Reply published In: Epistemological issue with keynote article “The role of language processing in language acquisition” by Colin Phillips and Lara Ehrenhofer
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4] 2015
► pp. 545–555
Reply
Learning obscure and obvious properties of language
Published online: 31 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.4.19phi
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.4.19phi
References (38)
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 319–346). New York: Academic Press.
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 631, 544–573.
de Villiers, J.G., & Roeper, T. (1995) Relative clauses are barriers to Wh-movement for young children. Journal of Child Language, 221, 389–404.
Dillon, B., Chow, W.-Y., Wagers, M., Guo, T., Liu, F., & Phillips, C. (2014). The structure-sensitivity of memory access: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1025.
Dillon, B., Nevins, A., Austin, A.C., & Phillips, C. (2012). Syntactic and semantic predictors of tense in Hindi: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 271, 313–344.
Elman, J.L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 481, 71–99.
Fodor, J.D. & Sakas, W. (2005). The subset principle in syntax: Costs of compliance. Journal of Linguistics, 411, 513–569.
Goro, T. (2007). Language-specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Grüter, T., Lew-Wiliams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem. Second Language Research, 281, 191–215.
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 731, 418–433.
Hopp, H. (2011). Internal and external factors in the child L2 development of the German determiner phrase. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 238–264.
. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 291, 33–56.
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L.V. (2010). Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 611, 343–365.
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 63–100.
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 573–633.
Monner, D., Vatz, K., Morini, G., Hwang, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2013). A neural network model of the effects of entrenchment and memory development on grammatical gender learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 246–265.
Omaki, A., & Lidz, J. (2015). Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition, 221, 158–192.
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2014). No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 101, 206–233.
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B.D., & Clahsen, H. (2004). On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Linguistics, 421, 669–705.
Phillips, C. (2010). Syntax at age two: Cross-linguistic differences. Language Acquisition, 171, 70–120. [Originally published 1995 in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 26.]
. (2013). Some arguments and non-arguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes, 281, 156–187.
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Phillips, C., Wagers, M.W., & Lau, E.F. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the Interfaces (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 371), (pp. 147–180). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications.
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 351, 185–205.
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In M. García Mayo, M. Junkal Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrían (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Snedeker, J. (2013). Children’s sentence processing. In R. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 189–220). New York: Psychology Press.
Snyder, W. (2011). Children’s grammatical conservatism: Implications for syntactic theory. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference in Language Development (Vol. 11, pp. 1–20). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 1–33.
Thornton, R. (1990). Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Trueswell, J.C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N.M., & Logrip, M.L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 731, 89–134.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.