Cover not available

Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory” by Diane Lillo-Martin, Ronice Müller de Quadros and Deborah Chen Pichler
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6] 2016
► pp. 828–833

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Commentary

Mouthing and demonstrating in bimodal contexts

 | University of Göttingen
Published online: 17 January 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.6.6.16ste
Article outline
  • 1.Mouthing
  • 2.Classifiers, role shift, and demonstration
  • References
References (13)
References
Capek, C.M., Waters, D., Woll, B., MacSweeney, M., Brammer, M.J., McGuire, P.K., David, A.S., & Campbell, R. (2008). Hand and mouth: Cortical correlates of lexical processing in British Sign Language and speechreading English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1220–1234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1979). Quotation. Theory and Decision, 111, 27–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, K. (2015). Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38, 477–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H.B, Thompson, R., & Gollan, T.H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 43–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, A., & Pendzich, N.-K. (to appear). Between narrator and protagonist in fables of German Sign Language. To appear in A. Hübl, & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Linguistic dimensions of narration. Studies on text structures in spoken and sign languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hosemann, J. (2015). The processing of German Sign Language sentences. Three event-related potential studies on phonological, morpho-syntactic, and semantic aspects. PhD dissertation, University of Göttingen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (2012). Utterance reports and constructed action. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (pp. 365–387). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marshall, J., Atkinson, J., Woll, B., & Thacker, A. (2005). Aphasia in bilingual users of British Sign Language and English: Effects of cross-linguistic cues. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 719–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morford, J.P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Pinar, P., & Kroll, J.F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations. Cognition, 118, 286–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormel, E., Hermans, D., Knoors, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Cross-language effects in written word recognition: The case of bilingual deaf children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 288–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, P. (to appear). Super monsters I: Attitude and action role shift in sign language. To appear in Semantics & Pragmatics.
Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2012). Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension. Cognition, 124, 314–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I. (2012). Classifiers. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach, & B. Woll (Eds.), Sign language. Handbooks of linguistics and communication science (pp. 158–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bauer, Anastasia & Masha Kyuseva
2022. New Insights Into Mouthings: Evidence From a Corpus-Based Study of Russian Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue