, David Pereplyotchik, Susan Roxburgh & Elizabeth Smith-Pryor
2019. Compassion-Cultivating Pedagogy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Fialho, Olivia & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1692532 ff. DOI logo
Schrijvers, Marloes, Tanja Janssen, Olivia Fialho & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2019. Gaining Insight Into Human Nature: A Review of Literature Classroom Intervention Studies. Review of Educational Research 89:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Anne Mangen, Hildegunn Støle & Anne Charlotte Begnum
2017. Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Whiteley, Sara & Patricia Canning
2017. Reader response research in stylistics. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Bálint, Katalin, Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Miruna M. Doicaru & Ed S. Tan
2016. Reconceptualizing foregrounding. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Transformative Reading [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 42], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue