Cover not available

Commentary published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The development of bimodal bilingualism: Implications for linguistic theory” by Diane Lillo-Martin, Ronice Müller de Quadros and Deborah Chen Pichler
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6] 2016
► pp. 817–821

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Commentary

One or two derivations in (bimodal) bilinguals

That’s the question

 | ICREA | Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Published online: 17 January 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.6.6.14que
References (4)
References
Donati, C., & Branchini, C. (2013). Challenging linearization: Simultaneous mixing in the production of bimodal bilinguals. In T. Biberauer, & I. Roberts (Eds.), Challenges to Linearization (pp. 93–128). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Müller de Quadros, R., & Chen Pichler, D. (2016). The Development of Bimodal Bilingualism: Implications for Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B., & Lee, R.G. (2000). The Syntax of American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, R., & Quer, J. (2002). V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 27, 73–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue