References (14)
References
Allopenna, P.D., Magnuson, J.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 381, 419–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, G.T.M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don’t: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J.M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action. Eye Movements and the Visual World (pp. 347–386). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt-Kobele, O.-C., & Höhle, B. (2014). The detection of subject-verb agreement violations by German-speaking children: An eye-tracking study. Lingua, 1441, 7–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dussias, P.E., Valdés Kroff, J.R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R.E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 351, 353–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M.W. (2007). The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 571, 519–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G.R. (2013a). Predicting meaning: What the brain tells us about the architecture of language comprehension. Invited talk presented at the 26th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. March 21-23, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). The proactive comprehender: What event-related potentials tell us about the dynamics of reading comprehension. In B. Miller, L.E. Cutting, & P.M. McCardle, (Eds.), Unraveling reading Comprehension. Behavioral, Neurological, and Genetic Components (pp. 176–192). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). Young children learning Spanish make rapid use of grammatical gender in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 18(3), 193–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 631, 447–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sekerina, I.A. (2012). Time course of processing of grammatical agreement information by Russian children. Paper presented at the 37th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sekerina, I.A., & Campanelli, L. (2013). Real-time processing of gender and number agreement by heritage Russian speakers. Poster presented at the International Conference on Multilingualism: Linguistic Challenges and Neurocognitive Mechanisms.McGill University, Montréal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., & Sedivy, J.C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 2681, 1632–1634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Fuchs, Zuzanna, Emma Kealey, Esra Eldem-Tunç, Leo Mermelstein, Linh Pham, Anna Runova, Yue Chen, Metehan Oğuz, Seoyoon Hong, Catherine Pan & JK Subramony
2025. Measuring Adult Heritage Language Lexical Proficiency for Studies on Facilitative Processing of Gender. Languages 10:8  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Ivanova-Sullivan, Tanya, Natalia Meir & Irina A. Sekerina
2024. Fine-grained differences in gender-cue strength affect predictive processing in children: Cross-linguistic evidence from Russian and Bulgarian. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 242  pp. 105868 ff. DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2024. Morphosyntactic predictive processing in adult heritage speakers: effects of cue availability and spoken and written language experience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:1  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2025. Child heritage speakers’ reading skills in the majority language and exposure to the heritage language support morphosyntactic prediction in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Parshina, Olga, Nina Ladinskaya, Lidia Gault & Irina A. Sekerina
2024. Predictive Language Processing in Russian Heritage Speakers: Task Effects on Morphosyntactic Prediction in Reading. Languages 9:5  pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Prystauka, Yanina, Jiuzhou Hao, Reinaldo Cabrera Perez & Jason Rothman
2024. Lexical interference and prediction in sentence processing among Russian heritage speakers: an individual differences approach. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 8:3  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Bovolenta, Giulia & Emma Marsden
2022. PREDICTION AND ERROR-BASED LEARNING IN L2 PROCESSING AND ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:5  pp. 1384 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Zuzanna
2022. Eyetracking evidence for heritage speakers’ access to abstract syntactic agreement features in real-time processing. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Fuchs, Zuzanna
2024. Processing of grammatical gender agreement morphemes in Polish: evidence from the Visual World Paradigm. Morphology 34:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Zuzanna
2025. Independent processing of lexical features on portmanteau morphemes: evidence from Polish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 40:6  pp. 834 ff. DOI logo
Parshina, Olga, Anastasiya Lopukhina & Irina A. Sekerina
2022. Can Heritage Speakers Predict Lexical and Morphosyntactic Information in Reading?. Languages 7:1  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue